“You are not allowed to pull someone’s tail!” a cross-cultural comparison of socio-moral comments in Estonian and Swedish peer interaction

Boel De Geer and Tiia Tulviste

Abstract

The study compared the spontaneous use of verbal comments on socio-moral behavior in 20 Estonian and 22 Swedish kindergarten peer dyads during free play situations. All comments on Moral and Social- conventional rules were coded according to Piotrowski’s (1997) model, as well as according to outcomes (agreement, rejection, negotiation or silence). We found that Swedish children were more active in making socio-moral comments than the Estonian children, by commenting more on rules of Rights, Harm to others and Miscellaneous conventional rules. Both the Estonian and the Swedish children made more comments referring to social-conventional than to moral rules. As to outcomes, agreement was the most frequent type in the Swedish data, whereas silence dominated in the Estonian group. Also, the Estonian children rejected both moral and social-conventional rules more often than the Swedish children. Previous research in family dinner conversations in Estonia and Sweden has suggested a more egalitarian interaction pattern in the Swedish homes as well as daycare institutions and schools than in the Estonian equivalents (De Geer et al. 2002; Tulviste et al. 2002). A high amount of comments on socio-moral behavior, particularly comments on rights and harm to others, can be claimed to a further support for this claim.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Aronsson, Karin, & Ann-Carita Evaldsson
(1993) Pedagogic discourse and interaction orders: Sharing time and control. In: N. Coupland & J.F. Nussbaum (eds.), Discourse and lifespan identity. London: Sage Publications, pp. 103-131.Google Scholar
Aukrust, Vibeke Grøver, & Catherine Snow
(1998) Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the U.S. Language in Society 27: 221-246. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Becker, Judith
(1990) Processes in the acquisition of pragmatic competence. In: Gina Conti-Ramsden & Catherine Snow (eds.), Children’s Language 7. Hillsdale N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 7-24.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
(1990) You don’t touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 259-288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Dinner talk. Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, & Hadass Sheffer
(1993) The metapragmatic discourse of American-Israeli families at dinner. In Gabriele Kasper & Shoshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 196-223.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Daun, Åke
(1991) Individualism and collectivity among Swedes. Ethnos 56.3-4: 165-172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Boel
(2004) ”Don’t say it’s disgusting!” Comments on socio-moral behavior in Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics 36.9: 1705-1725. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Boel, & Tiia Tulviste
(2002) Behaviour regulation in the family context in Estonia and Sweden. Pragmatics 12.3: 329-346.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Boel, Tiia Tulviste, Luule Mizera, & Marja-Terttu Tryggvason
(2002) Socialization in communication: Pragmatic socialization during dinnertime in Estonian, Finnish and Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1757-1786. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
De Geer, Boel, Tiia Tulviste, & Luule Mizera
(2005) Regulation of behavior and attention in peer interaction in Estonia, Finland, and Sweden. Pragmatics 15.1: 1-24.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Judy, & Penny Munn
(1987) The development of justification in disputes with mother and sibling. Developmental Psychology 23: 791-798. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas
(1993) Being Norwegian in a shrinking world. In A. Kiel (ed.), Continuity and change: Aspects of contemporary Norway. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 11-37.Google Scholar
Evaldsson, Ann-Carita
(1993) Play, disputes and social order. Everyday life in two Swedish after-school centers. Linköping Studies of Arts and Science 93. Linköping: Linköping University.Google Scholar
Feilberg, Julie
(1991) To må man være. Mor-barn dialoger i et utviklingsperspektiv. University of Trondheim.Google Scholar
Haste, Helen
(1987) Growing into rules. In J. Bruner & H. Haste (eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world. London: Methuen, pp. 195.Google Scholar
Junefelt, Karin, & Tiia Tulviste
(1998) American, Estonian and Swedish mothers’ regulation of their children’s discourse construction. In Maria Lyra & Jaan Valsiner (eds.), Construction of Psychological Processes in Interpersonal Communication. Stanford, Conn.: Ablex Publishing Corporation, pp. 137-154.Google Scholar
Kivik, Piibi-Kai
(1998) What silence says: Communicative style and identity. Trames 2.52/47: 66-90.Google Scholar
Kuczynski, Leon, & Grazyna Kochanska
(1990) Development of children’s noncompliance strategies from toddlerhood to age 5. Developmental Psychology 26.3: 398-408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuczynski, Leon, Grazyna Kochanska, Maruab Radke-Yarrow, & Ona Girnius-Brown
(1987) A developmental interpretation of young children’s noncompliance. Developmental Psychology 23.6: 799-806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Löfgren, Orvar
(1993) The cultural grammar of nation-building: The nationalization of nationalism. In P. J. Antonnen & R. Kvideland (eds.), Nordic frontiers: Recent issues in the study of modern traditional culture in the Nordic countries. Turku: Nordic Institute of Folklore, pp. 217-238.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian
(1991) The CHILDES project. Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jasna
(1992) The collaborative development of power in children’s arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy. 29: 77-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Peggy, & Jacqueline Goodnow
(1995) Cultural practices: Toward an integration of culture and development. In J. Goodnow, P. Miller & F. Kessel (eds.), Cultural practices as contexts for development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 5-16.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Carolyn Taylor
(1992) Family narrative as political activity. Discourse and Society 3.3: 301-340. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
(1996) Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In John Gumperz & Stephen Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 407-437.Google Scholar
Piotrowski, Caroline
(1997) Rules of everyday life: The development of social rules in mother-child and sibling relationships. International Journal of Behavioural Development 21.3: 571-598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, Barbara
(1990) Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skogar, Björn
(2000) I stormens öga – några inledande teoretiska vägval i religionsdidaktiken. In E. Almén, R. Furenhed, S. Hartman & B. Skogar (eds.), Livstolkning och värdegrund. Att undervisa om religion, livsfrågor och etik. Linköpings universitet: Skapande vetande 37: 102-116.Google Scholar
Smetana, Judith
(1989) Toddlers’ social interactions in the context of moral and conventional transgressions in the home. Developmental Psychology 25: 499-508. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Understanding of social rules. In M. Bennett (ed.), The child as psychologis: An introduction to the development of social cognition. New York: Harvester, pp. 111-141.Google Scholar
Smetana, Judith, & Judith Braeges
(1990) The development of todders’ moral and conventional judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 36: 329-346.Google Scholar
Smetana, Judith, Naomi Schlagman, & Patricia Walsh Adams
(1993) Preschool children’s judgments about hypothetical and actual transgressions. Child Development 64: 202-214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smetana, Judith, Hugh Crean, & Nicole Campione-Barre
(2005) Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 108: 31-46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(1981) Indirectness in discourse: Ethnicity as conversational style. Discourse Processes 36.3: 221-238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tisak, Marie S., & Elliot Turiel
(1984) Children’s conceptions of moral and prudential rules. Child Development 55: 1030-1039. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tulviste, Tiia, & Marju Koor
(2005) “Hands off the car, it’s mine!” and “The teacher will be angry if we don’t play nicely”: Gender-related preferences in the use of moral rules and social conventions in preschoolers’ dyadic play. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 53: 57-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tulviste, Tiia, Luule Mizera, Boel De Geer, & Marja-Terttu Tryggvason
(2002) Verbal comments as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian, Swedish and Finnish mealtime interaction. Language in Society 31: 655-678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turiel, Elliot
(1983) The development of social knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar