Hybridity and translation

Sherry Simon
Concordia University

Table of contents

When two different things are brought together – when plants or animals are ‘crossed’, when two identities are fused, when literary genres are mixed, when a building combines the features of different architectural styles – something new results. This new thing is a hybrid. Today the idea of hybridity has largely positive connotations as it is articulated in esthetics or in cultural theory using postcolonial models (Bhabha, Young) and cyborg theory (Haraway). Mixed identities and creative interference are positively valued for their power to innovate and surprise, to express new emotions and ideas, to reflect changing sociocultural realities. In French, a similar revaluation of the term “métissage” has been undertaken. However, the idea of hybridity carries with it a long history of negativity. Consider the words mongrel or half-breed, which share the same semantic field. During the 18th and 19th centuries hybridity was regularly associated with the abnormal, the monstrous or the grotesque, and the term was implicated in some of the more somber episodes of scientific history having to do racist ideas of ‘polygenesis’ – which postulated the existence of more than one human species. For those who defended pure forms of expression, hybridity was a form of contamination – in the same way as religious syncretism was and continues to be rejected by defenders of authoritative dogma.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Bhabha, Homi
1994The Location of Culture. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gentzler, E
2008Translation and Identity in the Americas: New Directions in Translation Theory. London/New York: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Godayol, P
(ed.) 2001Veus Xicanes. Vic: Eumo Editorial.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna
1991“A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature, 149–181. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laplantine, F. & Nouss, A
2001Métissages, de Arcimboldo à Zombi. Paris: Pauvert.Google Scholar
Leclerc, Catherine
2005“Between French and English, Between Ethnography and Assimilation: Strategies for Translating Moncton’s Acadian Vernacular.” TTR 18 (2): 161–192. Crossref logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Simon, Sherry
(ed.) 1995Culture in Transit. Montreal: Véhicule Press.  TSBGoogle Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2003“Enlarging Western Translation Theory: Integrating Non-Western Thought about Translation.” http://​eslking​.com​/library2​/collections​/language​/translation​/tymoczko​_translation​_theory​.pdf [Accessed 14 June 2011]
Wolf, M
2007“The location of the ‘translation field. Negotiating borderlines between Pierre Bourdieu and Homi Bhabha.” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, Michaela Wolf & Alexandra Fukari (eds), 109–119. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins  TSB. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Robert J.C
1995Colonial Desire. Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Further reading

Pratt, Mary Louise
1991“Arts of the Contact Zone.” Profession 91: 33–l40.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina & Adab, Beverly
2001“The Idea of the Hybrid Text in Translation: Contact as Conflict.” Across Languages and Cultures 2 (2): 277–302. Crossref logo  TSBGoogle Scholar
Simon, Sherry
1999Hybridité Culturelle. Montréal : Editions Ile de la Tortue.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michaela
2000“The ‘Third Space’ in Postcolonial Representation.” In Changing the Terms. Translating in the Postcolonial Era, Sherry Simon and Paul St-Pierre (eds), 127–145. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar