The Circumscribed Infinites Scheme (CIS): A deconstructive approach to translating poetry

Adolfo Martín García
Mar del Plata CAECE University, Argentina/Mar del Plata National University (UNMDP), Argentina

The purpose of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, it seeks to introduce and explain the CIS (Circumscribed Infinites Scheme), a deconstructive scheme for translating poetry; and, on the other, it aims at analyzing the scheme’s impact on the translation into English of a variety of poems by Jorge Luis Borges. Devised by the present author, who is also responsible for the translations analyzed, the CIS is a translational scheme whereby meaning is understood as an inexhaustible textual effect, and which, in its theoretical elucidation, seeks to raise the practicing translator’s awareness of the control he or she might have over the degree of infinite exegetic circumscription—and subsequent infinite exegetic recreation—during the translation process.

Table of contents

Let us overlook contingent metaphysical paradoxes and assume, at least for a finite moment, that infinites are cumulative, reckonable sets—keeping in mind that literary translation is a field that may engender infinite products. From a deconstructive standpoint, the number of ways in which a text can be rendered into a target language is incalculable. In fact, Deconstruction provides support for one of the truisms that have grown more deeply entrenched in the collective mind of translators worldwide, which claims that “there are (at least) as many versions of a translated text as translators translating it”.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.


Borges, Jorge Luis
1989Obras completas. Buenos Aires: Emecé.Google Scholar
Davis, Kathleen
2001Deconstruction and translation. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques
1967a/1974De la Grammatologie. Paris: Minuit; tr.Gayatry Chakravorty Spivakas Of grammatology. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
1967b/1978L’écriture et la différence. Paris Éditions de Seuil; tr. Alan Bass as Writing and difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1971/1974 “La mythologie blanche”. Poetique 5; tr. F.C.T Moore. as “White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy”. New literary history 6(1). 5–74.Google Scholar
1972a/1981La dissémination. Paris : Éditions du Seuil; tr. Barbara Johnson as Dissemination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1972b/1981Positions. Paris: Minuit; tr. Alan Bass as Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1972c/1982Marges de la Philosophie. Paris : Les Éditions de Minuit; tr. Alan Bass as Margins of philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 134 ]
1996/1998Le Monolinguisme de l’autre ou la prothèse d’origine. Paris: Galileé; tr. Patrick Mensah as Monolingualism of the Other; or, the prothesis of origin. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1992Los límites de la interpretación. Barcelona: Editorial Lumen S.A.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1985An introduction to functional grammar. Great Britain: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Venuti, Lawrence
2004The translator’s invisibility. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond
1958 “Moving from high culture to ordinary culture”. N. McKenzie, ed. Convictions. London: MacGibbon and Kee 1958.Google Scholar