Constructing ethnic identity through discourse: Self-categorization among Korean American camp counselors

M. Agnes Kang


In this paper, I demonstrate how Korean American camp counselors locally construct ethnic identity through the practice of self-categorization in discourse. Self-categorization, or the identification of oneself in terms of ethnic identity, serves to position counselors in terms of Korean ethnicity and to associate that identity with one’s personal goals in participating in the Korean camp. Using videotaped data of counselors’ meetings, I show that while debating their views on what a Korean camp should be and their motivations for participating in the camp, counselors make relevant their ethnic identities by describing themselves as more ‘American’, more ‘Korean American’, or more ‘Korean’. In addition, the counselors discuss whether the teaching of Korean heritage or the mentorship of the campers should be the primary objective of the camp. This opposition between ‘heritage’ and ‘mentorship’ is cast as a source of tensions that map onto ideologies of identity, whereby ‘Korean American’ identity acquires the local meaning of being linked to the importance of mentorship over Korean heritage. In this way, counselors construct their ethnic identities as a means of classifying themselves relationally within a field of oppositions, at the same time indexing a particular stance about what a Korean camp should be.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Bakalian, Anny
(1993) Armenian-Americans: from being to feeling Armenian. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrik
(1969) Introduction. In Fredrik Barth (ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: the social organization of culture difference. Boston: Little, Brown, pp. 9-38.Google Scholar
Cornell, Stephen, and Douglas Hartmann
(1998) Ethnicity and race: making identities in a changing world. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards and Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-90.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Richard
(1994) Rethinking ethnicity: identity, categorization and power. Ethnic and racial studies 17: 197-223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kang, M. Agnes, and Adrienne Lo
Ms. Two ways of articulating heterogeneity in Korean American narratives of ethnic identity. Crossref
Ochs, Elinor
(1992) Indexing gender. In Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 335-359.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A
(1997) Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & society 8: 165-187. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
West, Candace, and Sarah Fenstermaker
(2002) Accountability in action: the accomplishment of gender, race and class in a meeting of the University of California Board of Regents. Discourse & society 13.4: 537-563. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wodak, Ruth
et al. (1999) The discursive construction of national identity, trans. by Angeliks Hirsch and Richard Mitten. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar