Claims of not-knowing as patients’ responses in psychodynamic psychotherapy

Carolina Fenner
Leibniz Institute for the German Language
Abstract

A fundamental aspect of psychotherapeutic conversation is the joint work of therapist and patient on articulating something previously hidden or repressed. If the patient refuses to comply with the therapist’s questions or suggestions, such cooperative work is limited. A possible non-cooperative response by the patient is the claim of not-knowing. This study examines conversation analytically, using video recordings of German-speaking outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapies, how patients express two different claims of not-knowing (German ich weiß nicht (‘I don’t know’) and keine Ahnung (‘no idea’)) as a response to a question. The analysis results in four different functions: refusing to answer, indexing difficulties, projecting continuation, and disconfirming, which can only be determined by means of the context and not the structure of ich weiß nicht or keine Ahnung. Some of the outlined functions might be context-specific for (psychodynamic) psychotherapy.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

Psychodynamic psychotherapy emerges from psychoanalytic psychotherapy (see Abrahams and Rohleder 2021). As an institutional interaction, it is characterized by epistemic asymmetry: “the talk mainly addresses the client’s experience, which, as such, is unavailable to the therapist” (Weiste, Voutilainen and Peräkylä 2016, 646). Therapists have no direct access to the patients’ (inner) experiences but must gain sufficient insight to be able to work therapeutically. Not only do they have to respond to the patients’ narratives but they also have to transform them in different ways. This transformation helps the patients to become aware of new possibilities and to see their previously problematic experiences in a new light. Accordingly, therapists are dependent on the patients reporting their (everyday and inner) experiences. Patients, in turn, are (at least partially) unaware of emotional, motivational, and mental processes. They rely on the expertise of the therapists to point out underlying unconscious dynamics (cf. Spranz-Fogasy, Kabatnik and Nikendei 2018, 112; Weiste, Voutilainen and Peräkylä 2016, 646). “Thus, managing epistemic asymmetry […] is crucial to the process of facilitating change in psychotherapeutic interaction” (Weiste, Voutilainen and Peräkylä 2016, 646).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abrahams, Deborah, and Poul Rohleder
2021A Clinical Guide to Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
2009 “ ‘So er I Just Sort I Dunno It’s Just Because…’: A Corpus Study of I Don’t Know and Dunno in Learners’ Spoken English.” Language and Computers 68 (1): 151–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beach, Wayne A., and Terri R. Metzger
1997 “Claiming Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 562–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, Pia
2017 “Gebrauchsprofile von weiß nich und keine Ahnung im Gespräch: Ein Blick auf nicht-responsive Vorkommen [Usage profiles of don’t know and no idea in conversation: A look at non-responsive occurrences].” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 157–182. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
2022 “Sprachliche Variation im Gegenwartsdeutschen: Lautliche Realisierungsvarianten im Gespräch [Linguistic variation in contemporary German: Phonetic realization variants in conversation].” In Forschen in der Linguistik: Eine Methodeneinführung für das Germanistik-Studium, ed. by Michael Beißwenger, Lothar Lemnitzer, and Carolin Müller-Spitzer, 82–102. Paderborn: Brill/Fink. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf
2009a “Verstehensdefizit als Antwortverpflichtung: Interaktionale Eigenschaften der Modalpartikel denn in Fragen [Comprehension deficit as an obligation to answer: Interactional properties of the modal particle denn in questions].” In Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung, ed. by Susanne Günthner, and Jörg Bücker, 21–56. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b “Therapeutisches Fragen als Hebammenkunst [Therapeutic questioning as the art of midwifery].” Psychoanalyse, Texte zur Sozialforschung 13 (2): 154–62. https://​ids​-pub​.bsz​-bw​.de​/frontdoor​/index​/index​/docId​/2984
Eichinger, Ludwig M.
2018 “Keine Ahnung: Über etcetera-Formeln und Verwandtes [No idea: About etcetera formulas and related topics].” In Diskursive Verfestigungen: Schnittstellen zwischen Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich, ed. by Laurent Gautier, Pierre-Yves Modicom, and Hélène Vinckel-Roisin, 243–262. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen C. Levinson
2010 “Question-Response Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2615–2619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenson, Ralph R.
2019The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis: Volume 1. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guxholli, Aurora, Liisa Voutilainen, and Anssi Peräkylä
2022 “What About You? Responding to a Face-Threatening Question in Psychotherapy.” In Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing Interaction in Psychotherapy, Medical Encounters, Coaching and in Social Media, ed. by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 79–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heller, Vivien
2021 “Embodied Displays of ‘Doing Thinking’: Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children’s Argumentative Activities.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 636671. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmer, Henrike, and Arnulf Deppermann
2017 “ Ich weiß nicht zwischen Assertion und Diskursmarker: Verwendungsspektren eines Ausdrucks und Überlegungen zu Kriterien für Diskursmarker [ I don’t know between assertion and discourse marker: Ranges of use of an expression and considerations on criteria for discourse markers].” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 131–156. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.Google Scholar
Helmer, Henrike, Arnulf Deppermann, and Silke Reineke
2017 “Antwort, epistemischer Marker oder Widerspruch? Sequenzielle, semantische und pragmatische Eigenschaften von ich weiß nicht [Answer, epistemic marker or contradiction? Sequential, semantic and pragmatic properties of I don’t know ].” In Verben im interaktiven Kontext: Bewegungsverben und mentale Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske, and Arne Zeschel, 377–405. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar
Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke, and Arnulf Deppermann
2016 “A Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: Ich weiß nicht as a Resource for Dispreferred Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2012a “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian
2002 “Resisting the Incitement to Talk in Child Counselling: Aspects of the Utterance ‘I Don’t Know’.” Discourse Studies 4 (2): 147–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jager, Margot, Mike Huiskes, Janneke Metselaar, Erik J. Knorth, Andrea F. de Winter, and Sijmen A. Reijneveld
2016 “Therapists’ Continuation Following I Don’t Know-Responses of Adolescents in Psychotherapy.” Patient Education and Counseling 99: 1778–1784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1985 “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk About Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2011 “The Terms of Not Knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keiten, Sophie
2018 “Formen und Funktionen von ‘keine Ahnung’ im Gespräch [Forms and functions of ‘no idea’ in conversation].” Studentische Arbeitspapierreihe Sprache und Interaktion (SpIn) 31. Online: https://​arbeitspapiere​.sprache​-interaktion​.de​/stud​/2018​/05/
Kendon, Adam
1967 “Some Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta Psychologica 26: 22–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Katharina
2014Spracheinstellungen und Identitätskonstruktion: Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung sprachbiographischer Interviews mit Deutsch-Vietnamesen [Language attitudes and identity construction: A conversation-analytical study of language biographical interviews with German-Vietnamese people]. München: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Katharina, and Benjamin Stoltenburg
2013 “ ‘Oder so’, ‘und so’, ‘und so was’, ‘und so weiter’ etc.: Eine interaktionale Perspektive auf Etcetera-Formeln [‘Or so’, ‘and so’, ‘and so forth’, ‘and so on’ etc.: An interactional perspective on etcetera formulas].” GIDI-Arbeitspapierreihe 48: 1–35.Google Scholar
Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler, and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2016 “A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 72–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mack, Christina, Christoph Nikendei, Johannes C. Ehrenthal, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
2016 “ ‘[…] hab ich glaub ich die richtigen Fragen gestellt’: Therapeutische Fragehandlungen in psychodiagnostischen Gesprächen [‘(…) I think I asked the right questions’: Therapeutic questioning in psychodiagnostic conversations].” In OPAL. Online publizierte Arbeiten zur Linguistik 3, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Mechthild Elstermann, and Doris Stolberg. Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacMartin, Clare
2008 “Resisting Optimistic Questions in Narrative and Solution-Focused Therapies.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 80–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miecznikowski, Johanna, and Jérôme Jacquin
2023 “Editorial: Epistemic and Evidential Markers in Contexts of Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 213: 4–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Möhrs, Christine
2020 “ ‘Hast du eine Ahnung,…?’ Eine lexikografische und korpusbasierte Untersuchung am Beispiel des Lexems Ahnung [‘Do you have any idea…?’ A lexicographical and corpus-based study using the example of the lexeme Ahnung ].” In Schnittstellen der Germanistik: Festschrift für Hans Bickes, ed. by Janina Behr, François Conrad, Stephan Kornmesser, and Kristin Tschernig, 185–214. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2018 “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction. Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter
2013 “Resistance in Couples Counselling: Sequences of Talk that Disrupt Progressivity and Promote Disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 49: 18–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, and Loreley Hadic Zabala
2008 “Expandable Responses: How Clients Get Prompted to Say More During Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (2): 187–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2022 “Multimodal Action Formats for Managing Preference: Chais pas ‘Dunno’ Plus Gaze Conduct in Dispreferred Responses to Questions.” Journal of Pragmatics 197: 81–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike, and Ashley Hesson
2016 “Discourse-Pragmatic Variation across Situations, Varieties, Ages: I Don’t Know in Sociolinguistic and Medical Interviews.” Language and Communication 49: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reineke, Silke
2018 “Interaktionale Analysen kognitiver Phänomene: Wissenszuschreibungen mit der Modalpartikel ja [Interactional analyses of cognitive phenomena: Knowledge attributions with the modal particle ja ].” In Sprachliches Handeln und Kognition: Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Analysen, ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Simon Meier, 83–204. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schauenburg, Henning, Ulrike Dinger, Achim Kriebel, Julia Huber, Hans-Christoph Friedrich, Wolfgang Herzog, and Christoph Nikendei
2019 “Zur Entwicklung tiefenpsychologischer Ausbildungsinstitute: Das Beispiel des Heidelberger Instituts für Psychotherapie [The development of depth psychological training institutes: The example of the Heidelberg Institute for Psychotherapy].” Psychotherapeut 64: 46–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, et al.
2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2) [Conversation analytic transcription system 2 (GAT 2)].” Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402. https://​pub​.uni​-bielefeld​.de​/record​/2472604
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas
2020 “Fragen und ihre Funktionen in psychotherapeutischen Gesprächen [Questions and their functions in psychotherapeutic conversations].” In Institutionelle und organisationale Kommunikation: Theorie, Methodologie, Empirie und Kritik, ed. by Helmut Gruber, Jürgen Spitzmüller, and Rudolf de Cillia, 39–70. Göttingen: V&R Unipress. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas, Eva-Maria Graf, Johannes C. Ehrenthal, and Christoph Nikendei
2020 “Requesting Examples in Psychodiagnostic Interviews.” Communication and Medicine 16 (2): 129–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas, Susanne Kabatnik, and Christoph Nikendei
2018 “Wissens­konstitution durch Lösungsorientierte Fragen in psychodiagnostischen Gesprächen [Knowledge constitution through solution-oriented questions in psychodiagnostic interviews].” Rhetorik 37 (1): 111–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
2008 “Introduction: Questioning and Affiliation/​Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse Studies 10 (1): 5–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006 “A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35 (3): 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stremlau, Philipp
2017 “Communicative Practices of Resistance in Psychotherapy Interactions: Patients’ Resistance through Reactive Ich-weiß-nicht-Constructions.” Unpublished Master Thesis, University of Waterloo. Online: https://​uwspace​.uwaterloo​.ca​/bitstream​/handle​/10012​/12279​/Stremlau​_Philipp​.pdf​?sequence​=3
Stukenbrock, Anja, Arnulf Deppermann, and Carl E. Scheidt
2021 “The Art of Tentativity: Delivering Interpretations in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics 176: 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsui, Amy B. M.
1991 “The Pragmatic Functions of I Don’t Know .” Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 11 (4): 607–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2011 “ I Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (4): 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina, Liisa Voutilainen, and Anssi Peräkylä
2016 “Epistemic Asymmetries in Psychotherapy Interaction: Therapists’ Practices for Displaying Access to Clients’ Inner Experiences.” Sociology of Health and Illness 38 (4): 645–661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Worsøe, Line B., and Thomas W. Jensen
2020 “Questioning Questions in Psychotherapeutic Practice: The Dialogical Dynamics of Change in Therapy through Clients Questioning Therapists.” Scandinavian Studies in Language 11 (1): 279–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yao, Xueli, and Wen Ma
2017 “Question Resistance and Its Management in Chinese Psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 19 (2): 216–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar