On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation

Margret Selting

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Auer, Peter
(1991) Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift ßr Germanistische Linguistik 19: 139-157.Google Scholar
(1992) The neverending sentence: Rightward expansion in spoken language. In: M. Kontra & T. Vâradi (eds.), Studies in spoken language: English, German, Finno-Ugric. Budapest:, pp. 41-59.Google Scholar
(1996) On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(1996) Rhythmus und Tempo konversationeller Alltagssprache. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 96: 78-106.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Aldo di Luzio
(eds.) (1992) The contextualization of language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
(1986) Intonation and its parts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) Intonation and its uses. London: Edward Arnold.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Antonie & Johan t’Hart
(1967) On the anatomy of intonation. Lingua 19: 177-192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(1993) English speech rhythm. Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Margret Selting
(1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodie perspective on interaction. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(eds.) (1996) Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
(1979) Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In: S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (eds.), Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk. London, New York: Longman, pp. 153-166.Google Scholar
DuBois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cummings & Danae Paolino
(1993) Outline of Discourse Transcription. In: J.A Edwards & M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data. Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale etc.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-89.Google Scholar
Essen, Otto von
(1964) Grundzüge der hochdeutschen Satzintonation. Ratingen: Henn.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara A Fox & Sandra A Thompson
(1995) Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited. Draft prepared for the Symposium on Grammar and Interaction, August 23–26, 1995, Odense University, Denmark.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John
(1982) Discourse strategies. London: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Ethnography in urban communication. In: P. Auer & A di Luzio (eds.), Interpretive sociolinguistics. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1990) Contextualization and understanding. In: A Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.Google Scholar
(1992) Contextualization revisited. In: P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), pp. The contextualization of language, 39-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action. Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299-345.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia & Gregory Ward
(1992) The influence of pitch range, duration, amplitude and spectral features on the interpretation of the rise-fall-rise intonation contour in English. Journal of Phonetics 20: 241-251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24: 407-412. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
(1988) Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik. In: H. Altmann (ed.), (1988) Intonationsforschungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 89-134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1979) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In: J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 219-248.Google Scholar
(1986) Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies 9: 153-183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
(1980) The structure of intonational meaning. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Local, John
(1992) Continuing and restarting. In: P. Auer & A di Luzio (eds.), pp. 273-296.Google Scholar
Local, John & John Kelly
(1986) Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185-204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John, John Kelly & William H.G. Wells
(1986) Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics 22: 411-437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Local, John, William H.G. Wells & Mark Sebba
(1985) Phonology for conversation. Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 309-330. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Julia Hirschberg
(1990) The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: P.R. Cohen & J. Morgan (eds.), Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 271-311.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Sidney Greenbaum
(1978) A university grammar of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1971) Das Erzählen von Geschichten innerhalb von Unterhaltungen. In: R. Kjolseth & F. Sack (eds.), Zur Soziologie der Sprache. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 307-314. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1986) Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics 15: 127-138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel ASchegloff & Gail Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In: T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-286.Google Scholar
(1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk.Google Scholar
Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics
1981Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1982, pp. 71-91.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction. An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychological Quarterly 50.2: 101-114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In: D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, pp. 135-158.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
(1995a) Prosodie im Gespräch. Aspekte einer interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995b) Der ‘mögliche Satz’ als interaktiv relevante syntaktische Kategorie. Linguistische Berichte 158: 298-325.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
(1989) Methodologische Aspekte der linguistischen Analyse von Gesprächen. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42.2: 192-207.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(1979) What’s in an frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In: R.O. Freedle (ed.), New directions in discourse processing. Norwood: Ablex, pp. 137-181.Google Scholar
Uhmann, Susanne
(1991) Fokusphonologie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
(1993) Das Mittelfeld im Gespräch. In: M. Reis (ed.), Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer, pp. 313-354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Bill & Sue Peppé
(1996) Ending up in Ulster. In: E. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (eds.).Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies, CrossrefGoogle Scholar