Speech level shifts in Japanese: A different perspective. the application of symbolic interactionistrole theory

Yasuko Obana

Abstract

The present paper analyses speech level shifts in Japanese from a different perspective. By applying Symbolic InteractionistRole Theory, speech level shifts are categorised as the linguistic realisation of aninteractional role, or ‘dissociative role’ Icall in this paper. Dissociative roles are improvised identities, which occur when the speaker perceives a psychological change in relation to the other participant in the on-going interaction. Plus-level shifts (shifts from plain to polite forms, masu/desu) are triggered when the speaker experiences cautious, attentive, thoughtful and/or grateful feelings at a certaintime of interaction, which conforms to the original nature of honorifics. This prompts a dissociative role which creates a certain psychological distance between this role and the other interactant. On the other hand, minus-level shifts (shifts from masu/desu forms to plain forms) are the implementation of the speaker’s another dissociative role, which is assimilated with the other interactant, giving rise to empathy or drawing the other into the speaker’s world. Whether plus or minus level shifts occur, the interactants’social roles, i.e.,their original roles when the situation is defined, continue to exist throughout the discourse. The interactants are fully aware of their social roles such as teacher and student, friends, family members, and senior and junior in company(= Institutional Roles in this paper). However, when an Improvised Role is created, it is forwarded to the on-going interaction and linguistically implemented as a speech level shift.This paper also clarifies that both speech level shifts and the so-called ‘conventional’honorifics are situationally determined, and that they are not separate entities but the two ends of continuum by examining the features they share from the viewpoint of ‘roles’.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Altheide, L. David
(2000) Idendity and the definition of the situation in a mass-mediated context. Symbolic Interaction Vol. 23.1: 1-27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, and Sue Widdicombe
(1998) (eds.) Identities in Talk. London: Sage.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Asada, Hideko
(2001) Keigo de tokunihon no byodofubyodo [Equality and inequality in Japan by means of honorifics]. Tokyo: Kodansha Co.Google Scholar
Barke, Andrew
(2011) Situated functions of addressee honorifics in Japanese television drama. In B.L. Davies, M. Haugh, andA.J. Merrison (eds.), Situated Politeness, London: Continuum International Publishing Co., pp. 111-128.Google Scholar
Benwell, Bethan, and Elizabeth Stokoe
(2006) (reprinted 2007). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, Cristina
(2006) The Grammar of Society –The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert
(1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7.4-5: 585-614. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Burke, J. Peter
(ed.) (2006) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Burr, Vivien
(2002) The Person in Social Psychology. Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Chin, Bunshun
(2003) Doonendai no shotaimendooshiniyorukaiwanimirareru “da-tai” enoshifuto –shookisiyasuijookyoo to sonohindo o megutte [Shifts to da-style observed in conversations between new people of the same age group –Concerning their occurrence circumstances and frequencies]. Nihongo Kagaku 14: KokuritsuKokugoKenkyuujo, pp. 7-28.Google Scholar
Cook, Minegishi Haruko
(1996a) Japanese language socialization: Indexing the modes of self. Dicourse Processes 22: 171-197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996b) The use of addressee honorifics in Japanese elementary school classrooms. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki, andS. Strauss (eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics5. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 67-81.Google Scholar
(1997) The role of the Japanese masuform in caregiver-child conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 695-718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Style shifts in Japanese academic consultations. In K. Jones, and T. Ono (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 9-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Are honorifics polite? Uses of referent honorifics in a Japanese committee meeting. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3655-3672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(1981) Poison to your soul –thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine. The Hague: De Gruyter, pp. 69-91.Google Scholar
(2005) [reprinted 2010] Sociolinguistics –The Study of Speaker’s Choices. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, L. Bethan, Michael Haugh, and J. Andrew Merrison
(eds.) (2011) Situated Politeness. London: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Deckert, K. Sharon, and H. Caroline Vickers
(2011) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics –Society and Identity. London: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar
de Fina, Anna
(2010) The negotiation of identities. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 205-224.Google Scholar
de Fina, Anna, Deborah Schiffrin, and Michael Bamberg
(eds.) (2006) Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
(1997) Institutional dialogue. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, pp. 92-118.Google Scholar
Erdelyi, H. Matthew
(1994) Dissociation, defense, and the unconscious. In D. Spiegel (ed.), Dissociation –Culture, Mind, and Body. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press, Incorporation, pp. 3-20.Google Scholar
Gecas, Viktor and Peter J. Burke
(1995) Self and identity. In K.S. Cook, G.A. Fine, and J.S. House (eds.), Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 41-67.Google Scholar
Geyer, Naomi
(2008) Interpersonal functions of style shift: The use of plain and masuforms in faculty meetings. In K. Jones, and T. Ono (eds.), Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 39-70. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books (reprinted by Penguin Books, 1990).  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1963) Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michae I, and Yasuko Obana
(2011) Politeness in Japanese. In D.Z. Kádár, and S. Mills (eds.), Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147-175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, Makoto
(1999) Where grammar and interaction meet: A study of co-participant completion in Japanese conversation. Human Studies 22: 475 –499. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph
(2011) Following the Rules –Practical Reasoning and Deontic Constraint. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hewitt, P. John
(1989) Dilemmas of the American Self. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
(1991) Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hewitt, P. John, and David Shulman
(2003 [reprinted 2011]) Self and Society –A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology (eleventh edition, originally published in 2003). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino
(1986) Universals of linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347-371. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken
(2012) Disciplinary Identities –Individuality and Community in Academic Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
(1989) Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua 2: 223-248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Wakimae no Goyoo-ron [The pragmatics of wakimae]. Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Ikuta, Shoko
(1983) Speech level shift and conversational strategy in Japanese discourse. Language Science 5: 37-53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishizaki, Akiko
(2000) Denwarenraku no kaiwaniokerusupiichireberushifuto [Speech level shifts in message delivery on the phone]. Gengo Bunka to Nihongo Kyoiku, Ochanomizu Women’s College, Japanese and Culture Research Group, pp. 62-74.Google Scholar
Jones, Kimberly, and Tsuyoshi Ono
(eds.) (2008) Style Shifting in Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. Greer
(2006) The discursive construction of teacher identities in a research interview. In A. de Fina, D. Schiffrina, and M. Bamberg (eds.), Discourse and Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 213-232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, E. John
(2013) Identity work and face work across linguistic and cultural boundaries. Journal of Politeness Research 9.1: 35-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kinuhata, Tomohide, and Changsu Yang
(2007) Yakuwari-go toshiteno “guntai-go” no seiritsu [The development of military terms as role-terms]. In S. Kinsui (ed.), Yakuwari kenkyuu no chihei [The horizon of studies on role-terms].Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan, pp. 179-192.Google Scholar
Liddicoat, J. Anthony
(2004) The projectability of turn constructional units and the role of prediction in listening. Discourse Studies 6.4: 449-469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linguistic Politeness Research Group
(eds.) (2011) Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin/Boston: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Makino, Seiichi
(2002) When does communication turn mentally inward?: A case study of Japanese formal-to-informal switching. In N.M. Akatsuka, and S. Strauss (eds.), Japanese /Korean Linguistics, Vol. 10. California: CSLI Publications, pp. 121-135.Google Scholar
Maynard, K. Senko
(2001) Koisurufutari no kanjookotoba: Doramahyoogen no bunseki to nihongoron [Emotional language between the couple in love: Analysis of expressions in a drama and discussion on Japanese language]. Tokyo: KurosioShuppan.Google Scholar
(2004) Danwa Gengogaku [Linguistics of Discourse]. Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
McCall, J. George
(2003) Interaction. In L.T. Reynolds, and N.J. Herman-Kinney (eds.), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. California: AltaMira Press, pp. 327-348.Google Scholar
Mead, H. George
(1934) Mind, Self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. MedicineNet​.Com (2011) http://​www​.medterms​.com​/script​/main​/art​.asp​?articlekey​=38857Google Scholar
Megumi, Maeri
(2002) The switching between desu/masu form and plain form: From the perspective of turn construction. In N.M. Atatsuka, and S. Strass (eds.), Japanese Korean Linguistics 10: 206-234.Google Scholar
Miller, R. Elizabeth
(2013) Positioning selves, doing relational work and constructing identities ininterview talk. Journal of Politeness Research 9.1: 75-95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mimaki, Yoko
(1993) Danwa no tenkaihyooshikitoshitenotaiguureberushifuto [Speech level shifts as a marker of development of discourse]. Osaka Kyoiku University Kiyoo 1.42-1: 39-51.Google Scholar
Mullany, Louise
(2010) Gender and interpersonal pragmatics. In M.A. Locher, and S.L. Graham (eds.), Interpersonal Pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 225-250.Google Scholar
Nishida, Naotoshi
(1995) Keigo [Honorifics]. Tokyo: Tokyo-do Shuppan (the third print).Google Scholar
Norris, Sigrid
(2011) Identity in (Inter)action –Introducing Multimodal (Inter)action Analysis. Göttingen: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obana, Yasuko
(2000) Understanding Japanese: A Handbook for Learners and Teachers. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
(2012a) Politeness as role-identity-application of Symbolic Interactionism. Gengo to Bunka, Kwansei Gakuin University, Language & Education Research Centre 15: 1-16.Google Scholar
(2012b) Re-examination of yoroshikuonegaishimasu –The routine formula as the linguistic implementation of one’s tachiba-role. Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1535 -1548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohkubo, Kanako
(2009) Sonkeigo, kenjoogo no kinoonikansurukoosatsu –Kekkonhirooen noshikai no hatsuwa wo rei ni –[On the functions of deferential and humble terms –Examples from the wedding MC’s utterances –]. Shakai Gengo Kagaku 12.1: 162-173.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Shigeko
(1999) Situated politeness: Manipulating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversation. Pragmatics 9: 51-74. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2009) Politeness and perception of irony: Honorifics in Japanese. Metaphor and Symbol 17: 119-139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omoniyi, Tope, and Goodith White
(2006) Introduction. In T. Omoniyi, and G. White (eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Identity. London: Conitinuum, pp. 1-8.Google Scholar
Perinbanayagam, Robert
(2012) Identity’s Moments –The Self in Action and Interaction. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Saito, Junko
(2010) Subordinates’ use of Japanese plain forms: An examination of superior-subordinate interactions in the workplace. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3271-3282. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sandstrom, L. Kent, D. Daniel Martin, and Gary Alan Fine
(2010) Symbols, Selves, and Social Reality. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press (third edition).Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. Seth, Luyckx, Koen and Vignoles, L. Vivian
(eds.) (2012a) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, Volume 1. NewYork: Springer.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. Seth, Koen Luyckx, and L. Vivian Vignoles
(eds.) (2012b) Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, Volume 2. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
(2007) Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39.4: 639-656. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Raffel
(1999) Revisiting role theory: Roles and the problem of the self. http://​www​.socresonline​.org​.uk​/4​/2​/raffel​.html (Sociological Research Online)
Stryker, Sheldon
(2002) Traditional symbolic interactionism, role theory, and structural symbolic interactionism –The road to identity theory. In J.H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 211-231.Google Scholar
Takeda, Naoko
(2011) Dooitsudanwaniokerusupiichireberushifutonitsuite no koosatsu [On speech level shifts in the samd discourse]. MA dissertation, KwanseiGakuin University.Google Scholar
Turner, H. Jonathan
(2002) Face-to-Face: Toward a Theory of Interpersonal Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Extending the Symbolic Interactionist theory of interaction processes: A conceptual outline. Symbolic Interaction 34.3: 330-339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Symbolic interactionist theories of identity. In J.H. Turner (ed.), Contemporary SociologicalTheory. California: Sage Publications, pp. 331-355.Google Scholar
Turner, H. Ralph
(2002) Role theory. In J.H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 233-253.Google Scholar
Vryan, D. Kevin, Patricia A. Adler, and Peter Adler
(2003) Identity. In L.T. Reynolds and N.J. Herman-Kinney (eds.), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, INC., pp. 367-390.Google Scholar
Ylänne-McEwen, Virpi
(2004) Shifting alignment and negotiating sociality in travel agency discourse. Discourse Studies 6.6.4: 517-536. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, Mayumi, and Chikako Sakurai
(2005) Japanese honorifics as a marker of sociocultural identity. In R.T. Lakoff, and S. Ide (eds.), Broadening the Horizon of Linguistic Politeness. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsPublishing Company, pp. 197-215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar