Methodology in Translation Studies

Peter FlynnYves Gambier
Lessius University College | University of Turku
Table of contents

Methodology could be defined as the study of or the body of knowledge relating to method(s). Viewed in other terms, it can be considered as the hallmark or defining feature of a discipline or an approach within a discipline. In this respect any methodology is the site of constant contention, refinement and re-evaluation (Kuhn 1962). So strictly speaking, a discussion of methodology should also include the position(ing) (Marcus 1998: 98) of the scholar or school with regard to it, both inside any given approach and other approaches adjacent to it and within the discipline as a whole. This has been the case in Translation Studies, viz. the long-standing debate on the use and effectiveness of the Liberal Arts Paradigm and Empirical Science Paradigm (Gile 2005) in tackling and understanding translational and interpreting phenomena. The same holds for the various turns in Translation Studies, all of which are manifestations of its attempt to expand, define and establish itself as a specific academic discipline (Snell-Hornby 2006). Furthermore, an awareness of positioning and its ethical and political implications for researchers has given rise to studies in this area (see Committed approaches and activism; Gender and translation; Political translation; Post-colonial literatures and translation). All of these turns have brought changes in methodology with them or have rejected previous approaches and their respective methodologies. As Interpreting Studies has developed and outlined its own methodological concern, the discussion that follows will focus on translation.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.


Bourdieu, Pierre
2001Science de la science et réflexivité. Cours du Collège de France, 2000–2001. Paris: Raisons d’agir.Google Scholar
1980Le sens pratique. Paris: Les éditions de minuit.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
2001Linguistic anthropology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gile, Daniel
2005Research issues in Translation Studies. Online reference materials. European Society for Translation Studies at http://​www​.est​-translationstudies​.org​/publications​/publications​.html [Accessed 3 February 2011]
Goodwin, Charles & Alessandro Duranti
(eds) 1992Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Katan, David
2004 2nd edition. Translating cultures: an introduction for translators, interpreters and mediators. Manchester: St Jerome.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S
1962The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B
2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E
1998Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Douglas
(ed.) 1997Western translation theory. From Herodotus to Nietzsche. Manchester: St. Jerome.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995Descriptive Translation studies and Beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Etienne
1998Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge U.K/ New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar

Further reading

Brenda Nicodemus & Laurie Swabey
(eds) 2011Advances in Interpreting Research. Inquiry in action. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. . DOI logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L
2002“Interviewing, Power/Knowledge, and Social Inequality.” In Handbook of Interview Research Context & Method, F. Jaber (eds), 911–922. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gabriela Saldanha & Sharon O'Brien
2013Research methodologies in TS. 280p. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Holliday, Adrian
2007Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Jaber, F. Gubrium, J.F & Holstein, J.A
(eds) 2002Handbook of Interview Research Context and Method. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sandra Hale & Jemina Napier
2013: Research Methods in Interpreting. A practical Resource. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Singleton, Royce & Straits, Bruce C
2010Approaches to Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar