The semantics of coming and going

Cliff Goddard

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Fillmore, Charles J
(1966) D eictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 2: 219-27.Google Scholar
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1983) How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh [Ed.], Essays on Deixis. Tubigen: Narr, pp. 219-227.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia C
(1977) A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol 2: 61-94.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(1991) Testing the translatability of semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal language. Anthropological Linguistics 33.1: 31-56.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(Ed.) (1997) Studies in the Syntax of Universal Semantic Primitives. Special Issue of Language Sciences 19(3). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(In Press 1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (Forthcoming) The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes Oxford Oxford University Press
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7.1: 93-129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
(1981) [1765] New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathon Bennet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John
(1976) [1690] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged and edited with an introduction by John W. Yolton. London: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
(1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
(1917) M ysticism and logic and other essays. 2nd Edition. London: G eorge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard
(1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stanwood, Ryo E
(1993) The hitchhiker’s guide to SHAKE, WAVE, SWING, and WAG. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawai’i 22.2: 141-147.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen [Ed.], Language typology and syntactic description Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-149.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine
(1980) Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1972) Semantic Primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill
(1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3: 209-259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar