A corpus-based study of the verb observar in English-Spanish translations of biomedical research articles

Ian A. Williams

Abstract

This paper describes an empirical contextual study of the English verbs and syntactic resources translated by observar in an extensive corpus of biomedical research articles. Quantitative analysis showed that the frequency of observar was significantly higher in the Spanish translations than in the comparable Spanish language original articles (360 vs. 162 instances; P < 0·001). Qualitative analysis of the Spanish native texts provided a linguistic profile for the verb. This profile was then used in a contextual study to assess the appropriateness of the 360 instances found in the translated texts. The results indicate that observar is only a natural translation equivalent for ‘observe’. For other verbs, an awareness both of the rhetorical, syntactic and collocational restrictions and of the range of alternative choices will allow translators to select appropriate lexical items and avoid excessive repetition of observar, thus creating a more varied target text.

Keywords
Table of contents

In the last decade, increasing use has been made of corpora for studying the phenomena of translation and translation behaviour. A number of analysts have indicated that a corpus-based approach is suitable for investigating what might be universals of translation (Baker 1995, 1996; Laviosa 2002). Simplification, explicitation and normalisation have been proposed as possible universals that could be tested for in corpora. Although large general translation corpora will throw light on these theoretical questions, the compilation of specialised corpora consisting of both a parallel component—i.e., pairs of source language (SL) and target language (TL) texts—and a comparable component—i.e., similar native language [ p. 86 ](NL) texts in the TL—can provide valuable quantitative data and qualitative information on specific registers and genres for trainee and practising translators in specialised fields (Williams 2004; 2006). With this corpus design, analysis of the NL texts establishes the TL norms and reference values for the linguistic variables under study, comparison of the SL and TL texts informs of the behaviour of practising translators, and comparison of the TL texts with the comparable NL texts brings out both typical and idiosyncratic features of the translation products.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Baker, Mona
1995 “Corpora in Translation Studies: An overview and some suggestions for future research”. Target 7:2. 223–243.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
1996 “Corpus-based Translation Studies: The challenges that lie ahead”. Harold Somers, ed. Terminology, LSP and Translation Studies in language engineering: In honour of Juan C. Sager. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins 1996 175–186.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Laviosa, Sara
2002Corpus-based Translation Studies: Theory, findings, applications. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Ian A.
1997 “Presentation-type structures in medical reports”. Miguel Ángel Vega and Rafael Martín-Gaitero, eds. La palabra vertida: Estudios en torno a la traducción. Madrid: Universidad Complutense 1997 491–500.Google Scholar
2004 “How to manage patients in English-Spanish translation: A target-oriented contrastive approach to Methods ”. Target 16:1. 69–103.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Towards a target-oriented model for quantitative contrastive analysis in Translation Studies: An exploratory study of theme–rheme structure in Spanish-English biomedical research articles”. Languages in contrast 6:1. 1–45.[ p. 103 ]Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
forthcoming. “A corpus-based study of Spanish translations of the verb ‘report’ in biomedical research articles”. To appear in Meta.