Translating anglophobia: Tensions and paradoxes of biliterate performances in Singapore
Tong King Lee
The University of Hong Kong
This article examines problems arising from biliterate performances in English and Chinese in the context of the sociolinguistics of Singapore. The questions asked include: What are the ramifications of translating Chinese literature carrying anglophobic themes into English? How might translation displace anglophobic readings from Chinese literary works? What kind of identity discourse do self-translation practices engender? The article examines three cases of cross-linguistic practice as biliterate modalities in Singapore, with an eye on the identity discourse emanating from the translational space between English and Chinese in each case. In the first case, it is argued that the English translation of a Chinese poem with an anglophobic stance triggers an ironic self-reflexivity on the part of the target text reader and has the potential to exacerbate the cultural anxiety faced by the Chinese-speaking Self in the source text. The second case presents an example where the anglophobic interpretation of a Chinese play can potentially be ‘unread’ through the homogenization of code-switching through translation. In the final case of a self-translating playwright, it is found that English-Chinese and Chinese-English translations establish an asymmetric symbiosis whereby translation creates an interliminal space in which a hybrid identity discourse is negotiated. The three cases illustrate the tensions and paradoxes residing in the translational space between English and Chinese in Singapore, pointing to the problematic of interand cross-cultural communication in the multilingual state.
In March 2011, the Mingpao Monthly of Hong Kong and the Youth Book Company of Singapore jointly published a two-volume anthology of Singapore Chinese fiction written in the post-1980 era. In the introduction to the collection, the chief editor Xi Ni Er, also the incumbent President of the Singapore Writers’ Association, expounds on the prominent themes dealt with by the Chinese authors represented in the collection. These include “[a] persistence in [their] mother-culture, anxiety about education and language policy reform, a sense of loss over transformations in landscape and the resulting fading away of memories, a resonance with and concern about the vicissitudes of everyday life among the common folk” (Chen 2011, vii; my translation).
[ p. 250 ]References
1985/2004 “La traduction comme épreuve de l’étranger.” Texte 4: 67–81. Trans. Lawrence Venuti as “Translation and the Trials of the Foreign.” In The Translation Studies Reader (Second edn), ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 276–289. London: Routledge.
1994The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
Bokhorst-Heng, Wendy D.
1999Language Is More Than a Language. Singapore: Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore.
Booth, Wayne C.
1983The Rhetoric of Fiction (Second edn). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2005 “Literature as a World.” New Left Review 31: 71–90.
Chan, Leo T.H.
2010Readers, Reading and Reception of Translated Fiction in Chinese: Novel Encounters. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Xinjiapo dangdai huawen wenxue zuopin xuan. Xiaoshuo shang/ xia juan [An anthology of contemporary Singapore Chinese literature. Fiction; in 2 vols.]. Hong Kong and Singapore: Mingpao Monthly and Youth Book Company.
Dixon, L. Quentin
2009 “Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore: An Analysis of Its Sociohistorical Roots and Current Academic Outcomes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 8 (1): 25–47.
2006 “Refraction and Recognition: Literary Multilingualism in Translation.” Target 18 (1): 17–47.
2009 “Multilingualism.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies (Second edn), ed. by Mona Baker, and Gabriela Saldanha, 182–185. Abigdon: Routledge.
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
1997The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.
Ho, Elaine Y.L.
2010 “Chinese English, English Chinese: Biliteracy and Translation.” In Hong Kong Culture: Word and Image, ed. by Kam Louie, 55–73. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
2007The Bilingual Text: History and Theory of Literary Self-translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Kachru, Braj B.
1992 “Models in Non-native English.” In The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures (Second edn), ed. by Braj B. Kachru, 48–74. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Kuo, Pao Kun [Guo Bao Kun]
1995Bianyuan yixiang: Guobaokun xiju zuopinji (1983–1992) [Images at the margins: A collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s plays (1983–1992)]. Singapore: Shibao chubanshe.
Kuo, Pao Kun
2000Images at the Margins: A Collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s Plays. Singapore: Times Media.
Lee, Tong King
2009 “Asymmetry in Translating Heterolingualism: A Singapore Case Study.” Perspectives 17 (1): 63–75.
Lim, Lisa, and Joseph A. Foley
2004 “English in Singapore and Singapore English.” In Singapore English: A Grammatical Description, ed. by Lisa Lim, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2006 “Literary Heteroglossia in Translation: When the Language of Translation is the Locus of Ideological Struggle.” In Translation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, ed. by João F. Duarte, Alexandra A. Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 85–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
1998 “Bilingualism and Translation in/of Michèle Lalonde’s Speak White.” The Translator 4 (2): 229–247.
[ p. 251 ]
Ministry of Education, Singapore
2004Report of the Chinese Language Curriculum and Pedagogy Review Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
Ong, Keng Sen
2000 “Directing Lao Jiu: A Process of Excavation.” In Images at the Margins: A Collection of Kuo Pao Kun’s Plays, 306–315. Singapore: Times Media.
2002 “Reconceptualizing Chinese Identity: The Politics of Chineseness in Singapore.” In Ethnic Chinese in Singapore and Malaysia: A Dialogue Between Tradition and Modernity, ed. by Leo Suryadinata, 109–136. Singapore: Times Academic Press.