Action research: So much to account for

Josélia Neves

Abstract

In this article Action Research (AR) is addressed to determine its limitations and affordances as a research approach in audiovisual translation studies. A specific case of Participatory Action Research (PAR) is presented in the context of a Museum Project in Portugal – the MCCB project –, serving as a focus for the discussion of the main characteristics of AR: planning, putting into action, reflecting upon and starting anew, in spiralling continuums that start with the AR project itself but that go beyond it to spin off into new research and development projects.

Keywords
Table of contents

When, in 2009, Gambier addressed the “recent challenges in research on audiovisual translation” he ended his work by stating “it is time to train researchers beyond the traditional ‘textual’ paradigm” (Gambier 2009, 24) in what might be understood as a call for approaches that will account for more than products and the outcomes of translation practice. This closing statement might also be read as a demand for a better understanding of ‘the process,’ of ‘the agents’ and of ‘the systems’ involved in the numerous translation types that are now fitted under the “dynamic umbrella [of] audiovisual translation” (Orero 2004, vii). As posited by Cravo and Neves (2007), Action Research (AR) could be a valuable tool when researching into translation (in general), training translators or teachers of translation – and even more so when these are within audiovisual translation (AVT), given the complex multimodal, multimedial and multidisciplinary nature of the domain. Accounts of how AR served the purpose of getting a comprehensive understanding of an AVT type may be read in “‘There is Research and Research’: Subtitling for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing” (Neves 2007a) and “Subtitling Brazilian Telenovelas for Portuguese Deaf Audiences: An Action Research Project” (Neves 2007b). In that particular context, subtitling for the deaf and hard of hearing (SDH) was researched in the process of being introduced on Portuguese commercial television stations, subtitlers were trained for the purpose, deaf viewers were ‘led’ to appreciate the service, and all those involved were ‘empowered’ to continue their (individual and collective) learning processes once the project was over.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

References

ADLAB
2014Pictures Painted in Words. ADLAB Audio Description Guidelines. ADLAB Project. http://​www​.adlabproject​.eu/. Accessed December 22, 2015.
ANACED
2014A Arte Pertence a Todos. Manual de Boas Práticas Artísticas e Culturais. Lisboa: ANACED/INR.Google Scholar
Bogucki, Łukasz
2010 “The Applications of Action Research to Audiovisual Translation.” In Perspectives in Audiovisual Translation (Lódz Studies in Language 20), ed. by Łukasz Bogucki, and Krzysztof Kredens, 7-18. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Burns, Danny
2007Systemic Action Research: A Strategy for Whole System Change. Bristol: The Policy Press. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Cravo, Ana, and Josélia Neves
2007 “Using Action Research in Translation Studies.” Journal of Translation Studies 7. http://​www​.jostrans​.org​/issue07​/art​_cravo​.php. Accessed December 22, 2015.
Ferrance, Eileen
2000Action Research. Providence: Brown University.Google Scholar
Freire, Paulo
1970Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Gambier, Yves
2006 “Multimodality and Audiovisual Translation.” MuTra – Audiovisual Translation Scenarios: Conference Proceedings, 1–8. http://​euroconferences​.info​/proceedings​/2006​_Proceedings​/2006​_Gambier​_Yves​.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015.
2009 “Developments and Challenges in Audiovisual Translation Research.” In Translation Research Projects 2, ed. by Anthony Pym, and Alexander Perekrestenko, 17-25. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.Google Scholar
Greenwood, Davydd J., and Levin, Morten
1998Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Halverson, Sandra
2011 “Foreword.” In Methods and Strategies of Process Research. Integrative approaches in Translation Studies, ed. by Cecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild, and Elisabet Tiselius, xi-xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
ICOM
2012Informação ICOM.PT II (16) (March-May). http://​www​.icom​-portugal​.org​/multimedia​/info%20II​-16​_mar​-maio12​.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015.
Kemmis, Stephen
2001 “Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jürgen Habermas.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, ed. by Peter Reason, and Hilary Bradbury, 91-102. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kemmis, Stephen, and Robin McTaggart
2008 “Participatory Action Research. In Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, ed. by Norman Denzin, and Yvonna Lincoln, 251-330. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lima Devile, Eugénia, Ana Garcia, Filipe Carvalho, and Josélia Neves
2012 “Turismo Acessível em Portugal – Estudo de casos de boas práticas.” Revista Turismo and Desenvolvimento 17/18: 625-638.Google Scholar
Maguire, Patricia
2001 “Uneven Ground: Feminisms and Action Research.” In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, ed. by Peter Reason, and Hilary Bradbury, 59-69. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Maier, Carol
2007 “The Translator as an Intervenient Being.” In Translation as Intervention, ed. by Jeremy Munday, 1-17. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martins, Cláudia
2015Longe da Vista, Perto da Imaginação – análise de audioguias em museus portugueses. PhD diss. University of Aveiro.Google Scholar
Morse, Janice M., Michael Barrett, Maria Mayan, Karen Olson, and Jude Spiers
2002 “Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (2): 1-19. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Jeremy
ed. 2007Translation as Intervention. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Neves, Josélia
2007a “ ‘There is Research and Research’: Subtitling for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.” In Traducción y accesibilidad. La subtitulación para sordos y la audiodescripción para ciegos: nuevas modalidades de Traducción Audiovisual, ed. by Catalina Jimenez, 27-40. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2007b “Subtitling Brazilian Telenovelas for Portuguese Deaf Audiences: An Action Research Project.” In TRADTERM 13. Revista do Centro Interdepartamental de Tradução e Terminologia FFLCH/USP, ed. by Eliana Franco, and Vera Santiago, 121-134. São Paulo: Humanitas.Google Scholar
2010 “Soundpainting: Audio Description in Another Light.” Conference Catalogue of the 8th International Conference and Exhibition on Language Transfer in the Audiovisual Media – Languages and the Media. ICWE GmbH. Berlim 6–8 October, 43-45.Google Scholar
2011 “Museu da Comunidade Concelhia da Batalha.” Informação ICOM.PT II (13), 14-18. http://​www​.icom​-portugal​.org​/multimedia​/info%20II​-13​_jun​-ago11​.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015.
2012 “Inclusion and Accessibility in Action Research Unit. When Research Actively Works towards Change.” Design for All Institute of India 1–7 (8), 169-183.Google Scholar
2013 “Guias Eletrónicos em Contexto Museológico – uma Reflexão Crítica.” Ensino Em Re-Vista 20 (1): 163-178. http://​www​.seer​.ufu​.br​/index​.php​/emrevista​/article​/view​/23220​/12761.
Orero, Pilar
2004 “Audiovisual Translation: a New Dynamic Umbrella.” In Topics in Audiovisual Translation, ed. by Pilar Orero, vii-xiii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Reason, Peter, and Kate McArdle
2004 “Brief Notes on the Theory and Practice of Action Research.” In Understanding Research Methods for Social Policy and Practice, ed. by Saul Becker, and Alan Bryman, 114-122. London: The Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rocha, Natália
Acessibilidade nos Museus: um Caminho para a Inclusão Social. MA diss. University of Lisbon.
Stanley, Liz, and Sue Wise
1983Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stern, Thomas
2013 “What is Good Action Research? Reflections about Quality Criteria.” In Action Research, Innovation and Change. International Perspectives across Disciplines, ed. by Thomas Stern, Andrew Townsend, Franz Rauch, and Angela Schuster, 202-220. London: Routledge. Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Stringer, Ernest T.
2013Action Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Styles, Cath
2010 “Museum Experience Design: Lessons from Across the Field.” Concrete technology lecture notes. http://​catherinestyles​.files​.wordpress​.com​/2010​/07​/museum​-x​-design​.pdf. Accessed December 22, 2015.