Pre- and post-conflict language designations and language policies: Re-configuration of professional norms amongst translators of the Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian languages

Jim Hlavac

Abstract

This paper examines the reported actions and strategies of translators working in three closely related languages, Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian, which have recently undergone re-codification in countries that have greatly changed their language planning and language policy regulations. The legacy of former and unofficial designations such as ‘Serbo-Croatian’ or ‘Bosnian-Croatian-Serbian’ within the post-conflict situation is contextualised and translators’ decisionmaking processes and reported strategies in relation to language form and designation are examined. The paper seeks to demonstrate the explanatory power of Toury’s notion of norms as a framework to account for new regularities of practice. Texts identified to be different from their nominal code, or market requests to work from or into unofficial designations are now problematised and re-negotiated as secondary practices or a less commonly reported behaviour. The paper extends and applies the notion of norms to the social and occupational, macro-pragmatic role that translators occupy.

Keywords:
Table of contents

This paper examines pre- and post-1991 language designations and language policies in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (hereafter: SFRY) and the successor states of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia respectively, and the re-negotiation of professional norms amongst translators of Bosnian, Croatian [ p. 239 ]and Serbian. The notion of norms (Toury 1978) is applied here to account for regularities of translation behaviour within a specific socio-cultural situation. Brief descriptions of the languages, their codification and the role of translation and translators in this are provided. Generalisations about language policy and translation practice up to 1991 are made which lead to a discussion on the role of conflict, declared (and perceived) nationality, linguistic separation and the ‘space’ that translators, working in re-codified languages, now occupy.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Apter, Emily
2001 “Balkan Babel: Translation Zones, Military Zones.” Public Culture 13 (1): 65–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Askew, Louise, and Myriam Salama-Carr
2011 “Interview: Interpreters in Conflict – the View from Within.” Translation Studies 4 (1): 103–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baibikov, Elena
2010 “Revised Translations, Revised Identities (Auto)biographical Contextualization of Translation.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 5 (1): 59–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brborić, Branislav
1999 “Das Serbische.” In Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik, ed. by Uwe Hinrichs, 339–382. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Brozović, Dalibor
1969Rječnik jezika ili jezik rječnika? Varijacija na temu varijanata. Posebno izdanje časopisa Kritika [A dictionary of languages or a language of dictionaries? Variations on the theme of variants. A special edition of the journal Kritika]. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Google Scholar
1991 “Serbo-Croatian as a Pluricentric Language.” In Pluricentric Languages. Different Norms in Different Nations, ed. by Michael Clyne, 347–390. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko
1995Jezik od mira do rata [Language from peace to war]. Beograd: Slovograf.Google Scholar
2012 “Language, Identity and Borders in the Former Serbo-Croatian Area.” Journal of Multicultural and Multilingual Development 33 (3): 219–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko, and Celia Hawkesworth
eds. 2004Language in the Former Yugoslav Lands. Bloomington, IN: Slavica.Google Scholar
Chesterman, Andrew
1993 “From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’: Translation Laws, Norms and Strategies.” Target 5 (1): 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael
1997Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Colic-Peisker, Val
2008Migration, Class and Transnational Identities: Croatians in Australia and America. Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cvetković-Sander, Ksenija
2011Sprachpolitik und nationale Identität im sozialistischen Jugoslawien (1945-1991): Serbokroatisch, Albanisch, Makedonisch und Slowenisch. Heidelberg: Harrasowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
[ p. 269 ]
Even-Zohar, Itamar
(1978) 2004 “The Position of Translated Literature Within the Literary Polysystem.” In The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd ed., ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 199–204. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
1990Polysystem Studies. Special issue of Poetics Today 11 (1). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, Katherine
2000 “Orientalism, the Balkans, and Balkan Historiography.” American Historical Review 105 (4): 1218–1233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Robert
2004Language and Identity in the Balkans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, Sven
2004 “Serbo-Croatian and its Successors in the Nordic Countries.” In Bugarski and Hawkesworth 2004, 251–258.Google Scholar
Hawkesworth, Celia
2004 “Serbo-Croatian and its Successors in British Universities.” In Bugarski and Hawkesworth 2004, 273–284.Google Scholar
Hlavac, Jim
2013 “Translation and Negotiation of Linguistic Varieties amongst Translators of the Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian Languages.” The International Journal for Translation and Interpreting Research 5 (2): 76–100.   CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy
2006 “Frameworks and Models in Language Policy and Planning.” In An Introduction to Language Policy, ed. by Thomas Ricento, 24–41. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jahn, Jens-Eberhard
1999 “New Croatian Language Planning and its Consequences for Language Attitudes and Linguistic Behavior – the Istrian Case.” Language & Communication 19: 329–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Francis R
2010 “Poetry Translation, Nationalism and Wars of the Yugoslav Transition.” The Translator 16 (2): 223–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Francis R., and Damir Arsenijević
2005 “(Re)constructing Bosnia: Ideologies and Agents in Poetry Translation.” In Translation and the Construction of Identity. IATIS Yearbook 2005, ed. by Juliane House, M. Rosaria Martín Ruano, and Nicole Baumgarten, 68–95. Seoul: IATIS.Google Scholar
Kapović, Mate
2009 “Položaj hrvatskoga jezika u svijetu danas” [The position of the Croatian language in the world today]. Kolo 9 (1-2): 24–28.Google Scholar
Katan, David
2009 “Occupation or Profession. A Survey of the Translators’ World.” Translation and Interpreting Studies 4 (2): 187–209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klaić, Bratoljub
1982Rječnik stranih riječi. Tuđice i posuđenice [A dictionary of foreign words: foreign- and loan-words]. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Matice hrvatske.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz
1974 “Die den internationalen Rang einer Sprache bestimmenden Faktoren. Ein Versuch.” Institut für deutsche Sprache. Forschungsberichte 20: 7–79.Google Scholar
1976 “Abstandsprachen und Ausbausprachen.” In Zur Theorie des Dialekts: Aufsätze aus 100 Jahren Forschung. Zeitschrift fur Dialektologie and Linguistik, Beiheft 16, ed. by Joachim Göschel, Norbert Nail, and Gaston van der Elst, 301–332. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Kordić, Snježana
2010Jezik i nacionalizam [Language and nationalism]. Zagreb: Durieux.Google Scholar
Kovačević, Miloš
1999У одбрану језика српскога – и даље [In defence of the Serbian language – and further to that]. Belgrade: Trebnik.Google Scholar
Kuhiwczak, Piotr
1999 “Translation and Language Games in the Balkans.” In Word, Text, Translation. Liber Amicorum for Peter Newmark, ed. by Gunilla Anderman and Margaret Rogers, 217–224. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Lefevere, André
1992Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
[ p. 270 ]
Levinger, Jasna
1993 “Jezik nacionalne identifikacije” [The language of national identification]. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku 36 (1): 93–98.Google Scholar
Longinović, Tomislav
2011 “Serbo-Croatian: Translating the Non-identical Twins.” In Topics in Translation: Translation and Opposition, ed. by Dimitris Asimakoulas and Margaret Rogers, 283–294. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magner, Thomas
1992 “Urban Vernaculars and the Standard Language in Yugoslavia.” In Language Planning in Yugoslavia, ed. by Ranko Bugarski and Celia Hawkesworth, 189–199. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Neweklowsky, Gerhard
2000 “Kulturelle und sprachliche Verflechtungen Bosniens und der Herzegovina.” Die Welt der Slawen 45: 1–26.Google Scholar
Nikčević, Vojislav
2009 “Crnogorski interdijalektni/naddijalektni (koine) standardni jezik” [The Montenegrin interdialectal/supradialectal (koine) standard language]. In Jezični varijeteti i nacionalni identiteti [Linguistic variants and national identities], ed. by Lada Badurina, Ivo Pranjković, and Josip Silić, 147–168. Zagreb: Disput.Google Scholar
Okuka, Miloš
1985 “Književnojezička situacija u Bosni i Hercegovini za vrijeme austrougarske uprave” [The situation of the literary language in Bosnia-Hercegovina under Austro-Hungarian administration]. Jugoslavenski seminar za strane slaviste 35: 53–63.Google Scholar
1998Eine Sprache. Viele Erben. Sprachpolitik als Nationalisierungsinstrument in Ex-Jugoslawien. Klagenfurt: Wieser Verlag.Google Scholar
Pavličević, Dragutin
1994Prof. dr. Miroslav Brandt uz 80. obljetnicu života 1914-1994” [A dedication to Prof. Brandt on the occasion of his 80th birthday]. Radovi Zavoda za hrvatsku povijest 27: 389–391.Google Scholar
Pongrašić, Zoran
2009Hi-Fi Fotelja. Zagreb: Knjiga u centru.Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony
2010Exploring Translation Theories. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radanović-Kocić, Vesna
1986 “Synonym Split in the Dialect of Bosnia and Hercegovina: A Study of a Change in Progress.” Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 16 (1): 123–131.Google Scholar
Radovanović, Milorad
1996Srpski jezik [The Serbian language]. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski – Instytut Filologii Polskiej.Google Scholar
2000 “From Serbo-Croatian to Serbian.” Multilingua 19 (1-2): 21–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundle, Christopher, and Kate Sturge
2010Translation under Fascism. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samardžija, Marko
1993Hrvatski jezik u Nezavisnoj Državi Hrvatskoj [The Croatian language in the Independent State of Croatia]. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty
2005 “Translating into English.” In Nation, Language, and the Ethics of Translation, ed. by Sandra Bermann and Michael Wood, 93–110. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stahuljak, Zrinka
2010 “Minor Empires. Translation, Conflict and Postcolonial Critique.” The Translator 16 (2): 255–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Škvorc, Boris
2005Australski Hrvati. Mitovi i stvarnost [Australian Croats. Myths and reality]. Zagreb: Hrvatska matica iseljenika.Google Scholar
Šojat, Antun
1983 “Zagrebačka Štokavština” [The Štokavski vernacular of Zagreb]. Rasprave zavoda za jezik 8-9: 253–264.Google Scholar
Thomas, Paul-Louis
1998 “Govori Niša i okolnih sela u sociolingvističkoj perspektivi” [The vernaculars of the city of Niš and surrounding villages with a sociolinguistic perspective]. Zbornik za filologiju i lingvistiku 38 (1): 185–192.Google Scholar
[ p. 271 ]
Thomson-Wohlgemuth, Gaby
2007 “On the Other Side of the Wall: Book Production, Censorship and Translation in East Germany.” In Modes of Censorship and Translation: National Contexts and Diverse Media, ed. by Francesca Billiani, 93–116. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Todorova, Maria
1997Imagining the Balkans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tolimir-Hölzl, Nataša
2009Bosnien und Herzegowina. Sprachliche Divergenz auf dem Prüfstand. Munich: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Toury, Gideon
1978 “The Nature and Role of Norms in Literary Translation.” In Literature and Translation: New Perspectives in Literary Studies, ed. by James S Holmes, José Lambert, and Raymond van den Broeck, 117–127. Leuven: ACCO.Google Scholar
(1995) 2004 “The Nature and Role of Norms in Translation.” In The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd ed., ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 205–218. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Revised ed. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turk, Marija, and Maja Opašić
2008 “Linguistic Borrowing and Purism in the Croatian language.” Suvremena lingvistika / Contemporary Linguistics 65: 73–88.Google Scholar
Tymoczko, Maria
2003 “Ideology and the Position of the Translator: In What Sense Is a Translator “In-between”?” In Apropos of Ideology – Translation Studies on Ideology – Ideologies in Translation Studies, ed. by Maria Calzada Pérez, 181–205. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
UNESCO
n.d. Index Translationum. http://​www​.unesco​.org​/xtrans​/bsform​.aspx​?lg​=0. Accessed 11 November 2013.
Venuti, Lawrence
2005 “Local Contingencies: Translation and National Identities.” In Nation, Language, and the Ethics of Translation, ed. by Sandra Bermann and Michael Wood, 177–202. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinay, Jean-Paul, and Jean Darbelnet
(1958) 1972Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais: méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar
Wachtel, Andrew
1998Making a Nation, Breaking a Nation. Literature and Cultural Politics in Yugoslavia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Michaela
2002 “Culture as Translation – and Beyond: Ethnographic Models of Representation in Translation Studies.” In Crosscultural Transgressions. Research Models in Translation Studies II: Historical and Ideological Issues, ed. by Theo Hermans, 180–192. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar
Youtube
2009Mustafa Cerić: “Naša majka je Turska!” [Mustafa Cerić, former Grand Mufti of Bosnia-Herzegovina, “Our mother is Turkey!”] https://​www​.youtube​.com​/watch​?v​=r​-gCPvGg3go. Accessed 3 January 2015.
Zauberga, Ieva
2000 “Rethinking Power Relations in Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures 1 (1): 49–56.Google Scholar
Žanić, Ivo
2009 “Titlovanje “Rana” – pokušaj načelnog pristupa” [The subtitling of ‘Rane’ / ‘Wounds’ – towards a principled approach]. In Jezični varijeteti i nacionalni identiteti [Linguistic variants and national identities], ed. by Lada Badurina, Ivo Pranjković, and Josip Silić, 457–472. Zagreb: Disput.Google Scholar
[ p. 272 ]