The semantics of coming and going

Cliff Goddard
Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Fillmore, Charles J
(1966) D eictic categories in the semantics of come. Foundations of Language 2: 219-27.Google Scholar
(1975) Santa Cruz lectures on deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
(1983) How to know whether you’re coming or going. In G. Rauh [Ed.], Essays on Deixis. Tubigen: Narr, pp. 219-227.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Virginia C
(1977) A study of the comings and goings of the speakers of four languages: Spanish, Japanese, English, and Turkish. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol 2: 61-94.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(1991) Testing the translatability of semantic primitives into an Australian Aboriginal language. Anthropological Linguistics 33.1: 31-56.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (1994) Semantic and Lexical Universals: Theory and empirical findings. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
(Ed.) (1997) Studies in the Syntax of Universal Semantic Primitives. Special Issue of Language Sciences 19(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(In Press 1998) Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff and Anna Wierzbicka
(Eds.) (Forthcoming) The Universal Syntax of Semantic Primes Oxford Oxford University Press
Jackendoff, Ray
(1983) Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1996) Conceptual semantics and cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 7.1: 93-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm
(1981) [1765] New Essays Concerning Human Understanding. Translated by Peter Remnant and Jonathon Bennet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
(1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locke, John
(1976) [1690] An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Abridged and edited with an introduction by John W. Yolton. London: Everyman’s Library.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
(1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Miller, George A. and Philip N. Johnson-Laird
(1976) Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand
(1917) M ysticism and logic and other essays. 2nd Edition. London: G eorge Allen & Unwin Ltd.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard
(1988) Matter, Space and Motion. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Stanwood, Ryo E
(1993) The hitchhiker’s guide to SHAKE, WAVE, SWING, and WAG. Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Hawai’i 22.2: 141-147.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
(1985) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen [Ed.], Language typology and syntactic description Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57-149.Google Scholar
Tanz, Christine
(1980) Studies in the Acquisition of Deictic Terms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
(1972) Semantic Primitives. Translated by Anna Wierzbicka and John Besemeres. Frankfurt: Athenäum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1980) Lingua Mentalis: The Semantics of Natural Language. Sydney: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1988) The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1991) Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  BoP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1992) Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1996) Semantics, Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. and Deborah Hill
(1995) When “go” means “come”: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6.2/3: 209-259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar