Cognitive science

Seana Coulson & Teenie Matlock
Table of contents

Cognitive science, the interdisciplinary study of cognitive phenomena, has its origins in philosophy and can be viewed as the empirical pursuit of age-old questions in the philosophy of mind. Perhaps the word that best captures the field of cognitive science is diversity. Cognitive scientists study a broad range of cognitive phenomena, including attention, perception, memory, language, learning, and reasoning. Moreover, researchers in cognitive science come from a wide range of backgrounds. The field draws from a number of disciplines including philosophy, linguistics, psychology, computer science, anthropology, sociology, and the neurosciences. The upshot of the varied nature of the enterprise is that convergent findings often arise out of a number of complementary research methods.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Albright, T.D. & H. Neville
2003 Neurosciences. In R.A. Wilson & F.C. Keil (eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (online). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ballard, D. & M. Hayhoe J. Pelz
1995 Memory representations in natural tasks. Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 66–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, E.S.M. Wilson, A.P. Saygin, F. Dick, M.I. Sereno R.T. Knight & N.F. Dronkers
2003 Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience 6 (5): 448–50.Google Scholar
Bechtel, W.
1998 Representations and cognitive explanations: Assessing the dynamicist’s challenge in cognitive science. Cognitive Science 22: 295–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bookheimer, S.
2002 Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1957 Syntactic Structures. Mouton.Google Scholar
1965 Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A.V.
1996 Ecological validity and ‘white rooms effects’. The interaction of cognitive and cultural models in the pragmatic analysis of elicited narratives from children. Pragmatics & Cognition 4: 221–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, A.
2001 Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H.
1996 Using language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H. & M.A. Krych
2004 Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 50: 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S.
2001 Semantic Leaps: Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2004 Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension. In I. Noveck & D. Sperber (eds.) Experimental Pragmatics: 187–206. Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. & C. Koch
2003 A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 6: 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
1985 Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1994 Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language [augmented paperback edition]. Cambridge University Press.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
1992 Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review 99: 572–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S.
2003 Hearing Gesture: How our Hands Help us Think. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Z.
2004 The eyes are right when the mouth is wrong. Psychological Science 15: 814–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hollan, J.D., E.L. Hutchins & D. Kirsh
2000 Distributed cognition: A new theoretical foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 7 (2): 174–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E.
1995 Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N. & W. Wojciulik
2000 Visual attention: Insights from brain imaging. Nature Reviews 1: 91–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A.
1998 Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 389–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B.D.J. Barr, J.A. Balin & J.S. Brauner
2000 Taking perspective in conversation: the role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 11: 32–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kosslyn, S.M.G. Ganis & W.L. Thompson
2003 Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 109–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kovecses, Z.
1986 Metaphors of anger, pride, and love (Pragmatics and Beyond VII:8). Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1995 Metaphor and the folk understanding of anger. In J.A. Russell & J.-M. Fernández-Dols (eds.) Everyday conceptions of emotion: An introduction to the psychology, anthropology and linguistics of emotion: 48–71 Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980 Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.M. Johnson
1998 Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Land, M.F.
1992 Predictable eye-head coordination during driving. Nature 359: 318–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1990 Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, M. N. Pearlmutter & M. Seidenberg
1994 The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J.M.
1992 How to build a baby II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review 99: 587–604. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markman, A. & E. Dietrich
2000 In defense of representation. Cognitive Psychology 40: 138–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, A.A. & L. Chao
2001 Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11: 194–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcculloch, W.S. & W. Pitts
1943 A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5: 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcneill, D.
1992 Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, A.D. & M.A. Goodale
1998 The visual brain in action. [précis of A.D. Milner & M.A. Goodale. 1995. The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.]. Psyche 4(12). Available: http://​psyche​.cs​.monash​.edu​.au​/v4​/psyche​-4–12​-milner​.html.Google Scholar
Newell, A.
1973 You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win. In W.G. Chase (ed.) Visual information processing: 283–308. St. Martin’s Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newell, A. & H. Simon
1965 An example of human chess playing in the light of chess playing programs. In N. Wiener & J.P. Schade (eds.) Progress in biocybernetics vol 2: 19–75. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Norman, D.
2004 Emotional Design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Noveck, I.A. & D. Sperber
2004 Experimental pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G.
1978 The Pragmatics of Reference. Indiana University Linguistics Club.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E. & B. Schieffelin
1976 Topic as discourse notion. In C. Li (ed.) Subject and topic: 337–384. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Picard, R.W.
2000 Toward Agents that Recognize Emotion. Vivek 13: 3–13.Google Scholar
Pickering, M.J. & S. Garrod
2004 Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169–226.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, M.I. & M.E. Raichle
1994 Images of Mind. Scientific American Books.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F.
2003 The Neuroscience of Language: On Brain Circuits of Words and Serial Order. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quinn, N. & D. Holland
1987 Culture and cognition. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (eds.) Cultural models in language and thought: 3–42. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
1996 Motion metaphorized: The case of ‘coming’ and ‘going’. In E.H. Casad (ed.) Cognitive linguistics in the Redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics: 423–58. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 Time is space. In B. Smieja & M. Tasch (eds.) Human Contact through Language and Linguistics: 147–66. P. Lang.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Rayner, K. & S.P. Liversedge
2004 Visual and linguistic processing in reading. In F. Ferreira & J. Henderson (eds.) Eye Movements and Multimodal Processing. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, M.
1979 The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought: 284–324. Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Reitman, W.
1970 What does it take to remember? In D.A. Norman (ed.). Models of human memory Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D.C. & M.J. Spivey
2004 Eye-Tracking: Research areas and applications. In G. Wnek & G. Bowlin (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering. Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
Shankle, W.R.
1998 Developmental patterns in the cytoarchitecture of the human cerebral cortex from birth to six years examined by correspondence analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 4023–4038. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C.E.
1949 A mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & D. Wilson
2002 Pragmatics, Modularity, and Mind-Reading. Mind & Language 17: 3–23. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Squire, L.R. & S. Zola-Morgan
1988 Memory: Brain Systems and Behavior. Trends in Neuroscience 11: 170–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, E.
1990 From etymology to pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L.
2000 Toward a cognitive semantics. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.
2004 In F. Ferreira & J. Henderson (eds.). Eye Movements and Multimodal Processing. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M.K., M.J. Spivey-Knowlton, K.M. Eberhard & J.E. Sedivy
1995 Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268: 1632–1634. DOI logoGoogle Scholar