Intelligence as a sensitive topic in clinical interviews prompted by learning difficulties

Michèle Grossen and Denis Apothéloz

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Apothéloz, D. & P.-Y. Brandt
(1992) Relation d’étayage: Justification et/ou explication? Travaux du Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques 60: 55-88. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel, Centre de Recherches Sémiologiques.Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D., P.-Y. Brandt & G. Quiroz
(1993) The function of negation in argumentation. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 23-38. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Apothéloz, D. & M. Grossen
(1996) Dynamique conversationnelle dans un entretien psychothérapeutique: Analyse des reformulations. Interaction & Cognitions 1.1: 115-149.Google Scholar
Bergmann, J
(1989) Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.), Talk at work: Social interaction in institutional settings Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-162.Google Scholar
Billig, M
(1987) Arguing and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carugati, F., F. Emiliani & L. Molinari
(1990) Being a mother is not enough: Theories and images in the social representations of childhood. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale 3.3: 289-306.Google Scholar
Grize, J.-B
(1989) The objects of discourse: Connexity and opposition. In M.-E. Conte, S. Petöfi & E. Sözer (eds.), Text and Discourse Connectedness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 137-162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Logique naturelle et communications. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossen, M
(1996) Counselling and gatekeeping: Definitions of the problem and situation in a first therapeutic interview. Text 16.2: 161-198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grossen, M. & D. Apothéloz
(1996) Communicating about communication in a therapeutic intervie. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15.2: 101-132. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Linell, P. & M. Bredmar
(1996) Reconstructing topical sensitivity: Aspects of face-work in talks between midwives and expectant mothers. Research on Language and Social Interaction 29.4: 347-379. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Marková, I., C. Graumann & K. Foppa
(eds.) (1995) Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D.W
(1991a) On the interactional and institutional bases of asymmetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology 97.2: 448-495. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991b) The perspective-display series and the delivery and receipt of diagnosis news. In D. Boden & H. Zimmerman (eds.), Talk and social structures. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 164-192.Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W
(1989) Notes on the reception of diagnostic news regarding mental disabilities. In T. Anderson, A.J. Meehan & A. Rawls (eds.), New directions in sociology. New York: Irvington, pp. 54-67.Google Scholar
Mercer, N
(1995) The guided construction of knowledge. Talk amongst teachers and learners. London: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Mondada, L
(1994) Verbalisation de l’espace et fabrication du savoir: Approche linguistique de la construction des objets de discours. Doctoral dissertation. Lausanne (Switzerland): University of Lausanne.
Mugny, G. & F. Carugati
(1985) L’intelligence au pluriel. Cousset (CH): Delval.Google Scholar
Peyrot, M
(1987) Circumspection in psychotherapy: Structures and strategies of client-counselor interaction. Semiotica 65: 249-268. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rommetveit, R
(1976) On the architecture of intersubjectivity. In L.H. Strickland, K.J. Gergen , & F.J. Aboud (eds.), Social psychology in transition. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 163-175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, E
(1944) Grading: A study in semantics. Philosophy of Science 2: 122-149. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar