Not so impersonal: Intentionality in the use of pronoun uno in contemporary Spanish political discourse

Jaime J. Gelabert-Desnoyer


This paper combines quantitative and qualitative analyses in a corpus-based study of how and for what purposes politicians, in the context of the Spanish Parliament, use the impersonal pronoun uno ‘one’. I begin by contrasting how uno is used in parliamentary debate versus non-political language. After reviewing traditional definitions of the semantic range and general behavior of this pronoun, I argue that a more accurate account that the one provided by standard grammars is needed for us to better understand how the peculiar characteristics of a parliament affect intentionality in the use of impersonal pronouns. In particular, it is argued that uno is utilized by politicians to serve principally two purposes: 1) avoidance of bluntness - a means of preserving professional etiquette, and 2) avoidance of self- praise - demonstrative of humility. Both purposes serve the larger objective of preserving professional face.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Álvarez Martínez, and María Ángeles
(1989) El pronombre (I). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Beard, Adrian
(2000) The language of politics. London: Routledge.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Blas-Arroyo, José L
(2000) Mire usted Sr. González…Personal deixis in Spanish political-electoral debate. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1-27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) ‘Perdóneme que se lo diga, pero vuelve usted a faltar a la verdad señor González’: Form and function of politic verbal behaviour in face-to-face Spanish political debates. Discourse and Society 14.4: 395- 423. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P., & A. Gilman
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T.A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in language. New York: MIT, pp. 253-76.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & S. Levinson
(1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Peter
(2003) The microanalysis of political communication. Claptrap and ambiguity. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & M. McCarthy
(2002) From conversation to corpus: A dual analysis of a broadcast political interview. In A. Sánchez Macarro (ed.), Windows of the world: Media discourse in English. Valencia: University of Valencia Press, pp. 15-39.Google Scholar
Chilton, Paul A
(2001) Analysing the language of politics: Xenophobic and racist discourse. In O. Panagl, H. Goebl and E. Brix, Der Mensch und seine Sprache(n). Vienna: Böhlau, pp. 157-190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.  MetBib. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna
(1995) Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text 15.3: 379- 410.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DRAE (Diccionario de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua)
(2001) Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
Fairclough, Norman
(2000) New labour, new language? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández Ramírez, Salvador
(1987) Gramática española 3.2. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Fortanet, Inmaculada
(2004) The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes 23: 45-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A
(1992) Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geis, Michael L
(1987) The language of politics. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gervasi, Kareen
(2007) The use of Spanish impersonal forms in monolingual and bilingual speech. Hispania 90.2: 342-353.Google Scholar
Gómez Torrego, Leonardo
(1992) La impersonalidad gramatical. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol 3: Speech acts. New York. Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra
(1991) Evasive action: How politicians respond to questions in political interviews. In P. Scannell (ed.), Broadcast talk. London: Sage, pp. 76-92.Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
(2003) Discourse and metadiscourse in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics 2.1: 71-92.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Íñigo-Mora, Isabel
(2004) On the use of the personal pronoun we in communities. Journal of Language and Politics 3.1: 27-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Juliver, P., & S. Stroschein
(1999) Missing boundaries of comparison: The political community. Political Science Quarterly 114.3: 435-453. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, K., & J. Wilson
(1987) Pronominal selection and ideological conflict. Journal of Pragmatics 11: 495-512. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Martínez, José. A
(1989) El pronombre (vol.2). Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Mendikoetxea, Amaya
(1999) Construcciones con se: Medias, pasivas e impersonales. In I. Bosque and V. Demonte (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española 2. Madrid: Espasa Calpe, pp. 1635- 1722.Google Scholar
Morales, E., and G. Prego
(2002) Entrevistas electorales en las campañas políticas para la presidencia del gobierno de 1996 y 2000. Oralia5. 02: 203-45.Google Scholar
Obeng, Samuel G
(1997) Language and politics: Verbal indirection in political discourse. Discourse and Society 8.1: 49-83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otaola, Concepción
(2000) Lexicometría y enunciación en el discurso político. In Bustos, Charaudeau, Girón, Iglesias and López (eds.), Lengua, Discurso, Texto (I Simposio Internacional de Análisis del Discurso) Madrid: Visor Libros, pp. 2405-2417.Google Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair
(1994) The politics of pronouns. ELTJ 48.2: 173-178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Michael
(2004) Wordsmith tools. (computer software). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolmach-Lakoff, Robin
(1990) The language war. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A
(2000) Parliamentary debates. In R. Wodak and T.A. Van Dijk (eds.), Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethic issues in six European States. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag, pp. 45-78.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk. Teun A
(2005) War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics 4.1: 65-91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joseph
(1990) Politically speaking. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zupnik, Yael J
(1994) A pragmatic analysis or the use of person deixis in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 339-383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar