Pragmatics in the late twentieth century: Countering recent historiography neglect

Jon F. Pressman

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Bauman, Richard
(1977) Verbal Art as Performance. Prospect Heights, 111.: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles Briggs
(1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59-88. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard
(1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2(2): 131-172. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko
(1993) Reported speech and affect on Nukulaelae Atoll. In Jane Hill and Judith Irvine (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 161-181.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1988) [1984] Homo Academicus, Peter Collier (trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles
(1984) Learning how to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and the incompetence of fieldworkers. Language in Society 13(1): 1-28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985a) Treasure tales and pedagogical discourse in Mexicano New Mexico. Journal of American Folklore 98(389): 287-314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985b) The pragmatics of proverb performances in New Mexican Spanish. American Anthropologist 87(4): 793-810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Learning How to Ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interx’iew in social scientific research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988a) Competence in Performance: The Creativity of Tradition in Mexicano Verbal Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988b) Disorderly dialogues in ritual impositions of order: The role of metapragmatics in Warao dispute mediation. Anthropological Linguistics 30(3/4): 448-491.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992a) “Since I am a woman, I will chastise my relatives”: Gender, reported speech, and the (re)production of social relations in Warao ritual wailing. American Ethnologist 19(2): 337-361. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Linguistic ideologies and the naturalization of power in Warao discourse. Pragmatics 2(3): 387-404.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993a) Generic versus metapragmatic dimensions of Warao narratives: Who regiments performance? In J Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 179-212. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993b) Metadiscursive practices and scholarly authority in folkloristics. Journal of American Folklore 106(422): 387-434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993c) “I’m not just talking to the victims of opression tonight – I’m talking to everybody”: Rhetorical Authority and Narrative Authenticity in an African-American Poetics of Political Engagement. Journal of Narrative and Life History 3(1): 33-78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) The sting of the ray: Bodies, agency, and grammar in Warao curing. Journal of American Folklore 107(423): 139-166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruss, Elizabeth
(1978) Peirce and Jakobson on the nature of the sign. In R. Bailey, L. Matejka and P. Steiner (eds.), The Sign: Semiotics Around the World, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 81-98.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
(1990) [1934]. Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, D. Goodwin (trans.). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caton, Steve
(1987) Contributions of Roman Jakobson. Annual Review of Anthropology 16: 223-260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Speech styles, status, and speaker awareness. Semiotica vol 80 (1/2): 153-160.Google Scholar
(1993) The importance of reflexive language in George H. Mead’s theory of self and communication. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315-337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, Regna
(1974) Readings in the History of Anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
(1990) Edward Sapir: Linguist, Anthropologist, Humanist. Berkeley: University of California Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
(1972) The Dyirbal Language of Northern Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(1994) From Grammar to Politics: Linguistic Anthropology in a Western Samoan Village. Berkeley: University of California Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Errington, J. Joseph
(1985) On the nature of the sociolinguistic sign: Describing the Javanese speech levels. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 287-310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Structure and Style in Javanese: A Semiotic View of Linguistic Etiquette. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Paul
(1986) The Language Parallax: Linguistic Relativism and Poetic Indeterminacy. Austin: University of Texas Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald
(1979) Pragmatics: Implicative, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gorlée. Dinda
(1992) Translation after Jakobson after Peirce. In E. Tarasti (ed.), Center and Periphery in Representations and Institutions. Imatra: International Semiotics Institute, 55-82.Google Scholar
Hanks, William
(1990) Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1993) Metalanguage and pragmatics of deixis. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language-Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127-157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane
(1992) Anthropological Linguistics. In W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 65-68.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane and Bruce Mannheim
(1992) Language and worldview. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 381-406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell
(1968) [1962] The ethnography of speaking. In J. Fishman (ed.), Readings in the Sociology of Language, 99-138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1974) [1964] Towards ethnographies of communication. In Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Piladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 3-27.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) [1970] Linguistic theory and gunctions of dpeech. In Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 145-178.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1974) [1972] Studying the interaction of language and social life. In Foundations in Sociolingistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 29-66.Google Scholar
(1974) Ways of Speaking. In R. Bauman and J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433-451Google Scholar
(1975) The Pre-War Prague School and Post-War American Anthropological Linguistics. In K. Kocrner (ed.), The Transformational-Generative Paradigm and Modern Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 359-380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Essays in the History of Linguistic Anthropology. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 350-377.Google Scholar
(1965) Quest for the essence of language. Diogenes 51: 21-37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1971) [1957] Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In Selected Writings II: Word and language. The Hague: Mouton, 130-147.Google Scholar
(1971) [1963] Efforts toward a means-ends model of language in interwar continental linguistics. In Selected Writings II, pp. 522-526. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
(1971) [1968] Language in relation to other communication systems. In Selected Writings. The Hague: Mouton, 697-708.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1976) A few remarks on structuralism. MLN 91: 1534-1539. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1977) A few remarks on Peirce, pathfinder in the science of language. MLN 92: 1026-1032. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985) [1956] Metalanguage as a linguistic problem. In S. Rudy (ed.), Selected Writings VII: Contributions to Comparative Mythology, Studies in Linguistics and Philology, 1972–1982. Berlin: Mouton, 113-121.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
(1990) Wilhelm Von Humboldt and North American ethnolinguistics. Historiographia Linguistica 17(1/2): 111-128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Towards a history of modern sociolinguistics. American Speech 66(1): 57-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul
, et al. (eds.) (1992) Special issue on language ideologies. Pragmatics 2(3).Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
(1980) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levi-Strauss, Claude
(1955) The structural study of myth. Journal of American Folklore 68(270): 428-444. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liszka, Jakob
(1981) Peirce and Jakobson: Towards a structuralist reconstruction of Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 27(1): 41-61.Google Scholar
Lucy, John
(1992a) Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992b) Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Reflexive language and the human disciplines. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9-32. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce
(1986) Popular song and popular grammar: Poetry and metalanguage. Word 37(1–2): 45-75.
May, Jacob
(1993) Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
McDowell, John
(1986) Folkloristics. In T. Sebeok (ed.), Encyclopedic Dictionary of Semiotics, Volume 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 261-267,Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth
(1985) Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertzand R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 1-19,  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Learning what to ask: Metapragmatic factors and methodological reification, In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159-174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Omar and David Olmstead
(1954) Language and Professor Levi-Strauss. American Anthropologist 54: 116-119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Charles
(1938) Foundations of the theory of signs. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Volume 1, no. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mounin, Georges
(1974) Levi-Strauss’ use of linguistics. In I. Rossi (ed.), The Unconscious in Culture. New York: E.P. Dutton, 31-52.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles
(1931) Collected Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petrilli, Susan
(1992) Translation, semiotics and ideology. TTR 5(1): 223-264. Crossref  TSBGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jon F
(1991) Feathers of Blood and Fire: The mythological origins of Avian Coloration. In R. Reina and K. Kensinger (eds.), The Gift of Birds: Featherwork of Native South American Peoples. Philadelphia: The University Museum, 78-91.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
(1972) Chinook Jargon: Language contact and the problem of multilevel generative systems, I, II, Language 48: 378-406, 596-625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1974) Dialectal developments in Chinookan tense-aspect systems, an areal-historical analysis. UAL 40, 4(2).Google Scholar
(1975a) Linguistics and anthropology. In R. Bartsch and T. Vennemann (eds.), Linguistics and Neighboring Disciplines. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company, 157-170.Google Scholar
(1975b) La semiotique Jakobsonienne et l’anthropologie sociale. L’Arc 60: 45-49.Google Scholar
(1976a) Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical o categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 112-171.Google Scholar
(1976b) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 11-55.Google Scholar
(1977) Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. In M. Saville-Troike (ed.), Linguistics and Anthropology. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 139-151.Google Scholar
(1978) Deixis and deducibility in a Wasco-Wishram passive of evidence. In A. Woodbury et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 238-253.Google Scholar
(1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In P. Clyne et al. (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 193-207.Google Scholar
(1981a) Case-marking and the nature of language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 227-244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1981b) The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, no. 84. Austin: Southwestern Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
(1984) On the pragmatic ‘poetry’ of prose: Parallelism, repetition, and cohesive structure in the time course of dyadic conversation. In D. Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 181-199.Google Scholar
(1985a) The culture of language in Chinookan narrative texts; or, On saying that… in Chinook. In J. Nichols and A. Woodbury (eds.), Grammar inside and outside the clause: Some approaches from the field. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132-171.Google Scholar
(1985b) The functional stratification of language and ontogenesis. In J. Wertsch (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 205-235.Google Scholar
(1985c) Noun phrase categorical markedness and syntactic parametricization. In S. Choi et al.. (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Buffalo: SUNY Press, 337-361.Google Scholar
(1985d) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives, 119-257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986a) Classifiers, verb classifiers, and verbal categories. In D. Feder et al.. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 497-514.Google Scholar
(1986b) The diachrony of Sapir’s synchronic linguistic description; or, Sapir’s ‘cosmographical’ linguistics. In W. Cowan et al. (eds.), New Perspectives in Language, Culture, and Personality: Proceedings of the Edward Sapir Centenary Conference. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 67-106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1987a) The three faces of ‘function’: Preliminaries to a psychology of language. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Orlando: Academic Press, 17-38.Google Scholar
(1987b) Cognitive implications of a referential hierarchy. In M. Hickmann (ed.), Social and Functional Approaches to Language and Thought. Orlando: Academic Press, 125-164.Google Scholar
(1987c) Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In Working Papers and Proceedings of the Center for Psychosocial Studies 13: 1-24.Google Scholar
(1989) “Singularly like our ideal of a scientist.” In M. Ritchie Key and Henry Hoenigswald (eds.), General and Amerindian Ethnolinguistics: In Remembrance of Stanly Newman. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 45-63.Google Scholar
(1991) Problems of Sapir’s historiography. Historiographia Linguistica vol 28 (1): 181-204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33-58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, Peter
(1978) The conceptual basis of Prague structuralism. In L. Matejka (ed.), Sound, sign and meaning: Quinquagenary of the Prague Linguistic Circle. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 351-3385.Google Scholar
Turner, Terence
(1977) Narrative structure and mythopoesis: A critique and reformulation of structuralist concepts of myth, narrative and poetics. Arethusa 10(1): 103-163.Google Scholar
Urban, Greg
(1981) Agent – and patient-centricity in myth. Journal of American Folklore 94(373): 323-344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1984) Speech about speech in speech about action. Journal of American Folklore 97(385): 310-328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985a) Ergativity and accusativity in Shokleng (Gê). International Journal of American Linguistics 51(2): 164-187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1985b) The semiotics of two speech styles in Shokleng. In E. Mertz and R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic Mediation: Sociocultural and Psychological Perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, 311-328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986a) Ceremonial dialogues in South America. American Anthropologist 88(2): 371-386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986b) The semiotic function of macro-parallelism in the Shokleng Origin Myth. In J. Sherzer and G. Urban (eds.), Native South American Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 15-57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) The pronominal pragmatics of nuclear war discourse. Multilingua 7(1/2): 67-93. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) The “I” of Discourse. In B. Lee and G. Urban (eds.). Semiotics, Self and Society. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27-51.Google Scholar
(1991) A Discourse-Centered Approach to Culture: Native South American Myths and Rituals. Austin: University of Texas.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Semiotics and anthropological linguistics. In W. Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3, Oford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1993) The represented functions of speech in Shokleng myth. In John Lucy (ed.), Reßexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241-260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urban, Greg and Joel Sherzer
(1988) The linguistic anthropology of native South America. Annual Review of Anthropology 17: 283-307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
(1994) The pragmatic perspective. In J. Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jan Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics: Manual. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1-22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar