Computer-mediated communication and scholarly discourse: Forms of topic-initiation and thematic development

Helmut Gruber
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Baym, N
(1995) The emergence of community in computer mediated communication. In St. Jones (ed), pp. Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community, 138-164.Google Scholar
Bilmes, J
(1988) The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 17: 161-181. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & St. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collot, M. & N. Belmore
(1996) Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. Herring (ed), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 13-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DuBartell, D
(1995) Discourse features of computer-mediated communication: ‘Spoken like’ and ‘written like’. In B. Warvik, S.-K. Tanskanen, & R. Hiltunen (eds), Organization in discourse. Proceedings from the Turku Conference. Turku: University of Turku, pp. 231-241.Google Scholar
Eklundh, K.S
(1986) Dialogue processes in computer mediated communication. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 6.Google Scholar
Garton, L. & B. Wellman
(1995) Social impacts of electronic mail in organizations: A review of the research literature. Communication Yearbook 18: 434-453.Google Scholar
Gruber, H
(1996) Streitgespräche. Zur Pragmatik einer Diskursform. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
(1997a) E-mail discussion lists: A new genre of scholarly communication? In Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 60-61: 24-43.Google Scholar
(1997b) Thematische Progression in Internet Diskussionslisten. In R. Weingarten (ed.), Sprachwandel durch den Computer. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 70-93.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
(1994) An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Herring, S
(1996a) Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in CMC. In Ch. Ess (Ed), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 115-147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
①
(1996b) Linguistic and critical analysis of computer-mediated communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations. To appear in Jim Thomas (ed.), The information society. (special issue on “The ethics of fair practices for collecting social science data in cyberspace”) 12/2: 153-168.Google Scholar
(1996c) Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. Herring (ed), pp. Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication, 81-109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1996) Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam. John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
① ② ③
Jones, St
(ed.) (1995) Cybersociety. Computer-mediated communication and community. London: Sage.Google Scholar
①
Jones, R. & R. Spiro
(1995) Contextualization, cognitive flexibility, and hypertext: The convergence of interpretive theory, cognitive psychology, and advanced information technologies. In S. Star (ed.), The cultures of computing. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 146-158.Google Scholar
Korenman, J. & N. Wyatt
(1996) Group dynamics in an e-mail forum. In S. Herring (ed.), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 225-243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, H
(1993) Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193-216. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lea, M
. et al. (1992) “Flaming” in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (ed.), pp. Contexts of computer-mediated communication, 89-113.Google Scholar
(ed.) (1992) Contexts of computer-mediated communication. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
①
Leech, G. & M. Short
(1981) Style in fiction. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Levinson, St
(1984) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I
(1990) A three-step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue. In I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.), The dynamics of dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 129-147.Google Scholar
Ng, S.H., M. Brooke, & M. Dunne
(1995) Interruption and influence in discussion groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14.4: 369-382. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ng, S.H. & J. Bradac
(1993) Power in language. London: Sage. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs-Keenan, E. & B. Schieffelin
(1976) Topic as a discourse notion: A study of topic in the conversations of children and adults. In Ch.N. Li (ed.), Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press, pp. 225-385.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), pp.57-102.Google Scholar
Reid, E
(1994) Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. University of Melbourne: MA-Thesis.
Ruedenberg, L., D. Brenda, & Y. Rosenbaum-Tamari
(1995) Virtual virtuosos: Play and performance at the computer keybord. EJC: Electronic Journal of Communication 5.4: 1995.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
(1974) A simpliest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50: 697-735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shields, R
(ed.) (1996) Cultures of Internet. Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Star, L
(ed.) (1995) The culture of computing. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uhlirova, L
(1994) e-mail as a new subvariety of medium and its effects upon the message. In S. Cmerjrkova & F. Stich (eds.), The syntax of sentence and text (Festschrift for F. Danes). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yates, S
(1996) Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. In S. Herring (ed.), pp. Computer-mediated communication. Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives, 29-47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wetzstein, Th
. et al. (1995) Datenreisende. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar