An alternative model and ideology of communication for an alternative to politeness theory

Robert B. Arundale

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Harnish, R. M.
(1980) Overcoming the inadequacies in the ‘message model’ of linguistic communication. Communication & Cognition 13: 317–336.Google Scholar
Allen, Greg, Buxton, Richard B., Wong, Eric C., Courchesne, Eric
(1997) Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement. Science 275: 1940–1943. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis
(1971) Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R.
(1985) Cognitive psychology and its implications, 2nd ed. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M.
(1957) Intention. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arndt, Horst, Janney, Richard W.
(1987) Intergrammar: Toward a integrative model of verbal, prosodic, and kinesic choices in speech. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert B.
(1991) Studies in the way of words: Grice’s new directions in conceptualizing meaning in conversational interaction. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
(1993) Culture specific assumptions and the concept of face: A proposal toward a cultural universal for studying face management in using language. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Kobe, Japan.
(1997) Re-analyzing Grice’s maxims and cooperative principle from a conversational perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, PQ, Canada.
(1998) An outline of Face Constituting Theory: An alternative to politeness theory grounded in an alternative ideology of communication. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Pragmatics Association, Reims, France.
Bavelas, Janet Beavin
(1991) Some problems with linking goals to discourse. In K. Tracy (ed.), Understanding face-to-face interaction: Issues linking goals and discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 119–130.Google Scholar
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., Radley, A.
(1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack
(1986) Discourse and behavior. New York: Plenum. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope
(1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intention: The case of Tzeltal irony. In E. N. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 153–174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, Levinson, Stephen C.
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Page numbers in the 1987 edition can be obtained by subtracting five from page numbers 60–289 of the 1978 edition.) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cartier, Francis A.
(1963) Three misconceptions of communication. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 20: 135–145.Google Scholar
Chen, Victoria
(1990/1991) Mien tze at the Chinese dinner table: A study of the interactional accomplishment of face. Research on Language and Social Interaction 24: 109–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
(1996) Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., Clark, Eve V.
(1977) Psychology & language. New York: Harcourt Brace Javonovich.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., Thompson, Sandra A.
(1996) Practices in the construction of turns: The “TCU” revisited. Pragmatics 6: 427–454.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
(1990) Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics: 14, 219–236. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Good, David A.
(1989) The viability of conversational grammars. In M. M. Taylor, F. Neel & D. G. Bouwhuis (eds.), The structure of multimodal dialogue. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 135–144.Google Scholar
(1990) Repair and cooperation in conversation. In P. Luff, N. Gilbert, & D. Frolich (eds.), Computers and communication. London: Academic Press, 133–149.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
(1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
(1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessment. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics 1: 1–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Roy
(1996) The language connection: Philosophy and linguistics. Bristol, UK: Thoemmes Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodolgy. Cambridge: UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko
(1989) Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistics politeness. Multilingua 8: 233–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Sally, Ochs, Elinor
(1995) Co-construction: An introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 28: 171–183. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jary, Mark
(1998) Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kincaid, D. Lawrence
(1987) The convergence theory of communication, self organization, and cultural evolution. In D. L. Kincaid (ed.), Communication theory: Eastern and western perspectives. New York: Academic Press, 209–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus
(1970) On generating data in communication research. Journal of Communication 20: 241–269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1975) Some principles of information storage and retrieval in society. General Systems 20: 15–35.Google Scholar
(1984) An epistemological foundation for communication. Journal of Communication 34(3): 21–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) On the ethics of constructing communication. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B. J. O’Keefe, & E. Wartella (eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm issues. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 66–96.Google Scholar
(1993) Major metaphors of communication and some constructivist reflections on their use. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 2: 3–25.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
(1994) A recursive theory of communication. In D. Crowley & D. Mitchell (eds.), Communication theory today. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 78–104.Google Scholar
(1997) Review of J.R. Searle, The construction of social reality. Communication Theory 7: 81–84.Google Scholar
Lannamann, John W.
(1994) The problem with disempowering ideology. In S. A. Deetz (eds.), o mmunication yearbook 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 136–147.Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H.
(1996) Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 303–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 221–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
forthcoming) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crossref
Linell, Per
(1982) The written language bias in linguistics. Linkoping, Sweden: Dept. of Communication Studies, University of Linkoping.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Neisser, Ulric
(1976) Cognition and reality: Principles and limitations of cognitive psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1993) Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. search on Language and Social Interaction 26: 287–306. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Pearce, W. Barnett, Cronen, Vernon E.
(1980) Communication, action and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J.
(1979) The conduit metaphor-A case study in frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 284–324.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1992) Lectures on conversation: Volume II. Edited by Gail Jefferson, with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A, Jefferson, Gail
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of the turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
(1981) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 71–93.Google Scholar
(1984a) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 266–298.Google Scholar
(1984b) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J. Max Atkinson & John C. Heritage, eds., Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 28–52.Google Scholar
(1987) Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 101–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1988a) Discourse as an interactional achievement II: An exercise in conversation analysis. In D. Tannen (ed.), Linguistics in context. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 135–158.Google Scholar
(1988b) Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 97: 1295–1345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1994) Ideology: Strategies of reason and function of control in accounts of the non-western other. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 645–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stewart, John R.
(1995) Language as articulate contact: Toward a post-semiotic philosophy of communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Suchman, Lucy A.
(1987) Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Volosinov, V. N.
(1973) Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Ide, Sachiko., Ehlich, Konrad
(eds.) (1992) Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory, and practice. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet H., Jackson, Don
(1967) Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Werner, Carol M., Baxter, Leslie A.
(1994) Temporal qualities of relationships: Organismic, transactional, and dialectical views. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 323–379.Google Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P., Wiemann, John M., Zimmerman, Don H.
(1984) Models of turn taking in conversational interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 3: 159–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar