From subordination to coordination? verb-second position in German causal and concessive constructions

Susanne Günthner
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Arndt, Erwin
(1956) Die begründenden Sätze im Neuhochdeutschen und ihre wichtigsten Konjunktionen. Dissertation. Humboldt Universität: Berlin.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
(1984) How people use adverbial clauses. In C. Brugman and M. Macaulay (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 437-449.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
(1989) Grundriß der Deutschen Grammatik. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A. & Robert D. Van Valin
(1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia
(1993) Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1994) Dialogic aspects of talk and writing: Because on the interactive-edited continuum. Text 14.4: 531-554.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Junko Mori
(1994) Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics 4.1: 31-61.  BoP DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaumann, Ulrike
(1982) Weil die machen jetzt bald zu’. Dissertation, Universität Mainz.Google Scholar
Green, Georgia
(1976) Main clause phenomena in subordinate. Language 52: 382-397. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
(1993a) ‘… weil – man kann es ja wissenschaftlich untersuchen’ -Diskurspragmatische Aspekte der Wortstellung in WEIL-Sätzen. Linguistische Berichte 143: 37-59.Google Scholar
(1993b) Diskursstrategien in der Interkulturellen Kommunikation. Analysen deutschchinesischer Gespräche. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Exemplary stories: The cooperative construction of indignation. Versus 70/71: 147-175.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
.& Ruqaiya Hasan (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A Thompson
(1994) Introduction. Text 14.4: 461-463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott
(1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Keller, Rudi
(1993) Das epistemische WEIL. Bedeutungswandel einer Konjunktion. In HJ. Heringer & G. Stötzel (eds.), Sprachgeschichte und Sprachkritik. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter, pp. 219-247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
(1985) On the history of concessive connectives in English. Qiachronic and synchronic evidence. Lingua 66: 363-381. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1988) Concessive connectives and concessive sentences: Crosslinguistic regularities and pragmatic principles. In J.A Hawkins (eds.), Explaining Language Universals. New York: Basil Blackwell, pp. 145-166.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Peter Eisenberg
(1984) Zur Pragmatik von Konzessivsätzen. In G. Stickel (ed.), Pragmatik in der Grammatik. Düsseldorf: Schwann, pp. 313-332.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera
(1988) Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 101-133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Küper, Christoph
(1984) Zum sprechaktbezogenen Gebrauch der Kausalverknüpfer DENN und WEIL: Grammatisch-pragmatische Interrelationen. Linguistische Berichte 92: 15-30.Google Scholar
(1991) Geht die Nebensatzstellung im Deutschen verloren? Zur pragmatischen Funktion der Wortstellung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Deutsche Sprache 19: 133-158.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
(1988) Towards a typology of clause linkage. In J. Haiman & S.A Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 181-226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991) Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 493-535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
(1991) On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society 20.3: 441-458. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
(1994) Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse. Manuscript. University of California.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder
(1983) Natural selection in syntax: Notes on adaptive variation and change in vernacular and literary grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 551-579. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
(1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
(1987) On the preference for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J.R. Lee (eds.), Talk and social organisation. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, pp. 54-69.Google Scholar
Sandig, Barbara
(1973) Zur historischen Kontinuität normativ diskriminierender syntaktischer Muster in spontaner Sprechsprache. Deutsche Sprache 3: 37-57.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret
(1995) Prosodie im Gespräch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E
(1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
(1987) ‘Concessive’ as a discourse relation in expository written English. In: B. Joseph & A.M. Zwickey (eds.), A Festschrift for Use Lehiste. Ohio State University, pp. 64-73.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Ekkehard König
(1991) The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 189-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Heide
(1994) weil – das hat schon seinen Grund. Zur Verbstellung in Kausalsätzen mit WEIL im gegenwärtigen Deutsch. Deutsche Sprache 4: 289-305.Google Scholar
Willems, Klaus
(1994) weil es hat mit Bedeutung nicht viel zu tun… Zum Sprachwandel einer Konjunktion. Deutsche Sprache 3: 261-279.Google Scholar