Claims of not-knowing as patients’ responses in psychodynamic psychotherapy
CarolinaFenner
Leibniz Institute for the German Language
Abstract
A fundamental aspect of psychotherapeutic conversation is the joint work of therapist and patient on articulating
something previously hidden or repressed. If the patient refuses to comply with the therapist’s questions or suggestions, such
cooperative work is limited. A possible non-cooperative response by the patient is the claim of not-knowing. This study examines
conversation analytically, using video recordings of German-speaking outpatient psychodynamic psychotherapies, how patients
express two different claims of not-knowing (German ich weiß nicht (‘I don’t know’) and keine
Ahnung (‘no idea’)) as a response to a question. The analysis results in four different functions: refusing
to answer, indexing difficulties, projecting continuation, and
disconfirming, which can only be determined by means of the context and not the structure of ich weiß
nicht or keine Ahnung. Some of the outlined functions might be context-specific for (psychodynamic)
psychotherapy.
Psychodynamic psychotherapy emerges from psychoanalytic psychotherapy (see Abrahams and
Rohleder 2021). As an institutional interaction, it is characterized by epistemic asymmetry: “the talk mainly addresses the
client’s experience, which, as such, is unavailable to the therapist” (Weiste, Voutilainen and
Peräkylä 2016, 646). Therapists have no direct access to the patients’ (inner) experiences but must gain sufficient insight
to be able to work therapeutically. Not only do they have to respond to the patients’ narratives but they also have to transform them
in different ways. This transformation helps the patients to become aware of new possibilities and to see their previously problematic
experiences in a new light. Accordingly, therapists are dependent on the patients reporting their (everyday and inner) experiences.
Patients, in turn, are (at least partially) unaware of emotional, motivational, and mental processes. They rely on the expertise of
the therapists to point out underlying unconscious dynamics (cf. Spranz-Fogasy, Kabatnik and
Nikendei 2018, 112; Weiste, Voutilainen and Peräkylä 2016, 646). “Thus, managing
epistemic asymmetry […] is crucial to the process of facilitating change in psychotherapeutic interaction” (Weiste, Voutilainen and Peräkylä 2016, 646).
References
Abrahams, Deborah, and Poul Rohleder
2021A
Clinical Guide to Psychodynamic
Psychotherapy. London: Routledge.
Aijmer, Karin
2009 “ ‘So
er I Just Sort I Dunno It’s Just Because…’: A Corpus Study of I Don’t Know and Dunno in
Learners’ Spoken English.” Language and
Computers 68 (1): 151–168.
Beach, Wayne
A., and Terri
R. Metzger
1997 “Claiming
Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication
Research 23 (4): 562–588.
Bergmann, Pia
2017 “Gebrauchsprofile von weiß nich und keine Ahnung im Gespräch: Ein Blick auf
nicht-responsive Vorkommen [Usage profiles of don’t know
and no idea in conversation: A look at non-responsive
occurrences].” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und
Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 157–182. Göttingen: Verlag
für Gesprächsforschung.
Bergmann, Pia
2022 “Sprachliche Variation im Gegenwartsdeutschen: Lautliche Realisierungsvarianten im
Gespräch [Linguistic variation in contemporary German: Phonetic realization
variants in conversation].” In Forschen in der Linguistik: Eine
Methodeneinführung für das Germanistik-Studium, ed. by Michael Beißwenger, Lothar Lemnitzer, and Carolin Müller-Spitzer, 82–102. Paderborn: Brill/Fink.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2018Interactional
Linguistics: Studying Language in Social
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Deppermann, Arnulf
2009a “Verstehensdefizit als Antwortverpflichtung: Interaktionale Eigenschaften der Modalpartikel denn
in Fragen [Comprehension deficit as an obligation to answer: Interactional
properties of the modal particle denn in
questions].” In Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- und
Fremdpositionierung, ed. by Susanne Günthner, and Jörg Bücker, 21–56. Berlin: De
Gruyter.
2018 “Keine Ahnung:
Über etcetera-Formeln und Verwandtes [No idea: About etcetera formulas and
related topics].” In Diskursive Verfestigungen: Schnittstellen zwischen
Morphosyntax, Phraseologie und Pragmatik im Deutschen und im Sprachvergleich, ed.
by Laurent Gautier, Pierre-Yves Modicom, and Hélène Vinckel-Roisin, 243–262. Berlin,
Boston: De Gruyter.
Enfield, Nick
J., Tanya Stivers, and Stephen
C. Levinson
2010 “Question-Response
Sequences in Conversation across Ten Languages: An Introduction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 42: 2615–2619.
Greenson, Ralph
R.
2019The Technique and Practice of
Psychoanalysis: Volume
1. London: Routledge.
Guxholli, Aurora, Liisa Voutilainen, and Anssi Peräkylä
2022 “What
About You? Responding to a Face-Threatening Question in
Psychotherapy.” In Relationships in Organized Helping: Analyzing
Interaction in Psychotherapy, Medical Encounters, Coaching and in Social Media, ed.
by Claudio Scarvaglieri, Eva-Maria Graf, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 79–104. Amsterdam: John
Benjamins.
Heller, Vivien
2021 “Embodied
Displays of ‘Doing Thinking’: Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children’s Argumentative
Activities.” Frontiers in
Psychology 12: 636671.
Helmer, Henrike, and Arnulf Deppermann
2017 “Ich weiß nicht zwischen Assertion und Diskursmarker: Verwendungsspektren eines Ausdrucks und
Überlegungen zu Kriterien für Diskursmarker [
I don’t know
between assertion and discourse marker: Ranges of use of an expression and considerations on criteria for discourse
markers].” In Diskursmarker im Deutschen: Reflexionen und
Analysen, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Arnulf Deppermann, Henrike Helmer, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy, 131–156. Göttingen: Verlag
für Gesprächsforschung.
Helmer, Henrike, Arnulf Deppermann, and Silke Reineke
2017 “Antwort, epistemischer Marker oder Widerspruch? Sequenzielle, semantische und pragmatische Eigenschaften von
ich weiß nicht [Answer, epistemic marker or
contradiction? Sequential, semantic and pragmatic properties of I don’t
know
].” In Verben im interaktiven Kontext: Bewegungsverben und
mentale Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch, ed. by Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske, and Arne Zeschel, 377–405. Tübingen: Narr
Francke Attempto.
Helmer, Henrike, Silke Reineke, and Arnulf Deppermann
2016 “A
Range of Uses of Negative Epistemic Constructions in German: Ich weiß nicht as a Resource for Dispreferred
Actions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 106: 97–114.
Heritage, John
2012a “Epistemics
in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.
Heritage, John
2012b “The
Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.
Hutchby, Ian
2002 “Resisting
the Incitement to Talk in Child Counselling: Aspects of the Utterance ‘I Don’t
Know’.” Discourse
Studies 4 (2): 147–168.
Jager, Margot, Mike Huiskes, Janneke Metselaar, Erik
J. Knorth, Andrea F.
de Winter, and Sijmen
A. Reijneveld
2016 “Therapists’
Continuation Following I Don’t Know-Responses of Adolescents in
Psychotherapy.” Patient Education and
Counseling 99: 1778–1784.
Jefferson, Gail
1985 “On
the Organization of Laughter in Talk About Troubles.” In Structures
of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J.
Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Keevallik, Leelo
2011 “The
Terms of Not Knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in
Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
1967 “Some
Functions of Gaze-Direction in Social Interaction.” Acta
Psychologica 26: 22–63.
König, Katharina
2014Spracheinstellungen und Identitätskonstruktion: Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung sprachbiographischer
Interviews mit Deutsch-Vietnamesen [Language attitudes and identity construction:
A conversation-analytical study of language biographical interviews with German-Vietnamese
people]. München: De
Gruyter.
König, Katharina, and Benjamin Stoltenburg
2013 “ ‘Oder so’, ‘und so’, ‘und so was’, ‘und so weiter’ etc.: Eine interaktionale Perspektive auf
Etcetera-Formeln [‘Or so’, ‘and so’, ‘and so forth’, ‘and so on’ etc.: An
interactional perspective on etcetera
formulas].” GIDI-Arbeitspapierreihe 48: 1–35.
Lindström, Jan, Yael Maschler, and Simona
Pekarek Doehler
2016 “A
Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Grammar and Negative Epistemics in
Talk-in-Interaction.” Journal of
Pragmatics 106: 72–79.
Mack, Christina, Christoph Nikendei, Johannes
C. Ehrenthal, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy
2016 “ ‘[…] hab ich glaub ich die richtigen Fragen gestellt’: Therapeutische Fragehandlungen in psychodiagnostischen
Gesprächen [‘(…) I think I asked the right questions’: Therapeutic
questioning in psychodiagnostic conversations].” In OPAL. Online
publizierte Arbeiten zur Linguistik 3, ed. by Hardarik Blühdorn, Mechthild Elstermann, and Doris Stolberg. Mannheim: Institut
für Deutsche Sprache.
MacMartin, Clare
2008 “Resisting
Optimistic Questions in Narrative and Solution-Focused
Therapies.” In Conversation Analysis and
Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 80–99. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Miecznikowski, Johanna, and Jérôme Jacquin
2023 “Editorial:
Epistemic and Evidential Markers in Contexts of Disagreement.” Journal of
Pragmatics 213: 4–11.
Möhrs, Christine
2020 “ ‘Hast du eine Ahnung,…?’ Eine lexikografische und korpusbasierte Untersuchung am Beispiel des Lexems
Ahnung [‘Do you have any idea…?’ A lexicographical and
corpus-based study using the example of the lexeme
Ahnung
].” In Schnittstellen der Germanistik:
Festschrift für Hans Bickes, ed. by Janina Behr, François Conrad, Stephan Kornmesser, and Kristin Tschernig, 185–214. Berlin: Peter
Lang.
Mondada, Lorenza
2018 “Multiple
Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction. Challenges for Transcribing
Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 51 (1): 85–106.
Muntigl, Peter
2013 “Resistance
in Couples Counselling: Sequences of Talk that Disrupt Progressivity and Promote
Disaffiliation.” Journal of
Pragmatics 49: 18–37.
Muntigl, Peter, and Loreley
Hadic Zabala
2008 “Expandable
Responses: How Clients Get Prompted to Say More During Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 41 (2): 187–226.
Pekarek
Doehler, Simona
2022 “Multimodal
Action Formats for Managing Preference: Chais pas ‘Dunno’ Plus Gaze Conduct in Dispreferred Responses to
Questions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 197: 81–99.
Pichler, Heike, and Ashley Hesson
2016 “Discourse-Pragmatic
Variation across Situations, Varieties, Ages: I Don’t Know in Sociolinguistic and Medical
Interviews.” Language and
Communication 49: 1–18.
Reineke, Silke
2018 “Interaktionale Analysen kognitiver Phänomene: Wissenszuschreibungen mit der Modalpartikel
ja [Interactional analyses of cognitive phenomena:
Knowledge attributions with the modal particle
ja
].” In Sprachliches Handeln und Kognition:
Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Analysen, ed. by Konstanze Marx, and Simon Meier, 83–204. Berlin,
Boston: De Gruyter.
Schauenburg, Henning, Ulrike Dinger, Achim Kriebel, Julia Huber, Hans-Christoph Friedrich, Wolfgang Herzog, and Christoph Nikendei
2019 “Zur Entwicklung tiefenpsychologischer Ausbildungsinstitute: Das Beispiel des Heidelberger Instituts für
Psychotherapie [The development of depth psychological training institutes:
The example of the Heidelberg Institute for
Psychotherapy].” Psychotherapeut 64: 46–54.
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, et al.
2020 “Fragen und ihre Funktionen in psychotherapeutischen Gesprächen [Questions and their functions in psychotherapeutic
conversations].” In Institutionelle und organisationale Kommunikation:
Theorie, Methodologie, Empirie und Kritik, ed. by Helmut Gruber, Jürgen Spitzmüller, and Rudolf
de Cillia, 39–70. Göttingen: V&R
Unipress.
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas, Eva-Maria Graf, Johannes
C. Ehrenthal, and Christoph Nikendei
2020 “Requesting
Examples in Psychodiagnostic Interviews.” Communication and
Medicine 16 (2): 129–141.
Spranz-Fogasy, Thomas, Susanne Kabatnik, and Christoph Nikendei
2018 “Wissenskonstitution durch Lösungsorientierte Fragen in psychodiagnostischen
Gesprächen [Knowledge constitution through solution-oriented questions in
psychodiagnostic
interviews].” Rhetorik 37 (1): 111–133.
Steensig, Jakob, and Paul Drew
2008 “Introduction:
Questioning and Affiliation/Disaffiliation in Interaction.” Discourse
Studies 10 (1): 5–15.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey
D. Robinson
2006 “A
Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in
Society 35 (3): 367–392.
Stukenbrock, Anja, Arnulf Deppermann, and Carl
E. Scheidt
2021 “The
Art of Tentativity: Delivering Interpretations in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.” Journal of
Pragmatics 176: 76–96.
Tsui, Amy
B. M.
1991 “The Pragmatic Functions of
I Don’t Know.” Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of
Discourse 11 (4): 607–622.
Weatherall, Ann
2011 “I
Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language and Social
Interaction 44 (4): 317–337.
Weiste, Elina, Liisa Voutilainen, and Anssi Peräkylä
2016 “Epistemic
Asymmetries in Psychotherapy Interaction: Therapists’ Practices for Displaying Access to Clients’ Inner
Experiences.” Sociology of Health and
Illness 38 (4): 645–661.
Worsøe, Line
B., and Thomas
W. Jensen
2020 “Questioning
Questions in Psychotherapeutic Practice: The Dialogical Dynamics of Change in Therapy through Clients Questioning
Therapists.” Scandinavian Studies in
Language 11 (1): 279–317.
Yao, Xueli, and Wen Ma
2017 “Question
Resistance and Its Management in Chinese Psychotherapy.” Discourse
Studies 19 (2): 216–233.