The relation of language to context in children’s speech the role of HAFTA statements in structuring 3-year-old’s discourse.

Julie Gerhardt

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Austin, J
(1961) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S
(1978/1987) Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Corsaro, W
(1985) Friendship and Peer culture in the Early Years. Norwood, N.J.: AblexGoogle Scholar
D'Andrade, R
(1987) A folk model of the mind. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, J
(1987) The Discourse basis of Ergativity. Language 63: 805-855 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, A. and Garvey, C
(1981) Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4: 149-170 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S
(1976) Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5: 25-66 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1977) Wait for me roller skate! In S. Ervin-Tripp & C. Mitchell-Kernan (eds.), Child Discourse.New York: Academic Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. and Gordon, D
(1985) The development of requests. In R.L. Schiefelbusch (ed.), Communicative competence: Assessment and intervention. San Diego, Calif.: College-HillGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S., Strage, A., Lampert, M. and Bell, N
(1987) Understanding requests. Linguistics 25: 107-143 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C
(1982) Frame Semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: HanshinGoogle Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222-253Google Scholar
Fleischman, S
(1982) The Future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Garvey, C
(1975) Requests and responses in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 2: 41-63 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) The modals of necessity and obligation in children's pretend play. Poster presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development
Gee, J
. (nee Gerhardt) (1985) An interpretive approach to the study of modality: What child language can tell the linguist. Studies in Language 9:2: 197-229 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. (nee Gerhardt) and Savasir, I
(1985) On the use of WILL & GONNA: Towards a description of activity-types for child language. Discourse Processes 8: 143-175 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, J. and Savasir, I
(1986) The use of the simple present in the speech of two three-year-olds: Normativity not subjectivity. Language in Society 15: 501-536 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, J
(1988) From discourse to semantics: The development of verb morphology and forms of self-reference in the speech of a two-year-old. Journal of Child Language 15: 337-393 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
in press) Core Uses and Extended Uses of HAFTA, NEEDTA and WANNA for children
Gibbs, R. W
(1979) Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests. Discourse Processes 2: 1-10 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givon, T
(1982) Logic vs. pragmatics, with human language as the referee: toward an empirically viable epistemology. Journal of Pragmatics 6.1: 81–133 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Syntax: A Functional-Typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1989) Mind, Code and Context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E
(1976) Replies and responses. Language in Society 5: 257-313 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1978) Response Cries. Language 54: 787-815 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1983) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania PressGoogle Scholar
Gordon, D. and Lakoff, G
(1971) Conversational Postulates. Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J
(1982) Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1989) Some further notes on contextualization. Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley
Hare, R.M
(1951) The language of morals. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Harris, Z
(1951) Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. and Atkinson, J. M
1984Introduction. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) structures of Social Action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P
(1979) Aspect and foregrounding in discourse. In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics vol, 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D
(1972) Models of the interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston  BoPGoogle Scholar
Keller-Cohen, D., Chalmer, K. and Remler, J
(1979) The Development of discourse negation in the Nonnative child. In. E. Ochs & B. Schieffelin (eds.) Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Kenny, A
(1963) Action, emotion and will. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. and Fanshell, D
(1977) Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S
(1979) Activity types and language. Linguistics 17: 356-99 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1983) Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J
(1977) Semantics. vol. 2. New York: Cambridge University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mann, W.C., and Thompson, S. A
Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9: 57-90 Crossref
McTear, M
(1985) Children's conversations. Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Meldon, A.I
(1961) Free Action. London: Routledge and Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
Minsky, M
(1975) A Framework for representing knowledge. In Patrick Winston (ed.) The Psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F
(1979) Modality and the English Modals. New York: Longmans  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1986) Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pike, K
(1964) Towards a theory of the structure of human behavior. In D. Hymes (ed.) Language, culture and society. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some feature of preferred/ dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P
(1976) Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Forthworth: The Texas Christian University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rumelhardt, D
1974Notes on a schema for stories. In Bobrow, D. & Collins, A. (eds.) Representations and understanding. Studies in cognitive science. New York: LongmansGoogle Scholar
Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P
(1977) Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A
(1984) On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. and Sachs, H
(1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica 7: 289-327 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D
(1987) Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Searle, J
(1975) Indirect speech acts. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J.D. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics. vol. 5: Speech Acts. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
(1979) A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In J. Searle (ed.) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [First appeared in a volume ed. by K. Gunderson Language, Mind and Knowledge Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol VII.Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1975.]  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1979) Literal Meaning. In J. Searle (ed.) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [First appeared inErkenntnis, Vol 13. 1978]  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M
(1976) Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In K. Basso & H. Selby (eds.) Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico PressGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. and Coulthard, R.M
(1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Shatz, M
(1978) Children's comprehension of their mother's question-directives. Journal of Child Language 5: 39-46 Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M
(1983) Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Basic Blackwell  BoPGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L
(1985) Force Dynamics in language and thought. In Papers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics SocietyGoogle Scholar
(1988) Force Dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49-100  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Toulmin, S
(1958) The Uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E
(1989) On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31-53 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Twadell, W.T
(1963) The English verb auxiliaries. Providence R.I.: Brown University PressGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L
(1962) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. and Stone, A
(1985) The Concept of internalization. In J. Wertsch (ed.) Culture, cognition and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
White, A
(1975) Modal Thinking. Ithica: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Zubin, D
(1979) Discourse function of morphology: The Focus system in German. In T. Givon (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar