Oral genres of humor: On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring

Helga Kotthoff

Abstract

The article discusses humorous conversational activities ((e.g. jokes, teasing, joint fantasizing) in the context of genre theory. The high degree of creativity, emergent construction and artistry typical of humor call for a flexible concept of genre which makes sense of modifications and transgressions in communicative processes. Some forms of conversational humor are generic, for example, standardized jokes, joint fantasizing or teasing. Other forms exploit our knowledge of serious genres and activity types (thereby relying on it): e.g. humorous stories about problems, humorous gossiping or counseling. Here the keying is done from the start in such a way that a serious mode of understanding is undermined. Generic boundaries are often transgressed and hybridized in joking; new sub-types arise, such as absurd meta-jokes which violate the well-known expectation of a punch-line or other features of the genre. Nevertheless, the realizations of these genres are related only by a sort of family resemblance. The concept of intertextuality plays another important role in analyzing oral genres of humor. Genre knowledge is also employed when the speakers violate expected patterns in such a way that further information is located precisely in the violation. The article shows humorous co-construction as an emergent phenomenon, which plays with genre knowledge.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Attardo, Salvatore
(1994) Linguistic Theories of Humor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter J.C
(1986) Kontextualisierung. Studium Linguistik 19: 22-48.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter
(2005) Syntax als Prozess. In List 41 URL
Bakhtin, Mikhail, M
(1986/1994) Speech genres. In Pam Morris (ed.), The Bakhtin Reader. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 80-87.Google Scholar
Bange, Pierre
(1986) Fiktion im Gespräch. In Werner Kallmeyer (ed.), Kommunikationstypologie. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp. 117-153.Google Scholar
Barbour, Stephen, and Patrick Stevenson
(1999) Variation in German. A critical approach to German sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
(1953) The position of humor in human communication. In H. von Forster (ed.), Cybernetics Ninth Conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, pp. 1-47.Google Scholar
(1954) A theory of play and phantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco: Chandler, pp. 177-193.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay
(2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Jörg R
(1987/1993) Discrete Indiscretions. The Social Organization of Gossip. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas N. Huckin
(1995) Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication. Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles, and Richard Bauman
(1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2.2: 131-172. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brünner, Gisela
(1991) Redewiedergabe in Gesprächen. Deutsche Sprache 1: 1-16.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert
(1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2004) Pragmatics of language performance. In Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics. London: Blackwell, pp. 365-383.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
(1999) Coherent voicing. On prosody in conversational reported speech. In Wolfram Bublitz, et al. (eds), Coherence in Spoken and written Discourse, pp. 11-35. (also published as InList-paper 1) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas
(2001) Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society 30.3: 345-375.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
(1987) Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25: 219-253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eder, Donna
(1993) "Go get ya a French!": Romantic and sexual teasing among adolescent girls. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 17-30.Google Scholar
Ehmer, Oliver
(2004) Spontane Inszenierungen in Alltagsgesprächen. Diplomarbeit, Universität Halle-Wittenberg.
Eisenberg, Ann R
(1986) Teasing: Verbal play in Mexican homes. In Bambi B. Schieffelin and Elinor Ochs (eds.), Language Socialization Across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182-199.Google Scholar
Foley, William A
(1997) Anthropological Linguistics. An Introduction. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Glenn, Phillip
(2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
(1996) Zwischen Scherz und Schmerz. Frotzelaktivitäten im Alltag. In Helga Kotthoff (ed.), Scherzkommunikation. Beiträge aus der empirischen Gesprächsforschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 81-109.Google Scholar
(1999) Polyphony and the 'layering of voices' in reported dialogue: An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 685-708. (also published as InList-paper 3) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, and Hubert Knoblauch
(1995) Culturally patterned speaking practices - the analysis of communicative genres. Pragmatics 5.1: 1-32.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
(1990) Sarcasm as theater. Cognitive Linguistics 1-2: 181-205. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hanks, William
(1995) Language and Communicative Practice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang
(1992) Staging as an anthropological category. New Literary History 23.4: 877-888. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1960) Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Thomas Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 350-377.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Max Atkinson and John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 346-269.Google Scholar
(1985) An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In Teun A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol 3. London: Academic Press, pp. 25-34.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, Hubert, and Helga Kotthoff
(2002) (eds.) Verbal Art across Cultures. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur
(1964) The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson. (Dt. 1966): Der göttliche Funke. Bern/München/Wien: Scherz.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
(1996) Impoliteness and conversational joking: On relational politics. Folia Linguistica XXX.3-4: 299-327.Google Scholar
(1998) Spaß Verstehen. Zur Pragmatik von konversationellem Humor. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Irony, citation, and other forms of staged intertextuality. In Carl F. Graumann and Werner Kallmeyer (eds.), Perspectivity in Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 201-233. (also published as InList-paper 5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Artistische Dimensionen der Alltagsrede. Performanzorientierte Mündlichkeit bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Muttersprache, Vierteljahresschrift für deutsche Sprache, Jahrgang 115: 320-338.Google Scholar
(2006a) Humor and gender. The state of the art. Journal of Pragmatics 1 (vol. 38): 4-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humor. Humor 19-3: 271-304. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2007) The humorous stylization of “new” women and men and conservative others. In Peter Auer (ed.) Variation and social identity New York/Berlin de Gruyter forthcoming
Muntigl, Peter, and Helmut Gruber
(2005) Introduction: Approaches to genre. Folia Linguistics XXXIX.1-2: 1-18.Google Scholar
Lampert, Martin D., and Susan M. Ervin-Tripp
(2006) Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics 1.(vol. 38): 51-73. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Legman, Gershon
(1970) Der unanständige Witz. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
(1986) Grundformen der gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung des Wissens: Kom-munikative Gattungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 27: 513-523.Google Scholar
Luckmann
(2002) Kommunikation. In Thomas Luckmann, Wissen und Gesellschaft. Ausgewählte Aufsätze 1981-2002. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag, pp. 157-201.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R
(1993) Conversational Joking. Humor in Everyday Talk. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2000) Conversational Narrative. Storytelling in Everyday Talk. Amsterdam: Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R
(1940) On joking relationships. In Structure and Function in Primitive Society. (1965). New York/London: Cohen/West, pp. 90-104.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1974) An analysis of the course of a joke's telling in conversation. In Richard Bauman and Joel Sherzer (eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337-353.Google Scholar
(1978) Some technical considerations of a dirty joke. In Jim Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 249-275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold
(1992) Die Schwellensteher. Sprachliche Präsenz und sozialer Austausch an einem Kiosk. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
(1985) Relevance. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Straehle, Carolyn A
(1993) "Samuel?" "Yes, Dear?": Teasing and conversational rapport. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Framing in Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 210-229.Google Scholar
Swales, John M
(1990) Genre Analysis. English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, Valentin N
(1929/1975) Marxismus und Sprachphilosophie. Frankfurt/Berlin/Wien: Ull-stein.Google Scholar