How to read Austin

Marina Sbisà


The goal of this paper is a reassessment of the contributions provided by John L. Austin’s book “How to Do Things with Words” to pragmatics. It discusses some assumptions belonging to the received reading of the volume, as regards its aim and structure, the conceptions of illocution and of perlocution, and the alleged exclusion of “non-seriousness”. Against the received reading, it is argued that “How to Do Things with Words” is structured as a proof by contradiction of the claim that all speech should be considered as action, that in illocution a major role is played by the conventionality of effects, that perlocution presupposes a conception of action as responsibility, and that Austin had reasons not to deal with “non-seriousness” in detail, albeit recognizing the issue as relevant to the study of the uses of language. In the conclusions, the tenets attributed to Austin are neither crtiticized nor defended, but an attempt is made to say what are their implications for research into language use and for philosophy.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Austin, John L
(1956) A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57. Repr. in J.L. Austin 1970: 175-204.Google Scholar
(1957) Pretending. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 32. Repr. in J.L. Austin 1970: 253-271.Google Scholar
(1962) How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2nd revised edition 1975.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1966) Three ways of spilling ink. The Philosophical Review 75. Repr. in J.L. Austin 1970: 272-287.Google Scholar
(1970) Philosophical Papers (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish
(1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Black, Max
(1963) Austin on Performatives. Philosophy 38: 217-263. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Caffi, Claudia
(1999) On mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 881-909. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Crary, Alice
(2002) The happy truth: J.L. Austin's How to Do Things with Words. Inquiry 45: 59-80.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
(1972) Signature événement contexte. In J. Derrida, Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Minuit, pp. 365-93.Google Scholar
Forguson, L.W
(1966) In pursuit of performatives. Philosophy 41: 341-47. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
(1980) Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341-350. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin
(1970) A Theory of Human Action. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1981) Footing. In Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 124-157.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
(1993) The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics 20: 405-32. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
(1984) On illocutionary types. Journal of Pragmatics 8: 93-112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà Marina
(2001) Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1791-1814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sbisà, Marina
(2006) Communicating citizenship in verbal interaction: Principles of a speech act oriented discourse analysis. In H. Hausendorf & A. Bora (eds.), Analysing Citizenship Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 151-180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
John R. Searle
(1969) Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1979) Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R
(1977) Reiterating the differences: A reply to Derrida. Glyph. John Hopkins Textual Studies 1.Google Scholar
Strawson, Peter F
(1964) Intention and convention in speech acts. Philosophical Review 73: 439-460. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yeager, Daniel
(2006) J.L. Austin and the law. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar