Politeness and political correctness: Ideological implications

Peter Klotz

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Berman, Paul
(1992): Debating pc: the controversy over pc on college campuses. New York: Laurel.Google Scholar
Bonder, Michael
(1995): Die Nabelschau der Selbstgefälligen. Frankfurt/Main: Eichborn.Google Scholar
Brown, P., S.C. Levinson
(1987): Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
(1992): On the historicity of politeness. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 71 – 108.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce & William Nolen
(1981): “The association defence with linguistic form.International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27, 93–109.
Janney, Richard W. and Arndt, Horst
(1992): Intracultural tact versus intercultural tact. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p 21–42Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
(1975): Language and Woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
(1983): Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
(1992): Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behavior: Reconsidering claims for universality. In: Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich (ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, p. 21–42.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide, Konrad Ehrlich
(ed.) (1992): Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar