The major claims made here pertain to: (1) The dominant role of the Participants paremeter, where distinction is made between the "on-screen" and the "off-screen" casts, with the Interpreter acting as Mediator in two communicative channels; (2) The specificity of the TV product as a Polysemiotic Text, consisting of a variety of Language and Non-Language components, and the way it affects the Interpreter's performance; (3) The communicative goals of the two casts of Primary Participants and the strategies employed to attain them in a situation highly marked from a kinesthetic and proxemic point of view, which often leads to shifts in the Interpreter's output, and (4) The factors determining the choice of the optimum mode of Interpreting.
The growing role of television as a means of communication across national, cultural and linguistic frontiers is one of the characteristic features of the world towards the end of the 20th century. And what we can predict about its future is a significant increase in the number of television channels and the scope of television coverage of a larger variety of events, with the participation of people [ p. 330 ]speaking different languages in interactive TV programmes. All this will assign a still more prominent placè to TV Translation and Interpreting and set more responsible tasks before the mediators in this process—the translators and interpreters, without whom its felicitous realisation is unthinkable.
[ p. 354 ]References
1983 “Compression as a Means of Realisation of the Communicative Act in Simultaneous Interpretation”. Fremdsprachen 4. 233–238.
1994 “Types of Texts and Intertextuality in Simultaneous Interpreting”. Mary Snell-Hornby, ed. Translation Studies: An Interdiscipline. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1994 179–187.
1997a “A Typology of Interpreter-Mediated Events”. The Translator 3:2. 153–174.
1997b “Interpreting Mediated TV Events”. Kinga Klaudy and János Kohn, eds. Transferre Necesse Est: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Current Trends in Studies of Translation and Interpreting, 5-7 September, 1996, Budapest, Hungary. Budapest: Scholastica 1997 171–174.
1997c “The Polysemiotic Text in Multimedia Communication and Its Translation and Interpreting”. A paper given at the Multimedia Translation Conference, Rimini, Italy 1997 [ms.]
1998 “Consecutive Interpreting as a Decision Process”. Ann Beylard-Ozeroff, Jana Králová and Barbara Moser-Mercer, eds. Translators' Strategies and Creativity: Selected Papers from the 9th International Conference on Translation and Interpreting, Prague, September 1995, in honor of Jiří Levý and Anton Popovič. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1998 181–188.
1997 “Non-Cognitive Constraints and Interpreter Strategies in Political Interviews”. Karl Simms, ed. Translating Sensitive Texts: Linguistic Aspects. Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi 1997 113–131.
1986 “Shifts in Cohesion and Coherence in Translation”. Juliane House and Shoshana Blum-Kulka, eds. Interlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies. Tübingen: Gunter Narr 1986 17–35.
1978Teoria i praktika sinhronnovo perevoda [Theory and Practice of Simultaneous Interpreting]. Moskva: Mezhdunarodnie Otnoshenia.
1989 “Translation and Mass-Communication: Film and T.V. Translation as Evidence of Cultural Dynamics”. Babel 35:4. 193–218.
1989Simultaneous Interpretation as a Factor in Effecting Shifts in the Position of Texts on the Oral-Literate Continuum. Tel Aviv University. [Unpublished MA Thesis.]
[ p. 356 ]
1995 “Shifts in Cohesion in Simultaneous Interpreting”. The Translator 1:2. 193–214.
1988Translation Studies: An Integrated Approach. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
1997 “Quality of Media Interpreting—a Case Study”. Yves Gambier, Daniel Gile and Christopher Taylor, eds. Conference Interpreting: Current Trends in Research. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1997 194–197.