Discussion
Assumed translation: Reconciling Komissarov and Toury and moving a step forward

Sandra L. Halverson

Table of contents

In his Forum paper (1996), Vilen Komissarov takes up Toury’s notion of the “assumed translation” (e.g. 1995a and 1995b). Komissarov’s primary concern is with the delimitation of our object of study, and in dealing with this topic he suggests a two-part strategy: first, a new definition of translation and second, a revision of Toury’s idea.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Catford, J.C.
1965A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1999Contrastive functional analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Collins English dictionary
1979Glasgow: William Collins Sons & Co.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra
1998aConcepts and categories in Translation Studies. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation.]Google Scholar
1998b “Translation Studies and representative corpora: Establishing links between translation corpora, theoretical/descriptive categories and a conception of the object of study”. Meta 43:4. 494–514.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
[ p. 354 ]
1999 “Conceptual work and the ‘translation’ concept”. Target 11:1. 1–31.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Cognitive models, prototype effects and ‘translation’: The role of cognition in translation (meta)theory”. Across languages and cultures 3(1). 22–43.Google Scholar
House, Juliane
1981A model for translation quality assessment. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
1989 “Translation quality assessment”. Andrew Chesterman, ed. Readings in translation theory. Finland: Oy Finn Lectura Ab 1989 157–161.Google Scholar
Kade, Otto
1968Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädia.Google Scholar
Komissarov, Vilen
1996 “Assumed translation: Continuing the discussion”. Target 8:2. 365–374.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nord, Christiane
1997Translating as a purposeful activity. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary
1981Reason, truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
1995The construction of social reality. London/New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
1999Mind, language and society: Philosophy in the real world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995a “The notion of ‘assumed translation’: An invitation to a new dscussion”. Henri Bloemen, Erik Hertog and Winibert Segers, eds. Letterlijkheid Woordelijkheid/Literality Verbality. Antwerpen/Harmelen: Fantom 1995 135–147.Google Scholar
1995bDescriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar