Tang’s Dilemma and other problems: Ethnification processes at some multicultural workplaces

Dennis Day
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Allwood, J
(1984) On relevance in spoken interaction. In S. Backman, & B. Kjellmer (eds.), Papers on Language and Literature. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgsis, 18-35.Google Scholar
Allwood, J., Franker, G., Kós-Dienes, D
(1985) Förförstaelse och attityder i arbetslivet och syddsfrägor. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics 15. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict
(1983) Imagined communities: Some reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrik
(1969) Ethnic groups and boundaries : The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Oslo University.Google Scholar
Bergman, L., Hedencrona, E., Kós-Dienes, D
(1988) Samarbete, förstaelse och attityder – Fallstudier i tvärkulturell kommunikation pâ svenska arbetsplatser. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics 18. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).Google Scholar
Bilmes, J
(1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J
(1988) Intercultural communication and objects of adaptation. IPrA working document 3: 61-70.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., & J. Verschueren
(1992) The role of language in European nationalist ideologies. Pragmatics 2: 355-376.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) (1991) The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
de Certeau, M
(1988) The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Day, Dennis
(1993) Multiculturality in practice. In D. Kós-Dienes (ed.), Multiculturality: Warfare or welfare? Göteborg: KIM, 189-202.Google Scholar
forthcoming a) Communication in context at a multicultural workplace. Stockholm: DEIFO (Delegation for Immigrant Research, Ministry of Labor).
forthcoming b) Communication in a multicultural workplace: Procedural matters. Proceedings of the L.A.U.D. Symposium on Intercultural Communication 1992. Duisburg: University of Duisburg.
forthcoming c) Talk as data, talk as method. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference of Scandinavian Linguistics. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
forthcoming d) The culture of intercultural communication. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Conference of Scandinavian Linguistics. Göteborg: Göteborg University.
Duranti, A., & C. Goodwin
(eds.) (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gudykunst, W
(ed.) (1986) Intergroup communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Heritage, J
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford: Polity Press and Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hinnenkamp, V
(1987) Foreigner talk, code switching and the concept of trouble. In H. Knapp et al.. (eds.), Analyzing intercultural communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) “Turkish Man You?” The conversational accomplishment of the social and ethnic category of Turkish guestworker. Human Studies 12: 117-146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Talking a person into interethnic distinction: a discourse analytic case study. In J. Blommaert & J. Verschueren (eds.), The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 91-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G
(1980) Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Hooper, Robert
(1986) Speech evaluation of intergroup dialect differences: The shibboleth schema. In W. Gudykunst (ed.), Intergroup communication. Baltimore: Edward Arnold, 127-136.Google Scholar
Kós-Diencs, D
(1987) Communicative situations and language choice at Swedish working places. Papers in Anthropological Linguistics 17. (Dept. of Linguistics, Göteborg University).Google Scholar
Levinson, S
(1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66-100.Google Scholar
Moerman, M
(1974) Accomplishing ethnicity. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Middlesex: Penguin, 54-68.Google Scholar
Pollner, M
(1974) Sociological and common-sense models of the labelling process. In Roy Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Middlesex: Penguin, 27-40.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M., & M. Taylor
(1992) Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G.R. Semlin, & Klaus Fiedler (eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition. London: Sage, 11-36.Google Scholar
Sacks, H
(1972) On the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston, 325-345.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., & E.A. Schegloff
(1979) Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 15-21.Google Scholar
Schenkien. J
(1978) Identity negotiations in conversation. In J. Schenkien (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B., & E. Ochs
(1986) Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., J. Lele, & G. Martohardjono
(1988) Communication in a multilingual society: Some missed opportunities. Language in Society 17: 43-59. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scott, i.C
(1985) Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Spicer, E.M
(1940) Pascua: A Yaqui of Arizona. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Varonis, E., & S. Gass
(1985) Miscommunication in native/non-native conversations. Language in Society 14: 327-343. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev
(1962) Thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wieder, D. Lawrence, & Steven Piatt
(1990) On being a recognizable Indian. In Donal Carbaugh (ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact. Englewood Cliffs: Lawrence Erlbaum. 45-64.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D., & M. Pollner
(1971) The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Douglas (ed.), Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 80-103.Google Scholar