“Moral irony”: Modal particles, moral persons and indirect stance-taking in Sakapultek discourse

Robin Shoaps

Abstract

This paper presents an ethnographically sensitive account of a family of modal constructions in Sakapultek, a Mayan language spoken in highland Guatemala. The constructions in question share many characteristics with those that have been analyzed as ironic in English and are dubbed “moral irony,” due both to their similarities to irony in other languages and to their primary interactional function. The morphosyntactic composition and semiotic processes involved in moral irony are described and the proposed account of these semiotic properties makes use of Goffman’s distinction between author, animator and principal as dimensions of the speaker role. The indexical properties of moral irony are demonstrated and it is argued that they play a greater role in determining ironic meaning than speaker intentions. Using extended examples from naturally-occurring talk, the paper also demonstrates how irony functions in evaluative stance-taking in Sakapultek. Such examples illustrate both the relatively presupposing and entailing aspects of moral irony’s indexical meaning. Moral irony is argued to be modal in that it projects hypothetical or unreal possible worlds and ironic in that it indirectly and negatively evaluates the stances of an imagined principal. Finally, on the ethnographic level, moral irony is examined in light of what it reveals about Sakapultek notions of moral personhood.

Keywords:
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Agha, Asif
(2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
(1981) The dialogic imagination. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, trans., Michael Holquist, ed. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard
(1983) Let your words be few: Symbolism of speaking and silence among Seventeenth Century Quakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald
(1986) Shared territory: Audience, indirection and meaning. Text 6: 339-347.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Jill
(1991) Indirection in the negotiation of self in everyday Tojolab'al women's conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1.1: 78-97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope
(1990) Gender, politeness and confrontation in Tenejapa. Discourse Processes 13: 121-141. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1995) Politeness strategies and the attribution of intentions: The case of Tzeltal irony. In E. Goody (ed.), Social intelligence and interaction: Expressions and implications of the social bias in human intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153-174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Everyone has to lie in Tzeltal. In S. Blum-Kulka and C. Snow (eds.), Talking to adults The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, pp. 241-275.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
(1998) Irrealis as a grammatical category. Anthropological Linguistics 40.2: 257-271.Google Scholar
Cancian, Frank
(1965) Economics and prestige in a Maya community: The religious cargo system in Zinacantán. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Chance, John, and William Taylor
(1985)  Cofradias and cargos: A historical perspective on the Mesoamerican civil-religious hierarchy. American Ethnologist 12.1: 1-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clift, Rebecca
(1999) Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28: 523-553. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Colston, Herbert L
(1997) Salting a wound or sugaring a pill: The pragmatic functions of ironic criticism. Discourse Processes 23.1: 25-45. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner
(1995) Why not say it directly? The social functions of irony. Discourse Processes 19.3: 347-367. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John
(1981) The Sacapultec language. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley. ProQuest accession number AAT 8211912.
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
(1993) Outline of discourse transcription. In J. Edwards and M. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 45-90.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro
(1985) Famous theories and local theories: The Samoans and Wittgenstein. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 7.2: 46-51.Google Scholar
(1992) Intentions, self and responsibility. In J. Hill and J. Irvine, (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24-47.Google Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo, and Diana Boxer
(2006) Reactions to irony in discourse: Evidence for the least disruption principle. Journal of Pragmatics 38.8: 1239-1256. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Giora, Rachel
(1995) On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19: 239-264. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2002) Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics 34: 487-506. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2003) On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Crossref  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul
(1989) Meaning revisited. In Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 283-303.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
(1989) Alienation in grammar. Studies in Language 13: 129-70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Talk is cheap, sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael
(2001) Irony and power: Toward a politics of mockery in Greece. In J. Fernandez and M. Huber (eds.), Irony in action: Anthropology, practice and the moral imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-84.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
(1971) Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. In L. Waugh and M. Monville-Burston (eds.), On language: Roman Jakobson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 386-392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
(1975) New Mayan languages in Guatemala: Sacapultec, Sipacapa, and others. In M. McClaran (ed.), Mayan linguistics, vol. 1. Los Angeles: University of California, American Indian Studies Center, pp. 67-89.Google Scholar
(1976) Proyecto de alfabetos y ortografias para escribir las lenguas mayanses. Guatemala: Proyecto Lingüístico Francisco Marroquín.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb
(2002) Sincerity, “modernity,” and the Protestants. Cultural Anthropology 1: 65-92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Elinor Ochs
(1976) The universality of conversational postulates. Language in Society 5.1: 67-80. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul
(2002) Subjectivity as stance under neoliberal governance: Language and labor, mind and measure, among the Q’eqchi’-Maya. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Chicago. ProQuest accession number AAT 3060226.
(2005) Stance and subjectivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14.2: 127-150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
(1991) The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
(2003) Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 35.9: 1387-1411. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kulick, Don, and Bambi Schieffelin
(2004) Language socialization. In A. Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 349-368.Google Scholar
Lee, Benjamin
(1997) Talking heads: Language, metalanguage and the semiotics of subjectivity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Jacqueline, Jeffrey Hancock, and Philip Dunham
(2006) The roles of politeness and humor in the asymmetry of affect in verbal irony. Discourse Processes 41.1: 3-24. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel
(1985) A category of the human mind: The notion of person, the notion of self. In M. Carrithers, et al.. (eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-25.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
(1995) On the relativity of irreality. In J. Bybee and S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 367-388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Refaie, Elisabeth
(2005) ‘Our purebred ethnic compatriots’: Irony in newspaper journalism. Journal of Pragmatics 37.6: 781-797. Crossref  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle
(1982) The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11: 203-237. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1984) Toward an anthropology of self and feeling. In R. Shweder and R. Levine (eds.), Culture theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 137-157.Google Scholar
Scheibman, Joanne
(2002) Point of view and grammar: Structural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
(1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1983) Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Metaphor. In S. Davis (ed.), Pragmatics: A reader. Oxford & N.Y.: Oxford University Press, pp. 519-539.Google Scholar
Shoaps, Robin
(1999) The many voices of Rush Limbaugh: The use of transposition in constructing a rhetoric of common sense. Text 19.3: 399-437.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Pray earnestly:” The textual construction of personal involvement in Pentecostal prayer and song. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12.1: 34-71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004a) Conditionals and moral reasoning in Sakapultek discourse. Paper presented at the joint meeting of the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the Americas and the Linguistic Society of America, January9 2004, Boston, MA.
(2004b) Morality in grammar and discourse: Evaluative stance-taking and the negotiation of moral personhood in Sakapultek Mayan wedding counsels. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara. ProQuest accession number AAT 3145760.
Silverstein, Michael
(1976) Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In K. Basso and H. Selby (eds.), Meaning in anthropology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pp. 11-56.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan
(1984) Verbal irony: Pretense or echoic mention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 130-36. Crossref  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deidre Wilson
(1981) Irony and the use-mention distinction. In P. Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 295-318.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles
(1989) Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
(1995) Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein and S. Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, John
(1992) Mayan saints and souls in a changing world. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
(1956) The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. Carroll (ed.), Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 134-159.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deidre, and Dan Sperber
(1992) On verbal irony. Lingua 87: 53-76. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar