The multimodal approach in audiovisual translation

Christopher Taylor

Abstract

This paper will explore the multimodal approach to audiovisual translation (AVT). It must first be stressed, however, that most research on multimodality has not as yet focused on questions of translation. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (Jewitt 2009), which contains articles by most of the leading figures in the field, while representing a major step forward in multimodal studies, does not tackle translation head on. The word ‘translation’ does not even appear in the index. Over a relatively short time span, most of the major contributions to the field have been more purely linguistically based and intent on providing keys to the understanding of the interplay of semiotic resources such as words, images, gesture, music, light, etc. (see O’Toole 1994; Kress and van Leeuwen 1996; Martinec 2000; Unsworth 2001; Baldry and Thibault 2006, etc.). The work of these scholars, however, has provided an impetus to developing ideas on how to exploit multimodal analyses in the area of AVT. Thibault’s work, for example, on the ‘multimodal transcription’ provided this author with the basis for investigating how the integration of semiotic modalities in a film text could assist the subtitler in making those all-important decisions on what to retain and what to discard when faced with time constraints. Other scholars have studied the co-articulation of words and image in their discussion of how different modalities realize social functions and make meaning (O’Halloran 2008; Bednarek 2010), emphasising the importance of supplementing purely linguistic analyses with studies of all the other semiotic resources that make up a multimodal text. Findings will inevitably be reported verbally but the analyses need to explore the concept of integration and how other resources can interact with language and, crucially, how translators can be made sensitive to the entire semiotic impact of a multimodal text.

Keywords
Table of contents

Multimodality and multimodal texts have been described in the literature as, respectively, “the use of several semiotic modes in the design of a semiotic product or event” (Kress and Van Leeuwen 2001, 20) or “texts which combine and integrate the meaning-making resources of more than one semiotic modality – for example, language, gesture, movement, visual images, sound and so on – in order to produce a text-specific meaning” (Thibault 2000, 311). This is not a new field of study in that everything is to some extent multimodal, but in the modern world, archetypal multimodal texts such as films, television programmes and websites, have greatly broadened the scope of such studies. The concept of multimodality cuts across every discipline, and as every discipline can be subject to translation from one language to another, its importance in Translation Studies is now recognised.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

Baldry, Anthony
ed. 2000Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age. Campobasso: Palladino Editore.Google Scholar
2002 “Subtitling Dynamic Multimodal Texts: The Development of Interactive Self-access Tools.” In The Economy Principle in English: Linguistic, Literary and Cultural Perspectives, ed. by Giovanni Iamartino, Maria L. Bignami, and Carlo Pagetti, 54–62. Milan: Edizioni Unicopi.Google Scholar
2005A Multimodal Approach to Text Studies in English. Campobasso: Palladino Editore.Google Scholar
Baldry, Anthony, and Paul Thibault
2006Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bateman, John
2009 “Film and Representation: Making Filmic Meaning.” In Metarepresentation, Self-Organisation and Art, ed. by Wolfgang Wildgen, and Barend van Heusden, 137–162. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monica
2010The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bordwell, David
2008 “Three Dimensions of Film Narrative.” In Poetics of Cinema, 85–134. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruti, Silvia
2006 “Cross-cultural Pragmatics: The Translation of Implicit Compliments in Subtitles.” Jostrans 6: 185–197.Google Scholar
Burczynska, Paulina
2012Subtitling Humor. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Cattrysse, Patrick, and Yves Gambier
2008 “Screenwriting and Translating Screenplays.” In The Didactics of Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Jorge Díz-Cintas, 39–55 New York: Routledge. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1982 (2006) “Frame Semantics.” In Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, 373–400. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flynn, Gillian
2013Gone Girl. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
Fryer, Louise, and Jonathan Freeman
2012 “Presence in Those with and without Sight: Audio Description and its Potential for Visual Reality Applications.” Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation 5 (1): 15–23.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves
2006 “Multimodality and Audiovisual Translation.” In Audiovisual Translation Scenarios: Proceedings of the Marie Curie Euroconferences MuTra: Audiovisual Translation Scenarios, Copenhagen 1–5 May 2006, ed. by Mary Carroll, Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, and Sandra Nauert. http://​www​.euroconferences​.info​/proceedings​/2006​_Proceedings​/2006​_proceedings​.html. Accessed December 22, 2015.Google Scholar
2008 “Recent Developments and Challenges in Audiovisual Translation Research.” In Between Text and Image: Updating Research in Screen Translation, ed. by Delia Chiaro, Christine Heiss, and Chiara Bucaria, 11–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Moves towards Multimodality and Language Representation in Movies.” In Readings in Intersemiosis and Multimedia. Proceedings of the 3rd TICOM, Pavia, May 2006, ed. by Elena Montagna, 1–10. Pavia: Como.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Henrik
1992 “Subtitling: A New University Discipline.” In Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training Talent and Experience. Papers from the First Language International Conference, Elsinore, Denmark 1991, ed. by Cay Dollerup, and Anne Loddegaard, 161–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael
2002 “Phasal Analysis within Communication Linguistics: Two Contrastive Discourses.” In Relations and Functions within and around Language, ed. by Peter H. Fries, Michael Cumming, David Lockwood, and William Spruiell, 316–345. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ivarsson, Jan
1992Subtitling for the Media. A Handbook of an Art. Stockholm: Transedit.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
ed. 2009The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
1996Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001Multimodal Discourse: the Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Lomheim, Sylfest
1999 “The Writing on the Screen. Subtitling: A Case Study from Norwegian Broadcasting (NRK), Oslo.” In Word, Text, Translation, ed. by Gunilla Anderman, and Margaret Rogers, 190–207. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Karen
2010Phasal Analysis: Analysing Discourse through Communication Linguistics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martinec, Radan
2000 “Rhythm in Multimodal Texts.” LEONARDO 33 (4): 289–297.
Mazur, Iwona
2014 “Gestures and Facial Expressions in Audio Description.” In Audio Description: New Perspectives Illustrated, ed, by Anna Maszerowska, Anna Matamala, and Pilar Orero, 179–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Minsky, Marvin
1986The Society of Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay
2008Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Toole, Michael
1994The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Jan
2011Subtitling Norms for Television: An Exploration Focussing on Extralinguistic Cultural References. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Perego, Elisa
2009 “The Codification of Non-Verbal Information in Subtitled Texts.” In New Trends in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Jorge D. Cintas, 58–69. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Pettit, Zoe
2013 “Language and Image: Translating the Audiovisual Text in Subtitling and Dubbing.” In Readings in Intersemiosis and Multimedia. Proceedings of the 3rd TICOM, Pavia, May 2006, ed. by Elena Montagna, 213–232. Pavia: Como.Google Scholar
Ramière, Nathalie
2006 “Reaching a Foreign Audience: Cultural Transfers in Audiovisual Translation.” Jostrans 6: 152–166.Google Scholar
Remael, Aline
2008 “Screenwriting, Scripted and Unscripted Language: What do Subtitlers Need to Know?” In The Didactics of Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Jorge Díaz Cintas, 57–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Joel
2005 “Audio Description. The Visual made Verbal across Arts Disciplines across the Globe.” Translating Today 4: 15–17.Google Scholar
Taylor, Christopher
2003 “Multimodal Transcription in the Analysis, Translation and Subtitling of Italian Films.” The Translator 9 (2): 191–206. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Multimodal Text Analysis and Subtitling.” In Perspectives on Multimodality, ed. by Eija Ventola, Cassily Charles, and Martin Kaltenbacher, 153–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor Christopher
2013 “Multimodality and Audiovisual Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, ed. by Yves Gambier, and Luc van Doorslaer, vol. 4, 98–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Christopher
ed. Forthcoming (2016) A Text of Many Colours – Translating the Television Series ‘The West Wing’. Special issue of Intralinea 18.Google Scholar
Thibault, Paul
2000 “The Multimodal Transcription of a Television Advertisement: Theory and Practice.” In Baldry 2000, 311–385.Google Scholar
Unsworth, Len
2001Teaching Multiliteracies across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wilken, Nicole, and Jan-Louis Kruger
. Forthcoming (2016) “Putting the Audience in the Picture: Mise-en-shot and Psychological Immersion in Audio Described Film.” In Empirical Approaches to Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Elisa Perego, special issue of Across Languages and Cultures 17(2). Crossref logoGoogle Scholar