Introduction reframing framing: Interaction and the constitution of culture and society

Joseph Sung-Yul Park and Hiroko Takanashi


This special issue revisits the notion of framing based on several recent developments in the fields of sociolinguistics, discourse analysis, and linguistic anthropology, particularly the current interest in the notions of stance, style, metalinguistics and language ideology. In doing so, the contributions highlight the importance of framing not only in the management of micro-level interactional practices but also in the reproduction of cultural ideologies and social relations.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Agha, Asif
(2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory
(1972) A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company, pp. 177-193.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard
(1977) Verbal art as performance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(2004) A world of others' words: Cross-cultural perspectives on intertextuality. Malden: Blackwell. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs
(1990) Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59-88. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L., and Richard Bauman
(1992) Genre, intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 2.2: 131-172. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall
(2005) Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7: 585-614. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W
(2001) Towards a dialogic syntax. Ms., University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
(2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, Robert (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 139–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
(2004) The meaning of style. In Wai Fong Chiang, Elaine Chun, Laura Mahalingappa, and Siri Mehus, (eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society – Austin. Texas Linguistic Forum Vol. 47: 41–53.Google Scholar
(2008) Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 453-476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, and John R. Rickford
(eds.) (2001) Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) (2007) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kathryn A. Woolard
(eds.) (2001) Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
(1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia
(2002) “I’m Mommy and you’re Natalie”: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother–child discourse. Language in Society 31: 679–720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) A(p)parent play: Blending frames and reframing in family talk. Language in Society 37: 319-349. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) The linguistic and cultural relativity of conversational inference. In John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 374-406.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2001) Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 215–228.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H
(2001) Mock Spanish, covert racism, and the (leaky) boundary between public and private spheres. In Susan Gal and Kathryn Woolard (eds.), Languages and publics: The making of authority. Manchester: St. Jerome, pp. 83-102.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H., and Judith T. Irvine
(eds.) (1993) Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Geoff Thompson
(eds.) (2000) Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
(ed.) (2009) Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.  BoP CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, Nikolas Coupland, and Dariusz Galasiński
(eds.) (2004) Metalanguage: Social and ideological perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V
(ed.) (2000) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2004) Language ideologies. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 496-517.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael
(2008) The poetics of stance: Text-metricality, epistemicity, interaction. Language in Society 37: 569-592. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A
(ed.) (1993) Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Oropeza-Escobar, M
(2011) Represented Discourse, Resonance and Stance in Joking Interaction in Mexican Spanish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Rampton, Ben
(ed.) (1999) Styling the other. Special issue of Journal of Sociolinguistics 3.4. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B., Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity
(eds.) (1998) Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
(1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 193-247.Google Scholar
(1985) Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage, and ideology. In Elizabeth Mertz and Richard Parmentier (eds.), Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 219-259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban
(eds.) (1996) Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
(ed.) (1993) Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2004) Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37: 399–420. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(2006) Intertextuality in action: Reframing family arguments in public and private. Text & Talk 26: 597–617. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, and Cynthia Wallat
(1987) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. Social Psychology Quarterly50.2: 205-216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A
(1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-47.  BoPGoogle Scholar