Discursive hegemony in the Kennedy Smith rape trial: Evidence of an age graded allusion in expert testimony

Gregory M. Matoesian

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Arminen, Ilkka
(1996) On the moral and interactional relevancy of self-repairs for life stories of members of alcoholics anonymous. Text 16.4: 449-480.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. Maxwell
(1978) Discovering suicide: Studies in the social organization of sudden death. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Besnier, Niko
(1990) Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 419-451. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles
(1984) Learning to ask: Native metacommunicative competence and the incompetence of field workers. Language in Society 13.1: 1-28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham
(1992) Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in job interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212-231.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, Justine Coupland, & Howard Giles
(1991) anguage, society, and the elderly. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1992) Contested evidence in the courtroom: The case of a trial for rape. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 470-520.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul & John Heritage
(1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-65.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
(eds.) (1992) Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Editors
(1995) Confronting the new challenges of scientific evidence. Harvard Law Review 108: 1481-1603. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz
(1982) The counselor as gatekeeper. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Charles
(1977) Baby talk as a simplified register. In C. Snow & C. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to children. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209-235.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1994) Transparent vision. American Anthropologist 93.3: 606-633. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness & Charles Goodwin
(1986) Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62.1/2: 51-75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haydock, Roger & John Sonsteng
(1990) Trial theories, tactics, and techniques. St. Paul: West.Google Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena
(1984) Categorization and the moral order. Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1974) Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society 2: 181-199. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Carol
(1994) Expert witnesses. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Elizabeth
(1993) Correction/repair as a resource for co-construction of group competence. Pragmatics 3.4: 411-423.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
(1990/1991) Beyond mundane reason: Conversation analysis and context. Research on language and social interaction 24: 333-350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory
(1993) Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1995) Language, law, and society: Policy implications of the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Society Review 29.4: 669-701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997a) `You were interested in him as a person?’: Rhythms of domination in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. Law and Social Inquiry 22.1: 55-93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) `I’m sorry we had to meet under these circumstances’: Verbal artistry (and wizardry) in the Kennedy Smith rape trial. In M. Travers & J. Manzo (eds.), Law in action: Ethnomethodological and conversation analytic approaches to law. London: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Mauet, Thomas
(1996) Trial techniques. 4th. edition. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elisabeth
(1985) Beyond symbolic anthropology: Introducing semiotic mediation. In E. Mertz & R. Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Language, law, and social meaning: Linguistic/anthropological contributions to the study of law. Law and Society Review 26: 413-45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Linguistic ideology and praxis in U.S. law school classrooms. Pragmatics 3.2: 325-34.Google Scholar
O’Barr, William
(1982) Linguistic evidence. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Joseph
(1987) Use of forensic evidence by the police and courts. Research in brief. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Justice, pp. 1-6. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Joseph, John Ryan, Pauline Houlden, and Steven Mihajlovic
(1987) The uses and effects of forensic science in the adjudication of felony cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32.6: 1730-1753. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renoe, Curtis E
(1996) Seeing is believing?: Expert testimony and the construction of interpretative authority in an American trial. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 9.26: 115-137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation, Vol.1. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael & Richard Duizend
(1983) The use of scientific evidence in litigation.Washington, D.C.: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanual
(1979) The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261-286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, & Harvey Sacks
(1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361-382. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
(1981) The limits of awareness. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 84. Austin: Southwest Educational Lab.Google Scholar
(1993) Metapragmatic discourse and the metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (ed.), Reflexive language. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33-58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Rod
(1996) Some general reflections on Categorization’ and Sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In S. Hester & P. Eglin (eds.), Culture in action. Washington D.C.: University Press of America, pp. 49-75.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q
(1997) Moral judgment. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn
(1993) Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics 2.3: 235-249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn & Bambi Schieffelin
(1994) Language ideology. In W. Durham, E. Daniel, & B. Schieffelin (eds.), Annual Review of Anthropology. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews Inc., 23: 55-82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar