Metalinguistic activity, humor and social competence in classroom discourse

David Poveda


This paper examines the role that humor plays during an episode of classroom interaction. Using concepts derived from the ethnography of communication and interactional sociolinguistics, it analyzes activity during a metalinguistic event in a kindergarten classroom and argues that verbal humor, in itself a form of metalinguistic activity, plays a crucial role in the modulation of children’s face demands. The analysis also shows how humor is the result of the shared history of participants. The findings highlight the importance of considering emergent and improvised goals during classroom discourse that go beyond the prescribed curriculum.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Ashkenazi, O., & D. Ravid
(1998) Children’s understanding of linguistic humour: An aspect of metalinguistic awareness. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition 17.2: 367-387.Google Scholar
Bauman, R
(1977) Verbal art as performance. Prospect Heights: Waveland PressGoogle Scholar
(1986) Story, performance, and event: Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Beemam, W.O
(1999) Humor. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9.1-2: 103-106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borko, H., & R. Putnam
(1996) Learning to teach. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan, pp. 673-708.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cazden, C
(1988) Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1992) Whole language plus: Essays on literacy in the United States and New Zealand. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Corsaro, W
(1994) Discussion, debate and friendship processes: Peer discourse in U.S. and Italian nursery schools. Sociology of Education 67.1: 1-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dorr-Bremme, D
(1990) Contextualization cues in the classroom: Discourse regulation and social control functions. Language in Society 19: 379-402. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ely, R., & A. McCabe
(1994) The language play of kindergarten children. First language 14: 19-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F
(1982) Classroom discourse as improvisation: Relationship between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In L.C. Wilkinson (ed.), Communicating in the classroom. New York: Academic Press, pp. 153-181.Google Scholar
Goffman, E
(1967) Interaction ritual. Garden City: Doubleday.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gombert, J
(1992) Metalinguistic development. New York: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M
(1998) Games of stance: Conflict and footing in hopscotch. In S. Hoyle & C. Temple (eds.), Kids talk: Strategic language use in later childhood. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 23-46.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J
(1992) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-252.Google Scholar
Hymes, D
(1974) Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kantor, R; J. Green, M. Bradley, & L. Lin
(1992) The construction of schooled discourse repertories: An interactional sociolinguistic perspective on learning to talk in preschool. Linguistics and Education 4: 131-172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A
(1992) Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirschenblatt-Gimblett, B
(1979) Speech play and verbal art. In B. Sutton-Smith (ed.), Play and learning. New York: Gardner Press, pp. 219-238.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, H
(1995) Oral performance in interactional sociolinguistics: Humorous stories among friends. Toegepaste Taalwetenschap in Artikelen 52: 23-55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Irony, quotation and other forms of staged intertextuality: Double or contrastive perspectivation in conversation. InList: Interaction and Linguistic Structures 5 (http://​www​.ling​.unikonstanz​.de​/inlist).Google Scholar
(1999) Coherent keying in conversational humour: Contextualising joint fictionalisation. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk & E. Ventola (eds.), Coherence in spoken and written discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 125-150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, R
(1977) Social relations as contexts for learning in school. Harvard Educational Review 47: 198-213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, H
(1978) Structuring school structure. Harvard educational review 48: 32-64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Monfort, M., & A. Juárez
(1996) El niño que habla: El lenguaje oral en el preescolar, 6ª edición. Madrid: CEPE.Google Scholar
Nation, K., & M. Snowling
(2000) Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics 21: 229-241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, D; P. Griffin, & M. Cole
(1989) The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Osherson, D., & E. Markman
(1975) Language and the ability to evaluate contradictions and tautologies. Cognition 3: 213-226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips. S
(1972) Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Spring children in community and classroom. In C. Cazden, V. John & D. Hymes (eds.), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 370-394.Google Scholar
Piaget, J
(1984) La representación del mundo en el niño, 6 edición. Madrid: Morata.Google Scholar
Poveda, D
(2001)  La ronda in a Spanish kindergarten classroom with a cross-cultural comparison to sharing-time in the U.S.A. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 32.3: 301-325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, E
(1999) Recovering history in the study of schooling: From the longue durée to everyday coconstruction. Human Development 42.3: 113-128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohl, M., & C. Pratt
(1995) Phonological awareness, verbal working memory and the acquisition of literacy. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 7: 327-360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H
(1989) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sebastián, M., & A. Maldonado
(1998) La reflexión metalingüística: Algunas cuestiones teóricas y aplicadas. Estudios de Psicología 60: 79-94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snow, C; M.S. Burns, & P. Griffin
(eds.) (1998) Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington D.C: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Tsai, M., & G.E. García
(2000) Who’s the boss? How communicative competence is defined in a multilingual preschool classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 31.2: 230-252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W; C. Pratt, & M. Herriman
(eds.) (1984) Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research, and implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R., & C. Adelman
(1978) Fresas. In M. Stubbs & S. Delamont (eds.), Las relaciones profesoralumno. Barcelona: Oikos-Tau, pp. 149-168.Google Scholar