Quote – unquote? the role of prosody in the contextualization of reported speech sequences

Gabriele Klewitz and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen

Abstract

This paper investigates how speakers of English can use the prosodic design of utterances to identity parts of these utterances as instances of reported speech. We will show that prosodic changes can function like quotation marks in written texts by clearly delimiting left and right hand boundaries of the reported sequence. In the majority of cases, however, prosodic changes do not coincide with the boundaries of reported speech but occur nearby, functioning like a 'frame' for the interpretation of a sequence as reported or even only as a 'flag' attracting attention and inviting the listener to actively (re-)construct the corresponding boundaries. Our data analysis also provides evidence for the use of prosodic designs to typify a figure in different roles, which - due to their unique 'prosodic design' can be presented without any verbalized projection of upcoming reported speech, once they have been introduced. This is due to the 'referent-tracking' nature of some prosodic designs of reported utterances.

Quick links
A browser-friendly version of this article is not yet available. View PDF
Auer, P., E. Couper-Kuhlen & F. Mueller
(in print) Language in time. New York: Oxford University Press.
Auer, P. & A. Luzio
(eds.) (1992) The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bruenner, G.
(1991) Redewiedergabe in Gesprächen. Deutsche Sprache, 1–15.Google Scholar
Clark, H. & R. Gerrig
(1990) Quotations and demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E.
(1993) English speech rhythm: Form and function in everyday verbal interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
(1998) Coherent voicing: On prosody in conversational reported speech. In LiSt. Interaction and Linguistic Structures 1: 1–26. Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A.
(1986) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Günthner, S.
(1997a) The contextualization of affect in reported dialogues. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds.), The Language of emotions. Conceptualization, expression, and theoretical foundation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 247–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997b) Direkte und indirekte Rede in Alltagsgesprächen - zur Interaktion von Syntax und Prosodie in der Redewiedergabe. In P. Schlobinski (ed.), Zur Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997c) Stilisierungsverfahren in der Redewiedergabe - die ‘Überlagerung von Stimmen’ als Mittel der moralischen Verurteilung in Vorwurfsrekonstruktionen. In B. Sandig & M. Selting (eds.), Sprech-und Gesprächsstile. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J.
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W.E.
(1990) Referential practice. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Holt, E.
(1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on language and social interaction 29.3: 219–245. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Leech, G.N. & M.H. Short
(1981) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mayes, P.
(1990) Quotation in spoken English. Studies in Language 12–2: 325–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. & D. Lange
(1991) The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66: 227–279. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Ruehmann, M.
(1999) Reported speech, ‘voicing’, and ‘pre-voicing’: Typification strategies in everyday conversation. M.A. thesis. Dept. of Linguistics, University of Konstanz.
Selting, M., P. Auer
et al. (1998) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem (GAT). Linguistische Berichte 173:91-122.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1989) “Oh talking that is so sweet”: Constructing dialogue in conversation. In Talking voices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 98–133.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Yule, G.
(1995) The paralinguistics of reference: Representation in reported discourse. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (eds.), Principle & practice in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–196.Google Scholar
Jane Austen
: Pride and prejudice. New York: Dell Publishing 1959.Google Scholar