Outlining a new linguistic theory of translation

Massimiliano Morini
University of Udine—Italy
Abstract

In the following article, an outline of a new linguistic theory of translation is given that can be of use to theorists and practitioners alike. The linguistic theories of the 1950s and 1960s were too normative and a-contextual to account for all the forms and aspects of translation; while the ‘skeptical turn’ of Translation Studies has succeeded in unmasking the ideological quality of all theories, but cannot produce a ‘cybernetics’ of translation, an account of how translation is materially done. A new linguistic approach can produce such a practical account, provided that the pragmatic level of analysis is given a prominent role and that a touch of non-scientific skepticism is maintained.

Keywords:
Table of contents

In what follows, a practice-based, and pragmatically-oriented, linguistic theory of translation is proposed. Formulating a linguistic theory of translation is, on the face of it, as obvious an operation as writing an ichthyological description of fish: translations are linguistic objects, and all those who think about translation must inevitably do so in terms of language. Nevertheless, the recent history of Translation Studies has made such an apparently uncontroversial expression as ‘a linguistic theory of translation’ controversial, and, indeed, suspect. Therefore, a brief historical survey of the discipline is needed before a (new, practical, pragmatic) linguistic theory is outlined.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Ariosto, Ludovico
1584 Orlando Furioso di m. Lodouico Ariosto: nuouamente adornato di figure da Girolamo Porro padouano. Et di altre cose che saranno notate nella seguente facciata. Venice: Francesco de Franceschi senese e compagni.Google Scholar
Aston, Guy
1999 “Corpus use and learning to translate”. Textus 12:2. 289–313.Google Scholar
Austermühl, Frank
2001 Electronic tools for translators. Manchester-Northampton (MA): St Jerome.Google Scholar
Austin, J.L.
1962 How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent
1994 “Conversational impliciture”. Mind 9. 125–162.Google Scholar
[ p. 49 ]
Bassnett, Susan and André Lefevere
eds. 1990 Translation, history & culture. London-New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
de Beaugrande, R.-A. and W.U. Dressler
1981 Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertuccelli Papi, Marcella
2000 Implicitness in text and discourse. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
Bowker, Lynne
2002 Computer-aided translation technology: A practical introduction. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben A.
ed. 1959/1960 On translation. New York: Oxford University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934/1982 Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart-New York: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf
1938 “Foundations of logic and mathematics”. Otto Neurath, Rudolf Carnap and Charles W. Morris, eds. International encyclopedia of unified science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, I 1938 139–214.Google Scholar
Catford, John C.
1965 A linguistic theory of translation: An essay in applied linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew and Emma Wagner
2002 Can theory help translators?: A dialogue between the ivory tower and the wordface. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
2003 Dire quasi la stessa cosa: Esperienze di traduzione. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Eliot, T.S.
1919–1975 “Tradition and the individual talent”. Selected prose of T.S. Eliot. London: Faber and Faber 1919–1975 37–44.Google Scholar
Even-Zohar, Itamar
1978 “The position of translated literature within the literary polysystem”. Papers on poetics and semiotics 8. 21–27.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Peter
1998 “Presumption and translation”. Hickey 1998 . 115–123.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Alessandro
1980 “An extended theory of speech acts: Conditions for subordinate acts in sequences”. Journal of pragmatics 4. 233–252.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, L.G.
1932/2005 Canto del tramonto (Sunset song). Varese: Giano.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul
1967/1991 “Logic and conversation”. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.-London: Harvard University Press 1967/1991 22–57.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1985 An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harington, John
1591 Orlando Furioso in English heroical verse. London: R. Field.Google Scholar
Harris, Brian
1988 “Bi-tex: A new concept in translation theory”. Language monthly and international journal of translation 54. 8–10.Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil
1998 “Text politeness: A semiotic regime for a more interactive pragmatics”. Hickey 1998 . 72–102.Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo
1999 Translating in systems: Descriptive and system-oriented approaches explained. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Hervey, Sandor G.J.
1998 “Speech acts and illocutionary function in translation methodology”. Hickey 1998 . 10–24.Google Scholar
Hickey, Leo
ed. 1998 The pragmatics of translation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters,Google Scholar
1998a “Perlocutionary equivalence: Marking, exegesis and recontextualisation”. Hickey 1998 . 217–232.Google Scholar
Holmes, James S.
1971/1988 “The cross-temporal factor in verse translation”. Holmes 1988 . 34–44.Google Scholar
1972/1988 “The name and nature of Translation Studies”. Holmes 1988 . 67–80.Google Scholar
[ p. 50 ]
1988 Translated!: Papers on literary translation and Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi,Google Scholar
Ishiguro, Kazuo
1982 A pale view of hills. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1959/1966 “On linguistic aspects of translation”. Brower 1959/1966 . 232–239.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kade, Otto
1968 Zufall und Gesetzmässigkeit in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
Koller, Werner
1979 Einführung in die Übersetzungswissenschaft. Heidelberg: Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Landers, Clifford E.
2001 Literary translation: A practical guide. Clevedon-Buffalo-Toronto-Sydney: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laviosa, Sara
2002 Corpus-based Translation Studies: Theory, findings, applications. Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983 Principles of pragmatics. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Michael H. Short
1981/1983 Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. London-New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Lefevere, André
1975 Translating poetry: Seven strategies and a blueprint. Assen-Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malmkjær, Kirsten
1999 “Translation and linguistics: What does the future hold?”. Textus 12:2. 263–273.Google Scholar
Morini, Massimiliano
2002–2003 “Come traduciamo: il traduttore umile e il traduttore invisibile”. Quaderni dell’Associazione culturale Italia-Inghilterra 1. 23–34.Google Scholar
2005 “Translating Scottish poetry”. Babel A.F.I.A.L. 14. 5–21.Google Scholar
2006 Tudor translation in theory and practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
2007 La traduzione: Teorie. Strumenti. Pratiche. Milano: Sironi.Google Scholar
Neubert, Albrecht
1968/1981 “Pragmatische Aspekte der Übersetzung”. Wolfram Wilss, ed., Übersetzungswissenschaft. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1968/1981 60–75.Google Scholar
Newmark, Peter
1988 A textbook of translation. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene A.
1964 Toward a science of translating, with special reference to principles and procedures involved in Bible translating. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Oettinger, A.G.
1960 Automatic language translation: Lexical and technical aspects, with particular reference to Russian. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1959/1966 “Automatic (transference, translation, remittance, shunting)”. Brower 1959/1966 . 240–267.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osimo, Bruno
1998 Manuale del traduttore: Guida pratica con glossario. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar
Owens, Rachel
ed. 1996 The translator’s handbook. London: Aslib.Google Scholar
Pound, Ezra
1919/2000 “Guido’s relations”. Lawrence Venuti, ed. The Translation Studies reader. London-New York: Routledge 2000 27–33Google Scholar
Reiß, Katharina
1969 “Textbestimmung und Übersetzungsmethode”. Ruperto-Carola. Zeitschrift der Vereinigung der Freunde der Studentschaft der Üniversität Heidelberg 20:46. 69–75.Google Scholar
Reiß, Katharina and Hans J. Vermeer
1984/1991 Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
[ p. 51 ]
Robinson, Douglas
1997 Becoming a translator: An accelerated course. London-New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuelsson-Brown, Geoffrey
1993 A practical guide for translators. Clevedon-Philadelphia-Adelaide: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Snell-Hornby, Mary
1988 Translation Studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sofer, Morry
1996 The translator’s handbook. Rockville (MD): Schreiber Publishing.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford-Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoffrey and Susan Hunston
eds. 2000 Evaluation in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1995 Descriptive Translation Studies and beyond. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trujillo, Arturo
1999 Translation engines: Techniques for machine translation. London: Springer.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
1995 The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation. London: Routledge.   DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zacchi, Romana and Massimiliano Morini
eds. 2002 Manuale di traduzioni dall’inglese. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.Google Scholar