Discussion
The Making of Culture Repertoire and the Role of Transfer

Itamar Even-Zohar

Table of contents

The purpose of this paper is to suggest a set of hypotheses for handling the relations between the processes and procedures involved with the making of repertoire on the one hand, and import and transfer on the other. Beyond the attempt itself, that is to draft links and interdependencies between these two phenomena, I am interested in drawing the attention of people interested in procedures and products of transfer, for example translation theory in its established sense, to the socio-cultural juncture where transfer plays a role. This role sometimes becomes a major one for the fate of societies and cultures; but even at times when it is a minor one, it is nonetheless present and indispensable. Therefore it deserves discussion in terms of culture research.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price. Direct PDF access to this article can be purchased through our e-platform.

[ p. 363 ]References

Even-Zohar, Itamar
1990Polysystem Studies. Durham: Duke University Press. [=Poetics Today 11:1.]Google Scholar
forthcoming. Papers in Polysystems of Culture.
Frykman, Jonas and Orvar Löfgren
1987Culture Builders: A Historical Anthropology of Middle-Class Life. tr. Alan Crozier. Foreword by John Gillis. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij
1978 "On the Semiotic Mechanism of Culture". New Literary History. IX: 2. 211-232.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar
Lotman, Jurij and Boris Uspenskij
1971 "O semioticheskom mexanizme kul'tury". Trudy po znakovym sistemam (Tartu) V. 144–166.Google Scholar
Segal, Dmitri
1974Aspects of Structuralism in Soviet Philology. Tel Aviv: The Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann
1986 "Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies". American Sociological Review 51 (April). 273-286.   Crossref logoGoogle Scholar