Metonymy

Klaus-Uwe Panther & Günter Radden
Table of contents

Metonymy (Greek µετονυµία ‘change of name’) is one of the major figures of speech recognized in classical rhetoric. One of the earliest definitions of metonymy is attributed to the treatise Rhetorica ad Herennium (see Koch 1999: 140). The anonymous author characterizes metonymy as “a trope that takes its expression from near and close things [‘ab rebus propinquis et finitimis’] by which we can comprehend a word that is not denominated by its proper word” (translation by Koch 1999: 141). This ancient characterization already points to the notions of contiguity and substitution, which have ever since been criterial in distinguishing metonymy from metaphor.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Barcelona, A.
2000 On the plausibility of claiming metonymic motivation for conceptual metaphor. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 22–58. Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blank, A.
1999 Co-presence and succession. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 169–191. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M. & R. Brdar-Szab
2003 Metonymic coding of linguistic action: A cross-linguistic study. In K.-U. Panther & L.L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing: 241–266. Benjamins>. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
1993 The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 335–370. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2001 Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W. Jr.
1994 The poetics of mind: Figurative thought language, and understanding. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.W.
1999 Speaking and thinking with metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 61–76. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.
1995 Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. H
1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.J. & E.C. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Koch, P.
1999 Frame and contiguity: On the cognitive bases of metonymy and certain types of word formation. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 139–167. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1987 Women fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1999 Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Turner
1989 More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. The Chicago University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.
1993 Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 4: 1–38. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S.
2000 Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Nikiforidou, K.
1999 Nominalizations metonymy, and lexicographic practice. In L.G. Stadler & C. Eyrich (eds.) Issues in cognitive linguistics: 141–163. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBib DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
1981 Semiotic principles in semantic theory. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U.
2001 Syntactic control. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (eds.) International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences: 15397–15401. Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panther, K.-U. & L.L. Thornburg
1998 A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 755–769. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 333–357. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 The effect for cause metonymy in English grammar. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 215–231. Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar
2003a Introduction: On the nature of conceptual metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & L.L. Thornburg (eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing: 1–20. Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003b Metonymy and lexical aspect in English and French. Jezikoslovlje 4(1): 71–101. Google Scholar
Papafragou, A.
1996 Figurative language and the semantics-pragmatics distinction. Language and Literature 5(1): 179–193. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, J.
1993 Type coercion and lexical selection. In J. Pustejovsky (ed.) Semantics and the Lexicon: 73–96. Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radden, G.
2000 How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 93–108. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
2004 The folk model of language. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & A. Kwiatkowska (eds.) Imagery in language: Festschrift in honour of Professor Ronald W. Langacker: 543–565. Peter Lang. Google Scholar
Radden, G. & Z. Kövecses
1999 Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.-U. Panther & G. Radden (eds.) Metonymy in language and thought: 17–59. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ruiz De Mendoza, F.
2000 The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective: 109–132. Mouton de Gruyter.  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.
1969 Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1975 Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts: 59–82. Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Song, N.S.
1998 Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.) Relevance Theory: Applications and implications: 87–104. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Thornburg, L. & K.-U. Panther
1997 Speech act metonymies. In W.-A. Liebert, G. Redeker & L. Waugh (eds.) Discourse and perspectives in cognitive linguistics: 205–219. Benjamins. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C. & E. König
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.) Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1: 189–218. Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, S.
1962 Semantics: An introduction to the science of meaning. Blackwell. Google Scholar