‘It seems my enemy is about having malaria’: The sociocultural context of verbal irony in Nigeria

Felix Nwabeze Ogoanah

Abstract

This study seeks to characterise the form of verbal irony common among Nigerians by identifying its motivation, inherent properties, and communicative value. Data for this study comprised detailed field notes taken within the last five years in contexts in which utterances occurred naturally. These were then tested among informants from diverse ethnic and linguistic backgrounds at the University of Benin to determine the prevalence and motivation of the ironic utterances. In addition, 500 questionnaires were administered to a group of students and staff in the same institution. These were analysed using frequency tables and simple percentages. Results support the claim that irony in this context is governed by a single cultural principle: “You hurt yourself by admitting a negative situation.” Although the study draws heavily from the relevance-theoretic echoic account, it seeks to reevaluate this account by suggesting that positive attitudes in negative situations are salient cultural notions that underlie the echoic account in this context.

Keywords:
Publication history
Table of contents

Contentions about verbal irony as a subject of intellectual inquiry have increased in the last three decades and many strands of the notion have emerged, especially in the pragmatics literature (Simpson 2011). Numerous labels for the various strands of the notion have evolved and so have detailed explanations based on the authors’ theoretical orientations and intuitions. For example, verbal irony may now be seen as an overt untruthfulness (Grice 1989), as pretense (Clark and Gerrig 1984), as relevant inappropriateness (Attardo 2000), as an implicit display (Utsumi 2000), as a pragmatic insincerity or ‘allusional pretense’ (Kumon-Nakamura et al. 1995), as a reversal of evaluation (Partington 2007), as a non-deliberate act (Gibbs 2012), as critical (Garmendia 2000, 2018), as simply echoic (Sperber and Wilson 1981), or as both pretense and echoic at the same time (Papa-Wyatt 2014). This list is not exhaustive.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Abrams, Meyer H., and Geoffrey G. Harpham
2005A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
2000 “Irony as Relevant Inappropriateness.” Journal of Pragmatics 32, 9–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailin, Alan
2015 “On the Characteristics of Verbal Irony.” Semiotica 204: 101–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boutonnet, Josiane
2009 “Irony: Stylistic Approaches.” In Concise Encyclopaedia of Pragmatics, ed. by Jacob L. Mey, 408–411. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn
1991 “Implicatures, Explicature and Truth-theoretical Semantics.” In Pragmatics: A Reader, ed. by Steven Davis, 60–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, and Richard Gerrig
1984 “On the Pretence Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113: 121–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colebrooks, Claire
2004Irony. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curcó, Carmen
2002 “Irony: Negation, Echo and Metarepresentation.” Lingua 110: 257–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Currie, Gregory
2006 “Why Irony is Pretense.” In The Architecture of the Imagination, ed. by Shaun Nichols, 111–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2013 “Irony from a Neo-Gricean Perspective: On Untruthfulness and Evaluative Implicature.” Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (3): 403–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garmendia, Joana
2000 “Irony is Critical.” Pragmatics and Cognition 18: 397–421. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Irony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond
2007 “Irony in Talks among Friends.” In Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs Jr., and Herbert L. Colston, 339–360. New York: Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Are Ironic Acts Deliberate?Journal of Pragmatics 44: 104–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond, and Herbert Colston
2012Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Paul H.
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006 “The Structure of Patients’ Presenting Concerns: Physicians’ Opening Questions.” Health Communication 19 (2): 89–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knoblauch, Hubert
2001 “Communication, Context and Culture: A Communicative Constructivist Approach to Intercultural Communication.” In Culture Communication: Analyses of Intercultural Situations, ed. by Aldo Di Luzio, Susanne Günthner, and Franca Orletti, 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kumon-Nakamura, Sachi, Sam Glucksberg, and Mary Brown
1995 “How About Another Piece of Pie: The Allusional Pretense Theory of Discourse Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124: 2–21Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Christine E. Link
2002 “Asymmetries in the Use of Verbal Irony.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 21 (2): 127–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laval, Virginie, and Alain Bert-Erboul
2005 “French-speaking Children’s Understanding of Sarcasm: The Role of Intonation and Context.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48: 610–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noveck, Ira, and Dan Sperber
2012 “The Way and How of Experimental Pragmatics: The Case of Scalar Inferences.” In Relevance and Meaning, ed. by Deidre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 307–330. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papa-Wyatt, Michaela
2014 “Pretense and Echo: Towards an Integrated Account of Verbal Irony.” International Review of Pragmatics 5: 127–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
2007 “Irony and the Reversal of Evaluation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1547–1569. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Recanati, Francois
2004Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco J., and Ines Lozano-Palecio
2019 “A Cognitive-linguistic Approach to Complexity in Irony: Dissecting the Ironic Echo.” Metaphor and Symbol 34 (2): 127–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Paul
2011 “ ‘It’s Not Ironic, That’s Just Stupid:’ Towards an Eclectic Account of the Discourse of Irony.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 33–50. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen D.
2000 “Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis.” In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, ed. by Helen D. Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1981 “Irony and the Use-Mention Distribution.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 295–318. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
1995Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1998 “Irony and Relevance: A Reply to Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanoshi.” In Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, ed. by Robyn Carston, and Seiji Uchida, 283–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toolan, Michael
1996Total Speech: An Integrational Linguistic Approach to Language. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Utsumi, Akira
2000 “Verbal Irony as Implicit Display of Ironic Environment: Distinguishing Ironic Utterances from Non Irony”. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1777–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Laaken, Manon, and Annw Bannink
2020 “Openings in Follow-up Cancer Consultations: The ‘How Are You?’ Question Revisited.” Discourse Studies 22 (2): 205–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
1998 “Discourse, Coherence and Relevance: A Reply to Rechel Giora.” Journal of Pragmatics 29: 57–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?Lingua 116: 1722–1743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Irony Comprehension: A Developmental Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 40–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Irony, Hyperbole, Jokes and Banter.” In Formal Models in the Study of Language: Applications in Interdisciplinary Contexts, ed. by Joanna Blochowiak, Cristina Girsot, Stephania Durriemann, and Christopher Laenzlinger, 201–220. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 “Relevance Theory and Literary Interpretation.” In Reading Beyond the Code: Literature and Relevance Theory, ed. by Terence Cave, and Deidre Wilson, 185–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
1992 “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87: 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Explaining Irony.” In Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deidre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 124–145. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2003 “Humour and the Search for Relevance.” Journal of Pragmatics 25: 1295–1331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zegarac, Vladimir
2000 “Culture and Communication.” In Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theory, ed. by Helen D. Spencer-Oatey 48–69. London: Continuum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar