Discussion
Relative Stability and Stable Relativity

Kirsten Malmkjær
Middlesex University, London

Table of contents

While the general spirit of co-operation that has prompted and permeates this Forum article is certainly welcome, one or two rather worrying things are suggested by it (I know that they are not true; but appearances can be important). One is that we read hardly anything except ourselves, and that we don’t acknowledge what we do read: There are two references at the end of the article, one to each author; but none to Rosch, whose prototype notion is made use of (point 12). The other is that this (apparent) lack of serious scholarly application causes us to return to the same issues over and over, endlessly reinventing the wheel. It might be more helpful to make use of the wheels that already exist to propel ourselves forward; but to do that successfully, we must study the nature of these wheels, and it is not at all clear that we have done so.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

[ p. 345 ]References

Aijmer, Karin, Bengt Altenberg and Mats Johansson
eds. 1996Languages in Contrast: Papers from a Symposium on Text-Based Cross-Linguistic Studies, Lund 4–5 March 1994. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Peter and Jill Boucher
eds. 1998Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1974 “On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme”. Rep. from Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47 in Davidson 1984 : 183–198.Google Scholar
1984Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1986 “A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs”. R.E. Grandy and R. Warner, eds. Philosophical Grounds of Rationality: Intentions, Categories, Ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986 157–174.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. and Stephen C. Levinson
eds. 1996aRethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996b “Introduction: Linguistic Relativity Reexamined”. Gumperz and Levinson 1996a : 1–18.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig and Signe Oksefjell
eds. 1998Corpora and Cross-Linguistic Research: Theory, Method, and Case Studies. Amsterdam-Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten
1993 “Underpinning Translation Theory”. Target 5:2. 133–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
ed. 1999Translation and Norms. Clevedon etc.: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1986Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar