Genetic translation studies

Anthony Cordingley

Table of contents

Genetic translation studies is a field of research in which the methodology of Franco-Belgian critique génétique, or genetic criticism, is used to study translators’ drafts, manuscripts, notes, corrected proofs – a translation’s avant-textes – in order to discern the processes that shaped the writing of translation. Critique génétique was first applied to translated texts in the 1990s, when researchers at the Institut des Textes et Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) in Paris published their investigations into Paul Valéry’s translation papers as Génétique & Traduction (Bourjea 1995). Scott (2006) advanced a theoretical discussion around questions which themselves gained wider recognition with the special issues of Genesis (Durand-Bogaert 2014a) and Linguistica Antverpiensia (Cordingley and Montini (2015a), in particular. At this time, reflections on the use of archival sources emerged in other quarters of translation studies (e.g., Munday 2013, 2014; Mitchell 2014). Cordingley and Montini (2015b) proposed that such research be identified as “genetic translation studies” (GTS) to distinguish it from other approaches, such as cognitive, descriptive, sociological (see Sociology of translation) or corpus-based (see Corpora) translation studies. If GTS sometimes draws on one or more of these, it is defined by the systematic study of the successive phases of a translation through the documentary evidence of a translator’s work, and its subsequent evolution. GTS analyses avant-textes to determine the different processes and writing strategies engaged by the translator/s; it gauges the factors that inhibit or facilitate translators’ autonomy and creativity, including external influences, such as authors, collaborators, publishers, revisers, readers, who may alter the translator’s text, often in a series of back-and-forth revisions during the production phase of the text. This research also maps out the text’s evolution in its post-text phase, which includes revisions and reeditions of a published translation and even its role as a source in a retranslation. It acknowledges that at each stage, the writing of translation is shaped by considerations of the translation’s function in the target culture, as well as its relationship to the source text. More recently GTS research has explored the translation archive as a site with its own political and aesthetic dynamics (see Cordingley & Hersant 2021).

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Bourjea, Serge
(ed.) 1995Génétique & traduction. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Cordingley, Anthony, and Chiara Montini
(eds) 2015aTowards a Genetics of Translation, Special issue of Linguistica Antverpiensia (New Series) 14.Google Scholar
2015b“Genetic translation studies: an emerging discipline. Linguistica Antverpiensia (New Series) 14: 1–18.Google Scholar
De Biasi, Pierre-Marc
2011Génétique des textes. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Durand-Bogaert, Fabienne
(ed.) 2014aTraduire, Special issue of Genesis, 38.Google Scholar
2014b “Les deux corps du texte.” Genesis 38: 11–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grésillon, Almuth
1994Eléments de critique génétique. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Hay, Louis
1993Les Manuscrits des ecrivains. Paris: Hachette, CNRS.Google Scholar
Miller, Jeffrey Alan
2018 “The Earliest Known Draft of the King James Bible: Samuel Ward’s Draft of 1 Esdras and Wisdom 3-4.” In Labourers in the Vineyard of the Lord: Scholarship and the Making of the King James Version of the Bible, ed. by Mordechai Feingold, 187–265. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Breon
2014 “The Lives of the Translators.” In The Man Between: Michael Henry Heim & a Life in Translation, ed. by Esther Allen, Sean Cotter, and Russell Scott Valentino, pp. 250–269. Rochester, NY: Open Letter.Google Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
2013 “The role of archival and manuscript research in the investigation of translator decision-making.” Target 25 (1): 125–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 “Using primary sources to produce a microhistory of translation and translators: theoretical and methodological concerns.” The Translator 20 (1): 64–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Clive
2006 “Translating the literary: Genetic criticism text theory and poetry.” In The Translator as Writer, ed. by Susan Bassnett, and Peter Bush, 106–117. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Further essential reading

Cordingley, Anthony, and Patrick Hersant
(eds) 2021Translation Archives, Special issue of Meta 66 (1).Google Scholar
Deppman, Jed, Daniel Ferrer, and Michael Groden
(eds) 2004Genetic criticism: Texts and avant-textes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Dirk
2014Modern Manuscripts: The extended mind and creative undoing from Darwin to Beckett and beyond. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar