Causality is one of the most intriguing concepts which a human being acquires in the earliest stages of life. The sunlight can change the color of a toy. Adults can make objects disappear and reappear. A baby itself can cause events to happen. As these examples show, causality involves at least two states of affairs and an observer. If the observer establishes a link between the two states of affairs, seeing the former as unmistakenly leading to the occurrence of the latter, the observer sees a causal relation. In that relation the former state of affairs is identified as the cause, and the latter as the consequence (other terms are effect and result). The establishment of a causal relation is therefore a cognitive operation, in which the role of the observer is quintessential. Unsurprisingly, causality is primarily a philosophical notion and has been treated by philosophers – starting with Aristotle – in different ways. A survey of their ideas has most recently been summarized from a linguistic point of view by Breul (1997).
References
Abraham, E.
1991Why ‘because’? The management given/new information as a constraint on the selection of causal alternatives. Text 11(3): 323–339.
Abraham, W.
1997Kausativierung und Dekausativierung: Zu Fragen der verbparadigmatischen Markierung in der Germania. In T. Birkmannet al. (eds.) Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik: 13–28. Niemeyer.
Aleasa, N.
1990English causative verbs ending in -en, -fy, and -ize. DA 50(11): 3568A.
Allan, K.
1986Linguistic meaning, volumes one and two. Routledge.
Altenberg, B.
1984Causal linking in spoken and written English. Studia Linguistica 38: 20–69.
Altenberg, B.
1987Causal ordering strategies in English conversation. J. Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts 50–64. Frances Pinter.
Anscombre, J.C.
1984La représentation de la notion de cause dans la langue. Cahiers de grammaire de Toulouse-Le Mirail 8: 1–53.
Antos, G.
1985Mit ‘weil’ Begründen lernen. Zur Ontogenese argumentativer Strukturen im natürlichen L2-Erwerb. In S. Kutsch & I. Desgranges (eds.) Zweitsprache Deutsch-ungesteuerten Erwerb. Interaktionsorientierte Analysen des Projekts Gastarbeiterkommunikation: 273–320. Niemeyer.
Arndt, E.
1959Das Aufkommen des begründenden ‘weil’. Herman Paul’s und Wilhelm Braune’s Beiträge zur Geschichte des Deutschen 81: 388–415.
Arndt, E.
1960Begründendes DA neben WEIL im Neuhochdeutschen. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur: 242–260.
Austin, J.L.
1962How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bach, E. & R.T. Harms
(eds.)1968 (eds.) Universals in linguistic theory. Holt, Rinehart & Winston. BoP
Baker, P.
1991Causes and effects. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 6(2): 267–278.
Bebout, L.
1977A possible derivation of causal sentences. Glossa 11(2): 223–8.
Bebout, L.J. & S.J. Segalowitz & G.J. White
1980Children’s comprehension of causal constructions with “because” and “so”. Child Development 51(2): 565–568.
Behre, F.
1961On the principle of connecting elements of speech in contemporary English. In G.A. Bonnard (ed.) English Studies Today: 303–316. Francke Verlag.
Bellert, I.
1977Über eine Bedingung für die Kohärenz von Texten. In W. Kallmeyeret al. (eds.) Lektürekolleg zur Textlinguistik. Band I: Einführung: 213–245. Athenäum Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Bendix, E.H.
1984The Metaterm ‘cause’. In L.J. Raphaelet al. (eds.) Language and cognition: 11–27. Plenum Press.
Benham, A.R.
1908The clause of result in Old English prose. Anglia 31: 197–255.
Bergner, H.
1975Überlegungen zur Kausalbestimmung in der deutschen Sprache. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 12(1): 50–57.
1982Konnektive in Sätzen und Texten. Eine sprachübergreifende pragmatisch-semantische Analyse. H. Buske.
Bickerton, D.
1973The nature of a Creole continuum. Language 49(3): 640–669.
Bieber, K.
1988Theoretische Überlegungen zur Klassifikation von Konnektoren im Französchen. Peter Lang.
Blakemore, D.L.
1987Semantic constraints on relevance. Basil Blackwell.
Blakemore, D.L.
1988‘So’ as a constraint on relevance. In R.M. Kempson (ed.) Mental representations. The interface between language and reality: 183–195. Cambridge University Press.
Bloom, L., M. Lahey, L. Hood, K. Lifter & K. Fiess
1980Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language 7(2): 235–261.
Bolinger, D.
1980Language. The loaded weapon. The use and abuse of language today. Longman. MetBib
Bolkestein, A.
1987Causally related predications and the choice between parataxis and hypotaxis in Latin. Paper presented at the International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Cambridge.
Bordelois, I.
1988Causatives: From lexicon to syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(1): 57–93.
Borer, H.
1991The causative-inchoative alternation: A case study in parallel morphology. The Linguistic Review 8(2–4): 119–58.
Bourquin, G.
1990Le statut linguistique de la cause. Recherches Anglaises et Nord-Americaines 23: 13–32.
Breul, C.
1997Grammatik und Bedeutung der kausalen Satzverbande: because, as, since und for im schriftsprachlichen Englisch. Niemeyer.
Bublitz, W. & M. Von Roncador
1975Über die deutsche Partikel ja. In I. Bátoriet al. (eds.), Syntaktische und semantische Studien zur Koordination: 137–190. Gunter Narr Verlag. BoP
Bunge, M.
1959Causality. The place of the causal principle in modern science. Harvard University Press.
Burton-Roberts, N.
1986Analysing sentences. Longman.
Chomsky, N.
1972Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In Studies on semantics in generative grammar: 62–119. Mouton.
Close, R.A.
1975A reference grammar for students of English. Longman.
1979Causality as probability. Le Langage et l’Homme 39: 35–43.
Comrie, B. & M. Polinsky
(eds.)1993Causatives and transitivity. John Benjamins. BoP
Coppieters, R.
1985Quoted speech and dialogue in contemporary English fiction: A text-relational approach. Ph.D. diss. Ghent University.
Corrigan, R.
1975A scalogram analysis of the development of the use and comprehension of “because” in children. Child Development 46(1): 195–201.
Coulmas, F.
(ed.)1997The handbook of sociolinguistics. Blackwell. BoP
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
1996Intonation and clause combining in discourse: The case of because. Pragmatics 6(3): 389–426. MetBib
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & B. Kortmann
(eds.)2000Cause – Condition – Concession – Contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter.
Cresswell, M.J.
1985Adverbial modification: Interval semantics and its rivals. D. Reidel.
Croft, W.
2000Explaining langugae change. An evolutionary approach. Longman.
Crystal, D.
1985A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Basil Blackwell.
Crystal, D.
1995The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Dacheux, E.
1994Les stratégies de communication persuasive dans l’Union européenne. L’Harmattan.
Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser
2000Constructions with if, since and because. Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.): 111–142.
Davidse, K.
1992Transitivity/Ergativity: The Janus-headed grammar of actions and events. In M. Davies & L. Ravelli (eds.) Advances in systemic linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice: 105–135. Pinter.
Davidse, K.
1996Ditransitivity and Possession. In R. Hasanet al. (eds.): 86–144.
Davies, E.C.
1976A study of conditional, causal and interrogative constructions in English, with reference to situational factors. Ph.D. diss University of London.
Davis, S.
(ed.)1983Causal theories of mind: Action, knowledge, memory, perception and reference. de Gruyter. BoP
Davison, A.
1970Causal adverbs and performative verbs. Papers from the sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 190–201. BoP
De Beaugrande, R. & W. Dressler
1981Introduction to text linguistics. Longman.
De Bleecker, D.
1977Over lexicale en perifrastische causatieven. Katholieke University Leuven.
De Boel, G.
1987De “Spray paint Cases” in diachronsich perspectief. Handelingen van de Zuidnederlandse Maatschappij 41: 5–23.
Degand, L.
1996Causation in Dutch and French: Interpersonal aspects. In R. Hasanet al. (eds.): 207–236.
Degand, L.
2000Causal connectives or causal prepositions? Discursive constraints. Journal of Pragmatics 32(6): 687–707. BoP
Delbey, A.
1987L’Expression de la cause en ancien français. Étude sémantico-syntaxique. Information Grammaticale. Présentation de thèses 32: 34–5.
Den Hertog, C.H.
19734
) Nederlandse Spraakkunst I & III. W. Versluys.
De Schutter, G. & P. Van Hauwermeiren
1983De structuur van het Nederlands. Taalbeschouwelijke grammatica. De sikkel.
1992Verbes causants et verbes causatifs dans la formation des verbes pronominaux français: La nouvelle valence ou se mourir d’ennui. Journal of French Language Studies 2(1): 33–60.
Fillmore, C.J.
1968The case for case. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (eds.): 1–88.
Fillmore, C.J.
1971Types of lexical information. In D.D. Steinberg & L.A. Jakobovits (eds.) Semantics: 370–392. Cambridge University Press.
Fodor, J.A.
19762The language of thought. The Harvester Press.
Frey, J.S.
1981Perceptions of cause. DAI 41(12): 5079A–5080A.
Fridh, A.
1977L’emploi causal de la conjonction ut en latin tardif. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Fritsche, J.
(ed.)1982Konnektivausdrücke, Konnektiveinheiten, Grundelemente der semantischen Struktur von Texten I. Helmut Buske Verlag.
Geis, J.E.
1973Subject complementation with causative verbs. In B.B. Kachruet al. (eds.) Issues in linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane: 210–230. University of Illinois Press.
Givón, T.
1975Cause and control: On the semantics of interpersonal manipulation. In J.P. Kimball (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, 4: 59–89. Academic Press. BoP
Godijns, R. & D. Vervenne
2001URUK – een methode voor geïntegreerd kennisbeheer gebaseerd op een meertalige kennispatroon-editor voor automatische documentontsluiting. Hogeschool Gent.
Gohl, C.
2000Causal relations in spoken discourse: Asyndetic constructions as a means for giving reasons. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.): 83–110.
Goodall, G.
1987Parallel structures in syntax. Coordination, causatives, and restructuring. Cambridge University Press.
Grabarek, J.
1991Die Ebenen und Mittel des sprachlichen Ausdrucks der Grund-Folge-Beziehung und die Grundlagen des Erkennens dieser Relation. In E. Feldbusch (eds.) Neue Fragen der Linguistik. Akten des 25. Linguistischen Kolloquiums: 357–362. Niemeyer.
Grant-Griffin, L.R.
1986The role of Sea Island Creole in the use and understanding of causal and temporal connectives in oral and written discourse. DAI 47(2): 482A.
Grimes, J.E.
1975The thread of discourse. Mouton.
Grober, E.H. & W. Beardsley & J. Yates
1975Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents. Cognition 3: 227–243. BoP
Guasti, M.T.
1991Incorporation, excorporation and lexical properties of causative heads. The Linguistic Review 8: 209–232.
Haegeman, L.
1985The get-passive and Burzio’s generalization. Lingua 66(1): 53–77.
Halliday, M.A.K.
1985An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
1980Le verbe faire et le cycle transformationnel. Le Langage et l’Homme 43: 45–57. BoP
Hartung, W.
(19715) Die zusammengestzten Sätze. Akademie-Verlag.
Harweg, R.
1972aDie kausalen Konjunktionen da und weil. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 86(1): 137–54. BoP
Harweg, R.
1972bWeilhaltige Begründungen in Textanfangssätzen. Ein Beitrag zur nichtsubstitutionellen Textologie. Orbis 21(1): 5–21.
Hasan, R., C. Cloran & D. Butt
(eds.)1996Functional descriptions. Theory in practice. John Benjamins.
Haudry, J.
1978L’emploi des cas en védique. Introduction à l’étude des cas en indo-européen. Reproduction des Thèses.
Heinämäki, O.
1975Because and since. Linguistica Silesiana 1: 135–143. BoP
Henschelmann, K.
1977Kausalität im Satz und im Text. Semantisch-vergleichende Studien zum Französischen und Deutschen. Carl Winter.
Hermodsson, L.
1978Semantische Strukturen der Satzgefüge im kausalen und konditionalen Bereich. Almquist & Wiksell.
Hoeken, H.
1995The design of persuasive texts: Effects of content, structure, and style on attitude formation. Ph.D. diss. Katholieke University Brabant.
Holmes, J.
1996An introduction to sociolinguistics. Longman. BoP
Homzie, M.J. & C.B. Gravitt
1977Children’s reproductions: effects of event order and implied vs. directly stated causation. Journal of Child Language 4(2): 237–246.
Hood, L. & L. Bloom
1979What, when and how about why: A longitudinal study of early expressions of causality. University of Chicago Press.
Hosselbarth, L.
1988Das unilaterale Vergleichsverfahren in Theorie und Praxis: Dargestellt am Beispiel kausaler Konnektive. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 41(2): 230–236.
Hosselbarth, L.
1990Äquivalenzbedingte Anforderungen an die Konfrontation kausaler Konnektive. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 43(5): 710–18.
Huang, S.-F.
1975A study of adverbs. Mouton.
Huddleston, R.
1971The sentence in written English: A syntactic study based on an analysis of scientific texts. Cambridge University Press.
Hudson, R.A.
1971English complex sentences. An introduction to systemic grammar. North-Holland.
Hudson, R.A.
1996Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Huijsinga, A.
1953Dan ook – immers. Nieuwe Taalgids 46: 147–53.
Hüllen, W.
1982Verbs of causativity in the English interlanguage of German learners. In W.F.W. Lohnes & E.A. Hopkins (eds.) The contrastive grammar of English and German: 170–179. Karoma Publishers.
Hutchins, E.
1980Culture and inference. A Trobriand case study. Harvard University Press.
Itkonen, E.
1984Causality in linguistic theory. A critical investigation into the philosophical and methodological foundations of ‘non-autonomous’ linguistics. Croom Helm. BoP
Iwata, S.
1995The distinctive character of psych-verbs as causatives. Linguistic Analysis 25(1–2): 95–120.
Jackendoff, R.
1972Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. M. I. T. Press. BoP
Jackendoff, R.
1983Semantics and cognition. M. I. T. Press.
Jespersen, O.
1933Essentials of English grammar. Allen & Unwin.
Jin, Y.
1993Causal relations expressed by some English subject clauses. Waiguoyu 83(1): 53–54.
Johnson, H.L. & R.S. Chapman
1980Children’s judgement and recall of causal connectives: A developmental study of “because,” “so,” and “and”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 9(3): 243–260.
1972Clauses of saying and the interpretation of because. Language 48(3): 626–32.
Kahane, H.
19885Logic and contemporary rhetoric. The use of reason in everyday life. Wadsworth.
Kastovsky, P.
1973Causatives. Foundations of Language 10: 255–315.
Katz, E.W. & S.B. Brent
1968Understanding connectives. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 7: 501–9.
Katz, J. & P. Postal
1964An integrated theory of linguistic description. M. I. T. Press. BoP
Keller, R.
1995The epistemic weil. In D. Stein & S. Wright (eds.) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspective: 16–30. Cambridge University Press.
King, R.T.
1988Spatial metaphor in German causative constructions. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.): 555–585.
Kjellmer, G.
1992Old as he was: A note on concessiveness and causality. English Studies 73(4): 337–50.
Klein, J.
1987Die konklusiven Sprechhandlungen. Studien zur Pragmatiik, Semantik, Syntax und Lexik von BEGRÜNDEN, ERKLÄREN-WARUM, FOLGERN und RECHTFERTIGEN. Niemeyer. BoP
Krivonosov, A.
1991Zum logischen Wesen der kausalen Konjunktionen. In E. Feldbusch, R. Pogarell & C. Weiss (eds.) Neue Fragen der Linguistik: 105–108. Niemeyer.
Krogsrud, H.B.
1980Factors motivating the position of finite adverbial clauses introduced by as, because, since. MA diss. University of Oslo.
Kroon, C.
1989Kleine oorzaken, grote gevolgen. Het gebruik van nam, enim, igitur en ergo bij Plautus. Paper read at Latinistendag Leiden, 13 januari 1989.
Kuhn, D. & H. Phelps
1976The development of children’s comprehension of causal direction. Child Development 47(1): 248–251.
Küper, C.
1984Zum sprechaktbezogenen Gebrauch der Kausalverknüpfer denn und weil. Linguistische Berichte 92: 15–30.
Kyratzis, A., J. Guo & S. Ervin-Tripp
1990Pragmatic conventions influencing children’s use of causal constructions in natural discourse. In K. Hallet al. (eds.) Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 205–214. Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Lafrance, M.
1992When agents disappear: How gender affects the implicit causality of interpersonal verbs. In K. Hallet al. (eds.) Locating power. Proceedings of the second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Volume 2: 338–343. Berkeley Women and Language Group.
Lakoff, G.
1970Irregularity in syntax. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Lascarides, A.
1992Knowledge, causality, and temporal representation. Linguistics 30(5): 941–73.
Laurendeau, M. & A. Pinard
1962La pensée causale. Presses Université de France.
Le Groupe Ll-L
1975Car, parce que, puisque. Revue Romane 10(2): 248–280.
Lefebvre, C. & E. Ritter
1991A note on three types of causal clauses in Haitian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 6(2): 279–83.
Levin, B. & M. Rappaport Hovav
1994A preliminary analysis of causative verbs in English. Lingua 92: 35–77.
Liggins, E.M.
1955The expression of causal relationship in Old English prose. Ph.D. diss. University of London.
Longacre, R.E.
1972Hierarchy and universality of discourse constituents in New Guinea languages. Georgetown University Press.
Lorian, A.
1970Car redivivus. Mélanges de linguistique et de philologie romanes dédiés à la mémoire de P.Fouché: 201–212. Éditions Klincksieck.
Lütjen, H.P.
1981As, because, for and since als Kausalkonjunktionen. Eine Fallstudie zur idiolektalen Variation. L.A.U. T. Series A: 81.
2000Domains of use or subjectivity? The distribution of three Dutch causal connectives explained. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.): 57–82.
Maier, N.
1997Causatives in Brazilian Portuguese. Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 33: 83–96.
Martineau, F.
1989Les clitiques en et y dans les causatives en faire. Lingvisticae Investigationes 13(2): 333–350. BoP
Mccawley, J.D.
1968The role of semantics in a grammar. In E. Bach & R.T. Harms (eds.): 124–169.
Mccawley, J.D.
1976Remarks on what can cause what. In M. Shibatani (ed.): 117–130.
Mccawley, N.A.
1976On experiencer causatives. In M. Shibatani (ed.): 181–203.
Mckeown, K.R.
1985Text generation: Using discourse strategies and focus constraints to generate natural language text. Cambridge University Press.
Merchant, R.H.
1987Computer synthesis of English causative verbs. DAI 48(6): 1448A.
Meyer, P.G.
1975Satzverknüpfungsrelationen. Ein Interpretationsmodell für situationsunabhängige Texte. G. Narr Verlag.
Meyer, P.G.
2000The relevance of causality. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.): 9–34.
Moeschler, J.
1986Connecteurs pragmatiques, lois de discours et stratégies interprétatives: parce que et la justification énonciative. Cahiers de linguistique française 7: 149–167.
Moeschler, J.
1987Trois emplois de parce que en conversation. Cahiers de linguistique française 8: 97–110.
Moeschler, J.
1998Ordre temporel, causalité et relations de discours: Une approche pragmatique. In S. Vogeleeret al. (eds.) Temps et discours: 45–64. Peeters.
Moore, M.
1994Second language acquisition of lexically constrained transitivity alternations: Acquisition of the causative alternation by second language learners of English. DAI 54(12): 4425A. BoP
Morris, L.
1997Time and cause in the English connector as. In A.K. Melby (ed.) The twenty-third LACUS Forum 1996: 417–428. Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States. BoP
Nedjalkov, V.P.
1976Kausativkonstruktionen. Gunter Narr Verlag.
Newsome, V.L.
1959Because, since, as. College English 20(6): 298–303.
Ng, S.K. & J.J. Bradac
1993Power in language. Verbal communication and social influence. Sage. BoP
Nieuwenhuijsen, P.
1973Oorzaak en gevolg. Spektator 2: 447–469.
Noach, B.M.
1952Anticiperende gevolgtrekkingen. De Nieuwe Taalgids 45: 342–343.
Noordman, L. & F. De Blijzer
2000On the processing of causal relations. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (eds.): 35–56.
Nummenmaa, L.
1973The uses of so, al so and as in early Middle English. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 39.
Nuyts, J. & J. Verschueren
1987A comprehensive bibliography of pragmatics, I. John Benjamins. BoP
O’barr, W.M.
1982Linguistic evidence: language, power and strategy in the courtroom. Academic Press.
O’brien, J.E.
1994Metaphorical knowledge in understanding caused motion expressions. DAI 54(10): 5418B.
Ottosson, U.G.
1997Kausalitet och semantik: ett bidrag till belysningen av forhallandet mellan lingvistisk sprakteori och hermeneutisk fenomenologi. DAIC 58(3): 2926.
Park, K.
1986The lexical representations of Korean causatives and passives. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Partee, B.H.
1979Subject and object in modern English. Garland Publishing.
Pasch, R.
1983Untersuchungen zu den Gebrauchsbedingungen der deutschen Kausalkonjunktionen da, denn und weil. Linguistische Studien A 104: 41–243. BoP
Pateman, T.
1985Linguistics as a branch of critical theory. UEA Papers in Linguistics 14/15: 1–29. BoP
Pearce, E.
1990Parameters in old French syntax: Infinitival complements. Kluwer Academic.
Pears, I.
1997An instance of the fingerpost. Vintage.
Perloff, R.M.
1993The dynamics of persuasion. Erlbaum.
Persson, I.
1992Das kausative Funktionsverbgefuge (FVG) und dessen Darstellung in der Grammatik und im Worterbuch. Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation 20(2): 153–71.
Peterson, C. & A. Mccabe
1985Understanding “because”: How important is the task?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14(2): 199–218. BoP
Piaget, J.
1927La causalité physique chez l’enfant. Félix Alcan.
Piaget, J.
1930Le langage et la pensée chez l’enfant. Delachaux et Niestlé.
Plantin, C.
1990La cause du brevet. Langue Française 86: 11–21.
Pollmann, T.
1973Het zogenaamde presuppositionele ‘het’ en causaliteit. Nieuwe Taalgids 66: 265–268.
Posch, G.
1981Kausalität. Neue Texte. Reclam.
Poutsma, H.
19292A grammar of late modern English. Part I. The sentence. Second half. The composite sentence. P. Noordhoff.
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
1972A grammar of contemporary English. Longman.
Quirk, R.S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman. BoP
Randriamasimana, C.
1986The causatives of Malagasy. University of Hawaii Press.
Reed, L.
1991The thematic and syntactic structure of French causatives. Probus 3(3): 317–60.
Reed, L.
1992aOn clitic case alternations in French causatives. In P. Hirschbuhler & K. Koerner (eds.): Romance languages and modern linguistic theory: 205–223. John Benjamins.
Reed, L.
1992bRemarks on word order in causative constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 23(1): 164–72.
Rijksbaron, A.
1976Temporal and causal conjunctions in ancient Greek. With special reference to the use of epei (romanized form) and hos (romanized form) in Herodotus. Adolf M. Hakkert.
Ritter, E. & S.T. Rosen
1997The function of have. Lingua: International Review of General Linguistics 101(3–4): 295–321.
Ross, J.R.
1970On declarative sentences. In R. Jacobs & P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar: 222–272. Ginn & Company.
Rudolph, E.
1979Beschreibungsprobleme syntaktischer und semantischer Kausalstrukturen. In R. Kloepfer (ed.) Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania. Band II: 85–100. München.
Rudolph, E.
1980Bemerkungen zur konnektiven Partikel denn. In E. Weigand & G. Tschauder (ed.). Perspektive: textintern: 249–261. Niemeyer.
Rudolph, E.
1982Zur Problematik der Konnektive des kausalen Bereichs. In J. Fritsche (ed.): 146–244.
(ed.)1988Topics in cognitive linguistics. John Benjamins.
Ruppli, M.
1990L’Opposition car / parce que. L’Information Grammaticale 46: 22–25.
Rutherford, W.E.
1970Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46: 97–115.
Ryle, G.
1950“If”, “so”, and “because”. In M. Black (ed.) Philosophical analysis: 323–340. Cornell University Press.
Sæbø, K.J.
1980Infinitive perfect and backward causation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 161–173.
Saksena, A.
1982aTopics in the analysis of causatives: With an account of Hindi paradigms. University of California Press.
Saksena, A.
1982bContact in causation. Language 58(4): 820–831.
Scharff-Babcock, S.
1972Paraphrastic causatives. Foundations of Language 8: 30–43.
Schibsbye, K.
19702. A modern English grammar. Oxford University Press.
Schiffrin, D.
1987Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Schleppegrell, M.J.
1990Functions of because in spoken discourse. DAI 50(11): 3574A.
Schleppegrell, M.J.
1991Paratactic because. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 323–337.
Schleppegrell, M.J.
1996aConjunction in spoken English and ESL writing. Applied Linguistics 17(3): 271–85.
Schleppegrell, M.J.
1996bStrategies for discourse cohesion: Because in ESL writing. Functions of Language 3(2): 235–54.
Schmidhauser, B.
1995Kausalität als linguistische Kategorie. Niemeyer.
Searle, J.R.
1969Speech acts. An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Shibatani, M.
1975A linguistic study of causative constructions. Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Shibatani, M.
(ed.)1976Syntax and semantics, 6. The grammar of causative constructions. Academic Press. BoP
Shyldkrot, H.B.Z.
1989Conjonctions et expression temporelle-causale en français. Folia Linguistica Historica 10(1–2): 263–80.
Shyldkrot, H.B.Z.
1994Sur le rapport temporel-causal dans les subordonnees: le cas de en attendant que – attendu que. Travaux de Linguistique 27: 113–33.
Sijbesma, R.P.E.
1992Causatives and accomplishments: The case of Chinese Ba. HIL-Dissertations 1.
Silva, M.N.
1983The development of conjunction in later childhood. Ph.D. diss. University of California.
Skorochod’ko, E.F.
1981Semantische Relationen in der Lexik und in Texten. Studienverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Smith, M.A.
1984Der kausale Vertextungstyp im Deutschen und Englischen. Ph.D. Diss. Technische Universität Berlin.
Snitzer Reilly, J.
1986The acquisition of temporals and conditionals. In E.C. Traugottet al. (eds.) On conditionals: 309–331. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
1986Relevance. Communication and cognition. Blackwell. BoP
Stassen, L.
1985Comparison and universal grammar. Blackwell.
St Germain, J.
1997Semantic communicative structure of verbal versus conjunctive causative expressions (TO KILL/TO CAUSE TO DIE versus TO DIE BECAUSE P). In L. Wanner (ed.) Recent trends in meaning-text theory: 75–92. John Benjamins.
Sullivan, L.
1972Development of causal connectives by children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 35(3): 1003–1010.
Sweet, H.
1900A new English grammar. Logical and historical, Part 1. Clarendon Press.
Sweetser, E.
1990From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Talmy, L.
1976Semantic causative types. In M. Shibatani (ed.): 43–116.
Talmy, L.
1985Force dynamics in language and thought. University of California Press. BoP
Tasmowski-De Ryck, L. & Liliane
1982L’Immixation causative. Travaux de Linguistique: Publication du Service de Linguistique Française de l’Université de l’État à Gand 9–10: 103–126.
Thiele, W.
1982Die semantisch-syntaktische Beschreibung von Ursache-Wirkung-Beziehungen in englischen Texten. Akademie-Verlag.
Thim-Mabrey, C
1982Zur Syntax der kausalen Konjunktionen weil, da und denn. Sprachwissenschaft 7(2): 197–219.
Thomson, A.J. & A.V. Martinet
19692A practical English grammar. Oxford University Press.
Tobin, Y.
1993Aspect in the English verb: Process and result in language. Longman.
Trost, K.
1982Zur Unterscheidung der finalen, der kausalen und der relationalen Verben. Sprachwissenschaft 22(1): 168–196.
Trudgill, P.
19954. Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Penguin. BoP
Tuggy, D.
1988Náhuatl causative/applicatives in cognitive grammar. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.): 587–618.
Van Dam, J.
1957The causal clause and causal prepositions in early old English prose. Wolters.
Van Der Leek, F.
1972–3Opmerkingen over ‘cause’. Spektator 2: 312–319.
Van Dijk, T.A.
1977aText and context. Semantics and pragmatics of discourse. Longman.
Van Dijk, T.A.
1977bConnectives in text grammar and text logic. In T.A. Van Dijk & J.S. Petöfi (eds.) Grammars and descriptions: 11–63. Walter de Gruyter.
Van Dort-Slijper, M.K.
1972Wat Tijs teweegbracht. Enkele opmerkingen over cause. Spektator 2: 46–53.
Vandepitte, S.
1991Every why has a wherefore. A generative-pragmatic study of the expression and interpretation of causality in modern spoken British English, with particular reference to conjuncts and conjunctions. Ph.D. diss. Ghent University.
Vandepitte, S.
1993A pragmatic study of the expression and interpretation of causality: Conjuncts and conjunctions in modern spoken British English. Academy of Sciences. BoP
Vandepitte, S.
1998Causaliteit en haar uitdrukkingsvormen in het Engels – een classificatie. Handelingen L, Koninklijke Zuid-Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Taal- en Letterkunde en Geschiedenis: 141–157.
1989Persuasive communication of technological risks. A test of the elaboration likelihood model. Ph.D. diss. Leiden.
Verspoor, M.H.
1991Semantic properties of English matrix verbs pertinent to sentential complement selection. In F. Ingemann (ed.) 1990 Mid-America Linguistics Conference papers: 396–408. Dept. of Linguistics, University of Kansas.
Von Wright, G.H.
1974Erklären und Verstehen. Fischer Athenäum Taschenbuch.
Vygotsky, L.S.
1962Thought and language. M. I. T. Press.
Wali, K.
1981Cause, causer, and causee: a semantic perspective. Journal of Linguistics 17: 289–308.
Wegener, H.
1993Weil – das hat schon seinen Grund: Zur Verbstellung in Kausalsätzen mit weil im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache 21(4): 289–305.
Werlich, E.
1983A text grammar of English. Quelle & Meyer.
Whalen, D.J.
1996I see what you mean. Persuasive business communication. Sage.
Willems, K.
1994Weil es hat mit Bedeutung nicht viel zu tun…: Zum Sprachwandel einer Konjunktion. Deutsche Sprache: Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation 22(3): 261–79.
Winter, E.O.
1982Towards a contextual grammar of English. Allen & Unwin.
Wood, F.T.
1956The expression of cause and reason in modern English. Moderna språk 50: 431–8.