Four-party conversation and gender

Astrid Berrier

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
André-Larochebouvy, Danielle
(1984) La conversation quotidienne. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Bange, Pierre
(1992) Analyse conversationnelle et théorie de l’action. Paris: Hatier, LAL.Google Scholar
Bernage, Berthe
(1953) Convenances et bonnes manières. Paris: Gauthier Languereau.Google Scholar
Berrier, Astrid
(1990) Tours de parole: Théorie conversationnelle et pratique en français langue seconde au niveau universitaire. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Toronto: University of Toronto.
(1993) Pratiques interactives: évaluation possible? Le Français dans le monde. Recherches et applications, août-sept.: 92-109.Google Scholar
(1994a) Se sécuriser en conversation: esquisse de stratégies. Enjeux 33: 129-136.Google Scholar
(1994b) Politesse et conversation: les femmes dans l’Entre-deux. Actes du Colloque sur l’Entre-deux. Rabat. To be published.Google Scholar
(1995) Au-delà de l’approche com m unicative: La prise de parole en français langue seconde. Saint-Laurent: Tré-Carré.Google Scholar
B errier, Astrid
(1997) “S’opposer dans une conversation à quatre: de quelques moyens.” La Revue québécoise de linguistique. To be published.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
, and al. (1989) Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex Pub.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Robert
(1984) De l’analyse conversationnelle à l’évaluation de l’oral en classe. Le Français dans le monde 186, juillet: 33-41.Google Scholar
(1987) Structuration et conflits de structuration. In J. Cosnier & C. Kerbrat-Orecchioni (eds.), Décrire la conversation. Presses Universitaires de Lyon: pp. 73-104.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(1981) Poison to our soul: thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routines. The Hague: Mouton Pub: pp. 69-91.Google Scholar
Coulon, Alain
(1987) L’Ethnométhodologie. Paris: Puf. Que Sais-je.Google Scholar
Edelsky, Carole
(1981) Who’s got the floor? Language in society 10: 383-421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, Pamela
(1983) Interaction: the work women do. In Barry Thorne, C. Kramarae and N. Henley (eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Pub.: pp. 89-101.Google Scholar
Folcalvez, Françoise Le
(1967) A.B.C. du savoir-vivre. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1974) Les Rites d’interaction. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
(1987) Répliques et réponses. Façons de parler. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Kasper, Gabriele, and M. Dahl
(1991) Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in second language acquisition, 13: 215-247. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine
(1994) “Notes sur le fonctionnement du trilogue”. Littérature 93, février. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
et al. (1995) Le Trilogue. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.Google Scholar
Léard, Jean-Marcel
(1989) Les mots du discours: variété et enchaînement au niveau sémantique, Revue québécoise de linguistique 18.1: 85-108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mchoul, Alexander
(1978) The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom Language in Society 7: 183-213. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
(1982) The structure of classroom events and their consequences for student performance. In P. Gilmore and A. Glatthorn (eds.), Children in and out of School; Ethnography and Education. W ashington D.C.: CAL: 59-87.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4: 696-735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emmanuel and H. Sacks
(1974) Opening up closings. In R. Turner (ed.), Ethnomethodology. Harmondsworth, Penguin: 233-263.Google Scholar
Shultz, J., S. Florio, and F. Erickson
(1982) Where’s the floor? aspects of the cultural organization of social relationships in comm unication at hom e and at schoo l. In P. Gilmore and A. Glatthorn (eds.), Children in and out of School; Ethnography and Education. Washington D.C.: CAL: 88-123.Google Scholar
Traverso, Véronique
(1995) Gestion des échanges dans les conversations à trois participants. Le trilogue. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon: pp. 29-53.Google Scholar
Whalen, Marilyn, and D. Zimmerman
(1987) Sequential and institutional contexts in calls for help. The Social psychology quarterly 50.2: 172-185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
W ierzbicka, Anna
(1985) Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 145-178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1991) Cross Cultural Pragmatics The Semantics of Human Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa
(1983) Rules of speaking. Language and communication. Richards, J. and R. Schmidt. London: Longman: pp. 60-87.Google Scholar
Zamouri, Salwa
(1995) La formation de coalitions dans les conversations triadiques. Le trilogue. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon: pp. 54-79.Google Scholar