Relevantsus ja tõlkimine [Relevance and translation]

Fabio Alves & José Luiz Gonçalves
Federal University of Minas Gerais | Federal University of Ouro Preto
tõlkija Kadri Koitsaar
Sisukord

Eeldame, et inimesed tajuvad millegi relevantsust intuitiivselt ja suudavad järjekindlalt eristada olulist teavet ebaolulisest või mõnel juhul olulisemat teavet vähem olulisest. Samas pole seda intuitsiooni väga lihtne esile kutsuda või põhjendusena kasutada. Asjaolu, et on olemas kindel, kuid hägusa ja muutuva tähendusega relevantsuse mõiste, on pigem takistuseks kui abiks.

Full-text access to translations is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

Kasutatud allikad

Almazán Garcia, Eva M.
2001 „Dwelling in Marble Halls: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to Intertextuality in Translation.“ Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 14: 7–19.Google Scholar
Alves, Fabio
1995 Zwischen Schweigen und Sprechen: Wie bildet sich eine transkulturelle Brücke?: eine psycholinguistisch orientierte Untersuchung von übersetzungsvorgängen zwischen portugiesischen und brasilianischen übersetzern. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.Google Scholar
Alves, Fabio & Gonçalves, José Luiz
2003 „A relevance theory approach to the investigation of inferential processes in translation.“ Triangulating translation: perspectives in process oriented research, Fabio Alves (ed.), 11–34. Benjamins Translation Library 45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2007 „Modelling translator’s competence: relevance and expertise under scrutinity.“ Translation studies: doubts and directions. Yves Gambier, Miriam Shlesinger, Radegundis Stolze (eds), 41–55. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, José Luiz
2003 O desenvolvimento da competência do tradutor: investigando o processo através de um estudo exploratório-experimental. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Belo Horizonte: Faculdade de Letras, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Grice, Paul
1975 „Logic and Conversation.“ Syntax and Semantics, P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gutt, Ernst-August
1991 Translation and relevance: cognition and context. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2000 „Issues of Translation Research in the Inferential Paradigm of Communication.“ Intercultural faultlines: research models in translation studies I. Textual and cognitive aspects, Maeve Olohan (ed.), 161–179. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
2004 „Challenges of metarepresentation to translation competence“ Translationskompetenz: Proceedings of LICTRA 2001: VII. Leipziger Internationale Konferenz zu Grundfragen der Translatologie, E. Fleischmann, P. A. Schmitt & G. Wotjak (eds), 77–89. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2005 „On the significance of the cognitive core of translation.“ The Translator 11 (1): 25–49.Google Scholar
Martínez Sierra, J. J.
2005 „Un acercamiento descriptivo y discursivo a la traducción del humor en textos audiovisuales. El caso de Los Simpson.“ Puentes 6: 53–59.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2010 Exploring translation theories. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Setton, Robin
1999 Simultaneous Interpretation. A Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre
1986 Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
1992 „A Theoretical Account of Translation – Without Translation Theory?“ Target 4 (2): 237–245.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deidre
2000 „Metarepresentation in linguistic communication.“ Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, Dan Sperber (ed.), 411–448. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2010 Relevance Theory Online Bibliography Service. http://​www​.ua​.es​/personal​/francisco​.yus​/rt​.html#Translation [Vaadatud 3. mai 2010].