How to do good things with words: A social pragmatics for survival

Jacob L. Mey
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua
(1971) Out of the pragmatic waste-basket. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 401-407.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Basil
(1971–1975) Class, codes and control. (3 vols.) London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981) Codes, modalities, and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. Language in Society 10: 327-363. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1990) The structuring of pedagogic discourse. ( = Class, codes and control, vol, 4). London & New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickhard, Mark & Robert Campbell
(1992) Some foundational questions concerning language studies: With a focus on categorial grammars and model theoretical possible worlds grammars. Journal of Pragmatics 17(5/6): 401-433. (Special Issue on ‘Foundational questions concerning language studies’). DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Jef Verschueren
(1991) ( = The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (Pragmatics & Beyond, New Series, vol. 6:3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
①
Bolinger, Dwight D
(1980) Language – the loaded weapon: The use and abuse of language today. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Britto, Francis
(1991) Tamil Diglossia: An interpretation. In Hudson (ed.), 1991: Stu dies in Dtglossia (= Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10, 60-84Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
(1942) Introduction to semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dillon, George L., Linda Coleman, Jeanne Fahnestock, and Michael Agar
(1985) Review article of (i.a.) Levinson (1983). Language 61.2: 446-460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dongoske, Kurt E., T.J. Ferguson & Michael Yeatts
(1994) Ethics of field research for the Hopi Tribe. Anthropology Newsletter 35.1: 56 (January). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C
(1993) A response to Ladefoged’s other view of endangered languages. Language 69.3: 575-579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drabble, Margaret
(1966) The Garrick Year. Harmondsworth: Penguin. [1964]Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(1992) The Samoan respect vocabulary. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp. 77-99.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
(1992a) Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
(1992b) Rethinking context: An introduction. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp. 3-42.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
(1979) The role of the reader. Bloomington, Ind.: The University of Indiana Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1972) A grammarian looks at socio-linguistics. [Quoted in Fillmore 1976: 90-Originally a paper given at the Georgetown University Round Table on Linguistics, GURT, 1971].
(1976) Pragmatics and the description of discourse. In Schmidt (ed.), 1976: Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2, 82-104.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
(1972) The archeology of knowledge. New York: Harper, (translated by A.M. Sheridan) [French original L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard 1969] .Google Scholar
Frank, Francine Wattman & Paula A. Treichler
(eds.) (1989) Language, Gender, and Professional Writing: Theoretical Approaches and Guidelines for Nonsexist Usage. New York: The Modern Language Association of America, Commission on the Status of Women in the Profession.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie H
(1992) Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, pp. 147-189.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
(1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 183-198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Bion
(1994) Report on CHAGS 7, Moscow, August 1993. Anthropology Newsletter 35.1: 12-14 (January).Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1992) Contextualization and understanding. In Duranti & Goodwin (eds.), pp. 229-252.Google Scholar
Haberland, Hartmut & Jacob L. Mey
(1977) Editorial: Pragmatics and linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics 1.1: 1-16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hager, Frithjof, Hartmut Habcrland & Rainer Paris
(1973) Soziologie + Linguistik. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken, Michael Krauss, Lucille J. Watahomigie & Akira Y. Yamamoto, Colette Craig, La Verne Masayesva Jeanne, & Nora C. England
(1992) Endangered languages. Language 68.1: 1-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hjclmslev, Louis
(1943) Omkringsprogteoriensgrundlœggelse. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (reprinted 1993)Google Scholar
Hjelmslev. Louis
(1954) Prolegomena to a theory of language. Baltimore: Waverly Press. (= Memoir 7 of the International Journal of American Linguistics) . (English translation by Francis J. Whitfield of Hjelmslev 1943).Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R
(1986) Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Georgetown Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1984. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.Google Scholar
(1988) Pragmatic theory. In F. Newmcyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Sun’ey. (Volume I, Linguistic Theory: Foundations). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113-45.Google Scholar
Hudson, Alan
(cd.) (1991) Stu dies in Dtglossia (= Southwest Journal of Linguistics 10(1)). Denton, Tex.: University of North Texas Press. [Reviewed by Jacob L. Mey (1993), Journal of Pragmatics 20.5: 493-505).Google Scholar
①
Kecnan, Elinor
[Ochs] (1976) On the universality of conversational implicatures. Languages and Society 5: 67-80.Google Scholar
Kummer, Werner
(1975) Grundlagen der Texttheorie: Zur handlungs-theoretischen Begründung einer materialistischen Sprachwissenschaft. Reinbek: Rowohlt. [1972]  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1976) Formale Pragmatik. In Schmidt (ed.), 1976: Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2, 9-52. [1973]Google Scholar
Lacoste, Michèle
(1981) The old lady and the doctor. Journal of Pragmatics 5.2: 169-180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
(1992) Another view of endangered languages. Language 68.4: 809-811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff. George
(1971) Presupposition and relative well-formedness. In Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in Philosophy, Linguistics, and Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 329-340. [1968]Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N
(1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson. Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maas, Utz
(1973a) Überblick über grundlegende pragmalinguistische Fragestellungen. In Hessisches Institut für Lehrerfortbildung 310: 4-36.Google Scholar
(1973b) Grundkurs Sprachwissenschaft I: Die herrschende Lehre. München: List.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L
(1974) Some practical aspects of a theory of performance. In Luigi Heilmann (ed.), Proceedings of the Kith International Congress of Linguists 1972. Bologna: 11 Mulino. pp. 111-123.Google Scholar
(1976) Qualification, emancipatory language use and pragmatic linguistics. In Fred Karlsson (ed.), Papers from the Third Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Turku: Academy of Finland, pp. 275-284.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1979) Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1981) Right or wrong, my Native Speaker. In Florian Coulmas (ed.), A Festschrift for Native Speaker. The Hague: Mouton, pp. 69-84.Google Scholar
(1987) The dark horse of linguistics: Two recent books on pragmatics. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 20: 157-172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Between rules and principles: Some thoughts on the notion of “Metapragmatic Constraint”. Symposium on Metapragmatic Terms, Budapest, July 2–4, 1990. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientianim Hungaricae 39: 1-6.
(1993) Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) (in presst) Artificial intelligence in the fourth millennium’. In Petr Sgall et al.. (eds.), Festschrift Eva Hajicovâ. Prague.Google Scholar
(1994) (in press2) What’s in the data?. In Jens Elmegaard Rasmussen (ed.), Festschrift J0rgen Rischel. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
Morris, Charles H
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (= Rudolf Carnap et al.., (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 2 : 1).  BoPGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara H
(1972) Opacity, coreference, and pronouns. In Donald Davidson & Gilbert Harman (eds.). Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 415-441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillipson, Robert & Tove Skutnabb-Kangas
(1994) Linguicide. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford & Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier. Vol. 4: 2211-2212.Google Scholar
Pinxten, Rik
(1991) Fieldwork as a form of intercultural communication. In Blommaert & Verschueren (eds.), pp. = The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication, 131-144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Roland
(1990) Mitteilungen an die ferne Zukunft. In R. Posner (ed.), Warnungen an die ferne Zukunft: Atommüll als Kommunikationsproblem. München: Raben, pp. 27-68.Google Scholar
Proclus
(1901) Hypotyposis astronomicarum positionum. Leipzig: Teubner. [Characteristics of the positions of the heavenly bodies; orig. in Greek, ca. 455 A. D.]Google Scholar
Rischel, Jorgen
(1989) Fieldwork among spirits. Journal of Pragmatics 13.6: 861-869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert
(1964) Constraints on variables in syntax. [MIT Ph.D. dissertation; reprinted 1984 as Syntax!]
(1975) Where to do things with words. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts. New York, San Francisco & London: Academic Press, pp. 233-256.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Siegfried J
(ed.) (1976) Pragmatik 1 Pragmatics 2. München: Fink.Google Scholar
① ②
Searle, John R
(1969) Speech acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wille, Niels Erik & Peter Harms Larsen
(1970) Introduktion til pragmatik og pragmatisk analyse. In H.A. Koefoed (ed.), Grammatik, Pragmatik & Tekstbeskrivelse. Nydanske Studier 2: 41-114.Google Scholar
Versteueren, Jef
(1981) Review of Bolinger (1980). Journal of Pragmatics 5.2/3: 295-298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
(1994) The pragmatic return to meaning. (Unpublished MS)
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin & Don D. Jackson
(1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
(1970) Die Rolle der Pragmatik in der Linguistik. Der Deutschunterricht 22.4: 5-41.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Utz Maas
(1972) Pragmatik und sprachliches Handeln. Mit einer Kritik am Funkkolleg ‘Sprache’. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Haruhiko
(1994) Unrepeatable sentences: Contextual influence on speech and thought representation. In Herman Parret (ed.), 1994. Pretending to communicate. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter. pp. 238-253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar