References

Aarons, Debra
1996 Topics and topicalization in American Sign Language. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 30, 65–106.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O., Roland Pfau & Ulrike Zeshan
2005 When a wh-word is not a wh-word: The case of Indian Sign Language. In: T. Bhattacharya (ed.), The Yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics 2005, 11–43. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Adam, Robert
2012 Language contact and borrowing. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language.An international handbook, 841–862. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adam, Robert, Eleni Orfanidou, James M. McQueen & Gary Morgan
2011 Sign language comprehension: Insights from misperceptions of different phonological parameters. In: R. Channon & H. van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 87–106. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahlgren, Inger
1990 Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In: S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol.1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2000 Classifiers. A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Akinlabi, Akinbiyi
1996 Featural affixation. Journal of Linguistics 32, 239–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibašić Ciciliani, Tamara & Ronnie B. Wilbur
2006 Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 9, 95–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allsop, Lorna, Bencie Woll & Rachel Sutton-Spence
1990 Sign language varieties in British television. A historical perspective. In: S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.), Current trends in European sign language research. Proceedings of the 3 rd European Congress on Sign Language Research , 61–72. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Anderson, Diane
2006 Lexical development of deaf children acquiring sign languages. In: B. Schick, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 135–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ann, Jean
1993 A linguistic investigation into the relation between physiology and handshape. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
1998 Contact between a sign language and a written language: Character signs in Taiwan Sign Language. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Pinky extension and eye gaze: Language use in Deaf communities, 59–99. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Antzakas, Klimis
2006 The use of negative head movements in Greek Sign Language. In: U. Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 258–269. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David F. & Sherman E. Wilcox
2007 The gestural origin of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler
2005 Morphological universals and the sign language type. Yearbook of Morphology 2004, 19–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler
2005 The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81, 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan D & Robert H. Logie
1999 Working memory: the multiple-component model. In: A. Miyake, & P. Shah (eds.), Models of working memory. Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control, 28–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahan, Ben, Judy Kegl, Robert G. Lee, Dawn MacLaughlin & Carol Neidle
2000 The licensing of null arguments in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Anne & Beppie van den Bogaerde
2006 Eyegaze in turn-taking in sign language interaction. Paper presented at Child Language Seminar, July 2006, Newcastle, UK.
2008 Codemixing in signs and words in input to and output from children. In: C. Plaza Pust & E. Morales Lopez (eds.), Sign bilingualism: Language development, interaction, and maintenance in sign language contact situations, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Communicative interaction. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 489–512. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 KODAs: A special form of bilingualism. In: D. Quinto-Pozos (ed.), Multilingual aspects of signed language communication and disorder, 211–234. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Baker, Anne, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Onno Crasborn
(eds.) 2003 Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Baker, Anne, Beppie van den Bogaerde & Bencie Woll
2005 Methods and procedures in sign language acquisition studies. Sign Language & Linguistics 8, 7–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Charlotte
1977 Regulators and turn-taking in ASL discourse. In: L.A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand. New perspectives on American Sign Language, 215–241. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Charlotte & Dennis Cokely
1980 American Sign Language. A teacher’s resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T.J. Publishers.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C
1988 Incorporation. A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Bank, Richard
2014 The ubiquity of mouthings in NGT. A corpus study. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen. Utrecht: LOT [http://​www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/376​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Battison, Robbin
1974 Phonological deletion in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 5, 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Baus, Cristina, Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut, Josep Quer & Manuel Carreiras
2008 Lexical access in Catalan Signed Language (LSC) production. Cognition 108, 856–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baus, Cristina, Manuel Carreiras & Karen Emmorey
2013 When does iconicity in sign language matter? Language and Cognitive Processes 28(3), 261–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelier, Daphne, Elissa L. Newport, Matt Hall, Ted Supalla & Mrim Boutla
2008 Ordered short-term memory differs in signers and speakers: Implications for models of short-term memory. Cognition 107, 433–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Becker, Claudia
2003 Verfahren der Lexikonerweiterung in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Benedicto, Elena & Diane Brentari
2004 Where did all the arguments go?: Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 743–810. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergman, Brita & Östen Dahl
1994 Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In: C. Bache, H. Basbøll & C.-E. Lindberg (eds.), Tense, aspect and action: Empirical and theoretical contributions to language typology, 397–422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Michelle & Sherry Hicks
(eds.) 2008 Hearing, father mother deaf. Hearing people in deaf families. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Susi Wurmbrand
2002 Notes on agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery 1(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogaerde, Beppie van den
2000 Input and interaction in deaf families. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/35​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Bonvillian, John D. & Raymond J. Folven
1993 Sign language acquisition: Developmental aspects. In: M. Marschark & M.D. Clark (eds.), Psychological perspectives on deafness, 229–268. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bonvillian, John D. & Theodore Siedlecki
2000 Young children’s acquisition of the formational aspects of American Sign Language. Parental report findings. Sign Language Studies 1, 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bos, Heleen F
1993 Agreement and prodrop in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: K. Hengeveld & F. Drijkoningen (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands, 37–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Pronoun copy in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: H. Bos & T. Schermer (eds.), Sign language research 1994: Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, 121–147. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Boudreault, Pierre & Rachel I. Mayberry
2006 Grammatical processing in American Sign Language: Age of first-language acquisition effects in relation to syntactic structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 21(5), 608–635. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny
1990 Acquisition of handshape in American Sign Language: A preliminary analysis. In: V. Volterra & C.J. Erting (eds.), From gesture to language in hearing and deaf children, 107–127. Berlin: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, Penny & Rachel Sutton-Spence
(eds.) 2001 The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Branchini, Chiara, Anna Cardinaletti, Carlo Cecchetto, Caterina Donati & Carlo Geraci
2013 wh-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2), 157–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branchini, Chiara & Caterina Donati
2009 Italian Sign Language relatives: A contribution to the typology of relativization strategies. In: A. Liptàk (ed.), Correlatives cross-linguistically, 157–191. Amsterdam: North Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Mary
1992 The visual world of British Sign Language: an introduction. In: D. Brien (ed.), Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
2001 Encoding and capturing productive morphology. Sign Language & Linguistics 4, 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Mary, Martin D. Colville, Lillian K. Lawson & Gerry Hughes
1984 Words in hand. A structural analysis of the signs of BSL. British Deaf Association.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane
1998 A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2001 Foreign vocabulary in sign languages. A cross-linguistic investigation of word formation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2010 Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Phonology. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 21–54. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane, Marie Coppola, Laura Mazzoni & Susan Goldin-Meadow
2012 When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gestureres, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30, 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, Diane & Laurinda Crossley
2002 Prosody on the hands and face: Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 5(2), 105–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brien, David
(ed.) 1992 Dictionary of British Sign Language/English. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Brien, David, Mary Brennan, Trude Schermer, Rita Harder & Robert Bakker
1995 Creating a sign language database: The SIGNBASE project. In: H. Bos & T. Schermer (eds.), Sign language research 1994. Proceedings of the Fourth European Congress on Sign Language Research, Munich, 339–346. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Brunelli, Michele
2011 Antisymmetry and sign languages: A comparison between NGT and LIS. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/284​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Cabeza Pereiro, Carmen & Ana Fernández Soneira
2004 The expression of time in Spanish Sign Language (SLE). Sign Language & Linguistics 7(1), 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Cindy
2001 The application of speech act theory to American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
Campbell, Ruth, Mairéad MacSweeney & Dafydd Waters
2008 Sign language and the brain: A review. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 13, 4–20.Google Scholar
Capek, Cheryl M., Giordana Grossi, Aaron J. Newman, Susan L. McBurney, David Corina, Brigitte Roeder & Helen J. Neville
2009 Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: Biological invariance and modality specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS) 106(21), 8784–8789.
Caponigro, Ivano & Kathryn Davidson
2011 Ask, and tell as well: Clausal question-answer pairs in ASL. Natural Language Semantics 19(4), 323–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Capovilla, Fernando C. & Walkiria D. Raphael
(eds.) 2001 Dicionário enciclopédico ilustrado trilingüe da Lingua de Sinais Brasileira. Vol. I. Sinais de A a L. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Carmel, Simon J
1982 International hand alphabet charts. Published by author.Google Scholar
Carroll, David W
2004 Psychology of language. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo.
2012 Sentence types. In: R. Pfau M. Steinbach & B. Woll, (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 292–315. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo Alessandra Checchetto, Carlo Geraci, Mirko Santoro & Sandro Zucchi
2015 The syntax of predicate ellipsis in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Lingua 166 214–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi
2006 Strategies of relativization in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24, 945–975. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah
2008 Views on word order in early ASL: Then and now. In: J. Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 293–315. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
2011 Sources of handshape error in first-time signers of ASL. In: D.J. Napoli & G. Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world. The impact of language, 96–121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Acquisition. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 647–686. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chen Pichler, Deborah & Helen Koulidobrova
In press. Acquisition of sign language as a second language. In: M. Marschark (ed.) The Oxford handbook of deaf studies: Research, policy, and practice Oxford Oxford University Press
Chen Pichler, Deborah, James Lee & Diane Lillo-Martin
2014 Language development in ASL-English bimodal bilinguals. In: D. Quinto-Pozos (ed.), Multilingual aspects of signed language communication and disorder, 235–260. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Clark, Eve V
2009 First language acquisition (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, Jennifer & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2001 Turn-taking patterns in Deaf conversation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5, 507–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coerts, Jane
1992 Nonmanual grammatical markers: An analysis of interrogatives, negations and topicalisations in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Conlin, Kimberley E., Gene R. Mirus, Claude Mauk & Richard P. Meier
2000 The acquisition of first signs: place, handshape, and movement. In: C. Chamberlain, J.P. Morford & R.I. Mayberry (eds.), Language acquisition by eye, 51–69. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Corina, David P
1990 Handshape assimilations in hierarchical phonological representation. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Sign language research. Theoretical issues, 27–49. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
1999 On the nature of left hemisphere specialization for signed language. Brain and Language 69, 230–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corina, David P. & Nicole Spotswood.
2012 Neurolinguistics. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll, (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 739–762. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy
2012 Pronouns. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 227–244. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costello, Brendan
2015 Language and modality: possible effects of the use of space on Spanish Sign Language (LSE). PhD dissertation, University of Vitoria (Spain) & University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey R
1979 American Sign Language typology. PhD dissertation, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno
2001 Phonetic implementation of phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/48​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
2012 Phonetics. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 4–20. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Els van der Kooij
1997 Relative orientation in sign language phonology. In: J. Coerts & H. de Hoop (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1997, 37–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Base joint configuration in Sign Language of the Netherlands: phonetic variation and phonological specification. In: J. van de Weijer, V.J. van Heuven & H. van der Hulst (eds.), The phonological spectrum. Volume 1: Segmental structure, 257–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The phonology of focus in Sign Language of the Netherlands. Journal of Linguistics 49(3), 515–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crasborn, Onno, Els van der Kooij, Dafydd Waters, Bencie Woll & Johanna Mesch
2008 Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 11(1), 45–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, Christian & Marie-Anne Sallandre
2007 Iconicity and arbitrariness in French Sign Language (LSF): Highly iconic structures, degenerated iconicity and diagrammatic iconicity. In: E. Pizzuto, P. Pietrandrea & R. Simone (eds.), Verbal and signed languages. Comparing structures, constructs, and methodologies, 13–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana
2008 Facial expression as intonation in Israeli Sign Language: the case of neutral and counterfactual conditionals. In: J. Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 61–82. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Dachkovsky, Svetlana & Wendy Sandler
2009 Visual intonation in the prosody of a sign language. Language and Speech 52 (2/3), 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Kathryn
2013 ‘And’ or ‘or’: General use coordination in ASL. Semantics & Pragmatics 6, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Weerdt, Kristof, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Katrien Van Mulders & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2004 Woordenboek Nederlands – Vlaamse Gebarentaal / Vlaamse Gebarentaal – Nederlands [http://​gebaren​.ugent​.be/].Google Scholar
Demey, Eline
2005 Fonologie van de Vlaamse Gebarentaal: Distinctiviteit & iconiciteit. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Deuchar, Margaret
1984 British Sign Language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Đình-Hoà, Nguyễn
1997 Vietnamese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dively, Valerie L
1998 Conversational repairs in ASL. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Pinky extension & eye gaze: Language use in deaf communities, 137–169. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Donati, Caterina, Gemma Barberà, Chiara Branchini, Carlo Cecchetto, Carlo Geraci & Josep Quer
In press. Searching for imperatives in European sign languages. In: S. Heinold & D. Van Olmen (eds.) Imperatives and other directive strategies Amsterdam John Benjamins
Duarte, Kyle
2010 The mechanics of fingerspelling: Analyzing Ethiopian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 11(1), 5–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dye, Matt W.G
2012 Processing. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 687–711. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul, Wallace V. Friesen & Joseph C. Hager
2002 Facial action coding system (FACS). Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen
2002 Language, cognition, and the brain. Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2007 The psycholinguistics of signed and spoken languages: how biology affects processing. In: M.G. Gaskell & G. Altman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, 703–722. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen, Helsa B. Borinstein, Robin Thompson & Tamar H. Gollan
2008 Bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 11(1), 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen & Margaret Wilson
2004 The puzzle of working memory for sign language, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 521–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
1995 Point of view expressed through shifters. In: K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 133–154. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
L’Epée, Charles Michel Abbé de
1784 La véritable manière d’instruire les sourds et muets. Paris: Nyon l’aîné.Google Scholar
Fernández Villabrille, Francisco
1851 Diccionario usual de mímica y dactilología: útil a los maestros de sordo-mudos, a sus padres y a todas las personas que tengan que entrar en comunicacíon con ellos. Madrid: Imprenta del Colegio de Sordo-mudos y Ciegos. (full text available at: www​.cervantesvirtual​.com​/nd​/ark:​/59851​/bmc154h5).Google Scholar
Ferreira Brito, Lucinda
1990 Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian Sign Language. In: S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol.1: Linguistics, 229–260. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan
1975 Influences on word order change in American Sign Language. In: C.N. Li (ed.), Word order and word order change, 3–25. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Bonnie Gough
1999[1972] Some unfinished thoughts on finish. Sign Language & Linguistics 2, 67–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foley, William A
1991 The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt
2001 A grammar of Lele. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy
1975 Arbitrariness and iconicity: historical change in American Sign Language. Language 51, 696–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frishberg, Nancy, Nini Hoiting & Dan I. Slobin
2012 Transcription. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 1045–1075. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folven, Raymond J. & John D. Bonvillian
1991 The transition from nonreferential to referential language in children acquiring American Sign Language. Developmental Psychology 27(5), 806–816. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria A
1971 The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language 47(1), 27–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988 Grammatical aspects of speech errors. In: F.J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. Vol.II: Linguistic theory: Extensions and implications, 117–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fundación CNSE
2003a Diccionario normativo de la Lengua de Signos Española. Madrid: Fundación CNSE.Google Scholar
2003b Glosario temático de la Lengua de Signos Española. Salud: Psicologia. Madrid: Fundación CNSE.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo
2005 Negation in LIS (Italian Sign Language). In: L. Bateman & C. Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), 217–229. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo & Valentina Aristodemo
2016 An in-depth tour into sentential complementation in Italian Sign Language. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & A. Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 95–150. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geraci, Carlo, Marta Gozzi, Costanza Papagno & Carlo Cecchetto
2008 How grammar can cope with limited short-term memory: Simultaneity and seriality in sign languages. Cognition 106, 780–804. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gijn, Ingeborg van
2004 The quest for syntactic dependency. Sentential complementation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/89​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Glück, Susanne, Daniela Happ, Jörg Keller, Gerald Koblitz, Helen Leuninger & Roland Pfau
1997 Zur phonologischen Beschreibung von Gebärden: Vergebärdler. Das Zeichen 40, 240–257.Google Scholar
Göksel, Aslı & Meltem Kelepir
2016 Observations on clausal complementation in Turkish Sign Language. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & A. Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 65–94. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, Susan
2003 The resilience of language. What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how all children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012 Homesign: gesture to language. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 601–625. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In: P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Studies in syntax and semantics III: Speech acts, 183–198. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Groce, Nora E
1985 Everyone here spoke sign language. Hereditary deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Groeber, Simone & Evelyne Pochon-Berger
2014 Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds. Journal of Pragmatics 65, 121–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, François
2010 Bilingual: life and reality. Boston: Harvard College. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosvald, Michael & David Corina
2012 The perceptibility of long-distance coarticulation in speech and sign: A study of English and American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1), 73–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grushkin, Donald A
1998 Linguistic aspects of metaphorical expressions of anger in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 1, 143–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez-Sigut, Eva, Brendan Costello, Cristina Baus & Manual Carreiras
Submitted. LSE-Sign: a lexical database for Spanish Sign Language. Behavior Research Methods.
Hall, Stephanie
1989 Train-gone-sorry: The etiquette of social conversations in American Sign Language. In: S. Wilcox (ed.), American Deaf culture. An anthology, 89–102. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Hanke, Thomas, Reiner Konrad & Arvid Schwarz
2001 GlossLexer: A multimedia lexical database for sign language dictionary compilation. Sign Language & Linguistics 4, 171–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Britta
2002 Bilingualism and the impact of sign language research on Deaf education. In: D.F. Armstrong, M.A. Karchmer & J.V. Van Cleve (eds.), The study of signed languages. Essays in honor of William C. Stokoe, 172–189. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Kathryn L
2011 ASL movement phonemes and allophones. In: R. Channon & H. van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign languages, 285–314. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happ, Daniela & Marc-Oliver Vorköper
2005 Einige Bemerkungen zur syntaktischen und morphologischen Repräsentation von Numerus in Deutscher Gebärdensprache. In: H. Leuninger & D. Happ (eds.), Gebärdensprachen: Struktur, Erwerb, Verwendung (Linguistische Berichte Special Issue 15), 87–110. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
2006 Deutsche Gebärdensprache. Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Frankfurt: Fachhochschulverlag.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002a On the evolution of grammatical forms. In: A. Wray (ed.), The transition to language. Studies in the evolution of language, 376–397. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002b World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, Bernadet
2004 An introduction to the grammar of Jordanian Sign Language. Salt (Jordan): Al-Balqa Applied University.Google Scholar
2008 Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/193​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Herreweghe, Mieke van
2002 Turn-taking mechanisms and active participation in meetings with deaf and hearing participants in Flanders. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Turntaking, fingerspelling and contact in signed languages, 73–106. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Annika
2007 The expression of modal meaning in German Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. In: P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 245–278. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010 The interaction of eye blinks and other prosodic cues in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 13(1), 3–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Markus Steinbach
2012 Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. In: I. Buchstaller & I. van Alphen (eds), Quotatives. Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives, 203–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, Gregory, Ursula Bellugi & Edward S. Klima
2001 Sign language in the brain. Scientific American, June 2001, 42–49.Google Scholar
Hohenberger, Annette, Daniela Happ & Helen Leuninger
2002 Modality-dependent aspects of sign language production: Evidence from slips of the hands and their repairs in German Sign Language. In: R.P. Meier, K.A. Cormier & D.G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 112–142. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hohenberger, Annette & Helen Leuninger
2012 Production. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 711–738. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elisabeth C. Traugott
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, Harry van der
1993 Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10, 209–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 The composition of handshapes. University of Trondheim Working Papers in Linguistics 23, 1–17.Google Scholar
1996 On the other hand. Lingua 98, 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunger, Barbara
2006 Noun/verb pairs in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS). Sign Language & Linguistics 9, 71–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Isenhath, John O
1990 The linguistics of American Sign Language. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Jantunen, Tommi
2007 On topic in Finnish Sign Language. Manuscript, University of Jyväskylä, Finland. [http://​users​.jyu​.fi​/~tojantun​/articles​/JAN​_topic​_ms​.pdf].Google Scholar
2013 Ellipsis in Finnish Sign Language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 36(3), 303–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry
2012 Lexicalization and grammaticalization. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 816–841. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, Terry, Barbara O’Shea & Barbara Shaffer
2001 The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1, 281–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Robert E., Scott K. Liddell & Carol J. Erting
1989 Unlocking the curriculum: Principles for achieving access in deaf education. Gallaudet Research Institute Working Paper 89–3. Gallaudet University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor
1989 Auslan dictionary: a dictionary of Australian Sign Language (Auslan). Adelaide: TAFE National Centre for Research and Development.Google Scholar
2001a The lexical database of Auslan (Australian Sign Language). Sign Language & Linguistics 4, 145–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b Nouns and verbs in Australian Sign Language: An open or shut case? Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 6(4), 235–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003a BSL, Auslan and NZSL: three signed languages or one? In: A. Baker, B. van den Bogaerde & O. Crasborn (eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives in sign language research. Selected papers from TISLR 2000, 47–69. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
2003b Language standardisation and signed language dictionaries. Sign Language Studies 3, 431–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Auslan Signbank. Sydney: Catalyst Communications & Training, Pty Ltd. [www​.auslan​.org​.au].Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam Schembri
1999 On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2, 115–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Australian Sign Language. An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Trevor, Myriam Vermeerbergen, Adam Schembri & Lorraine Lesson
2007 ‘Real data are messy’: Considering cross-linguistic analysis of constituent ordering in Auslan, VGT, and ISL. In: P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 163–205. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Karnopp, Lodenir
1999 Aquisição fonológica na língua brasileira de sinais: estudo longitudinal de uma crainça surda. PhD dissertation, Porto Alegre Pontifícia: Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
2002 Phonological acquisition in Brazilian Sign Language. In: G. Morgan & B. Woll (eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition, 29–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward L
1985 Relative clauses. In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 141–170 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy, Ann Senghas & Marie Coppola
1999 Creation through contact: sign language emergence and sign language change in Nicaragua. In: M. DeGraff (ed.), Language creation and language change: creolization, diachrony, and development, 179–237. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim
2009 Parts of speech in Russian Sign Language: the role of iconicity and economy. Sign Language & Linguistics 12, 161–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Word order in Russian Sign Language: An extended report. Linguistics in Amsterdam 5, 1–56 [www​.linguisticsinamsterdam​.nl/].Google Scholar
2014 Information structure in Russian Sign Language and Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. [http://​dare​.uva​.nl​/record​/1​/432175]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimmelman, Vadim & Roland Pfau
In press. Information structure in sign languages. In: C. Fery & S. Ishihara (eds.) The Oxford handbook on information structure Oxford Oxford University Press
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi
1979 The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der
2001 Weak drop in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: V. Dively, M. Metzger, S. Taub & A.M. Baer (eds.), Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, 27–42. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
2002 Phonological categories in Sign Language of the Netherlands. The role of phonetic implementation and iconicity. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/55​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
Kooij, Els van der, Onno Crasborn & Wim Emmerik
2006 Explaining prosodic body leans in Sign Language of the Netherlands: Pragmatics required. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 1598–1614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozak, L. Viola & Nozomi Tomita
2012 On selected phonological patterns in Saudi Arabian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 13(1), 56–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krausneker, Verena
2000 Sign languages and the minority language policy of the European Union. In: M. Metzger (ed.), Bilingualism and identity in deaf communities, 142–158. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
2001 Sign languages of Europe – future chances. In: L. Leeson (ed.), Looking forward: EUD in the 3rd millennium – the deaf citizen in the 21st century, 64–73. Coleford: McLean Publisher.Google Scholar
Ktejik, Mish
2013 Numeral incorporation in Japanese Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 13, 186–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubus, Okan
2014 Relative clause constructions in Turkish Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Kyle, Jim & Bencie Woll
1985 Sign language. The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson
1996 The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
1980 Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan
1984 When the mind hears: a history of the deaf. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lang, Harry G
2011 Perspectives on the history of deaf education. In: M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education (2nd edition), 7–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine & Carmel Grehan
2004 To the lexicon and beyond: The effect of gender on variation in Irish Sign Language. In: M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds.), To the lexicon and beyond. Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities, 39–73. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine & John I. Saeed
2012a Irish Sign Language. A cognitive linguistic account. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2012b Word order. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 245–265. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leuninger, Helen
1989 Neurolinguistik. Probleme, Paradigmen, Perspektiven. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
2001 Das Projekt RELEX: Ein ökumenisches Lexikon religiöser Gebärden. In: H. Leuninger & K. Wempe (eds.), Gebärdensprachlinguistik 2000: Theorie und Anwendung, 171–192. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Leuninger, Helen, Annette Hohenberger, Eva Waleschkowski, Elke Menges & Daniela Happ
2004 The impact of modality on language production: Evidence from slips of the tongue and hand. In: T. Pechmann & C. Habel (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 219–277. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1987 Chinese. In: B. Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 811–833. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K
1978 Nonmanual signals and relative clauses in American Sign Language. In: P. Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 59–90. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1980 American Sign Language syntax. Den Haag: Mouton.Google Scholar
1986 Head thrust in ASL conditional sentences. Sign Language Studies 52, 243–262.Google Scholar
1997 Numeral incorporating roots & non-incorporating prefixes in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 92, 201–225.Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. & Robert E. Johnson
1986 American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 445–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Amy M. & Rachel I. Mayberry
2015 Studying sign language acquisition. In: E. Orfanidou, B. Woll & G. Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 281–299. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin Diane
1986 Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 415–444. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane
1995 The point of view predicate in American Sign Language. In: K. Emmorey & J. Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 155–170. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2012 Utterance reports and constructed action. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 365–387. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Deborah Chen Pichler
2006 Acquisition of syntax in sign languages. In: B. Schick, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 231–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier
2011 On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37, 95–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Ronice M. de Quadros
2008 Focus constructions in American Sign Language and Lingua de Sinais Brasileira. In: J. Quer (ed.), Signs of the time. Selected papers from TISLR 8, 161–176. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn
1990 Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In: W.J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds.), Speech production and speech modeling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loon, Esther van, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
2014 The grammaticalization of gestures in sign languages. In: C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S.H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Tessendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2133–2149.Google Scholar
Lucas, Ceil
(ed.) 1989 The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1995 Sociolinguistics in Deaf communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
2003 The role of variation in lexicography. Sign Language Studies 3, 322–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Methodological issues in studying sign language variation. In L. Meurant, A. Sinte, M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds.), Sign language research, uses and practices: Crossing the views on theoretical and applied sign language linguistics, 285–307. Berlin & Nijmegen: De Gruyter Mouton & Ishara Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil & Robert Bayley
2010 Variation in American Sign Language. In: D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 451–476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley, Ruth Reed & Alyssa Wulf
2001a Lexical variation in African American and white signing. American Speech 76, 339–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil, Robert Bayley, Clayton Valli, Mary Rose & Alyssa Wulf
2001b Sociolinguistic variation. In: C. Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of sign languages, 61–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Ceil & Clayton Valli
1989 Language contact in the American Deaf community. In: C. Lucas (ed.), The sociolinguistics of the Deaf community, 11–40. San Diego: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luttgens, Kathryn, Helga Deutsch & Nancy Hamilton
1992 Kinesiology: scientific basis of human motion. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn
1997 The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
MacSweeney, Mairéad, Bencie Woll, Ruth Campbell, Philip K. McGuire, Anthony S. David, Steven C.R. Williams, John Suckling, Gemma A. Calvert & Michael J. Brammer
2002 Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. Brain 125(7), 1583–1593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Makharoblidze, Tamar
In press. Indirect object markers in Georgian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 18(2).
Malm, Amja
(ed.) 1998 Suomalaisen viitomakielen perussankirja. Helsinki: Libris Oy.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark
1977 Iconic devices in American Sign Language. In: L.A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 57–107. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Mark A
1979 Natural constraints in sign language phonology: data from anatomy. Sign Language Studies 24, 215–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsaja, I Gede
2008 Desa Kolok – A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
Marschark, Marc
2007 Raising and educating a deaf child (2nd edition). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marschark, Marc, Gladys Tang & Harry Knoors
2014 Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez, Liza B
1995 Turn taking and eye gaze in sign conversation between deaf Filipinos. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Sociolinguistics in deaf communities, 272–306. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Mather, Susan M
1987 Eye gaze and communication in a deaf classroom. Sign Language Studies 54, 11–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Classroom turn-taking mechanism: effective strategies for using eye gaze as a regulator. In: C. Erting (ed.), The deaf way: perspectives from the International Conference on Deaf Culture, 627–632. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann
2010 Verb agreement in sign language morphology. In: D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 173–224. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Verb agreement. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 136–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauk, Claude & Martha E. Tyrone
2012 Location in ASL: Insights from phonetic variation. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1), 128–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayberry, Rachel I
1993 First language acquisition after childhood differs from second language acquisition: The case of American Sign Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36, 1258–1270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McBurney, Susan
2002 Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In: R.P. Meier, K.A. Cormier & D.G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 329–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 History of sign languages and sign language linguistics. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 909–948. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCaskill, Carolyn, Ceil Lucas, Robert Bayley & Joseph Hill
2011 The hidden treasure of black ASL – its history and structure Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
McKee, David & Graeme Kennedy
2000 Lexical comparison of signs from American, Australian, British, and New Zealand Sign Languages. In: K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
McKee, Rachel L. & Sophia Wallingford
2011 ‘So, well, whatever’: Discourse functions of palm-up in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(2), 213–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P
1990 Person deixis in American Sign Language. In: S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol.1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2000 Shared motoric factors in the acquisition of sign and speech. In: K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 333–356. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2002 The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In: G. Morgan & B. Woll (eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition, 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, Richard P. & Diane Lillo-Martin
2013 The points of language. Humana.Mente – Journal of Philosophical Studies 24, 151–176.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit
1999 A perfect marker in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2, 43–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 413–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Iconicity and metaphor: Constraints on metaphorical extension of iconic forms. Language 86(4), 865–896.Google Scholar
2012 Word classes and word formation. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 77–112. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol Padden
2010a Sign languages and compounding. In: S. Scalise & I. Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
2008 A language in space. The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2010b Emerging sign languages. In: M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Volume 2, 267–280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, Michael
2000 Signing in the Seraglio: mutes, dwarfs and jestures at the Ottoman court 1500–1700. Disability & Society 15(1), 115–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mindess, Anna
2006 Reading between the signs: intercultural communication for sign language interpreters (2nd edition). Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
Minguet Soto, Amparo
(coordinator) 2001 Signolingüística: introducción a la linguistica de la LSE. Valencia: FESORD.Google Scholar
Morford, Jill P., Angus B. Grieve-Smith, James MacFarlane, Joshua Staley & Gabriel Waters
2008 Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language. Cognition 109, 41–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moores, Donald F
2010 The history of language and communication issues in deaf education. In: M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education. Volume 2, 17–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary
2006 The development of narrative skills in British Sign Language. In: B. Schick, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 314–343. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Gary, Sarah Barrett-Jones & Helen Stoneham
2007 The first signs of language: phonological development in British Sign Language. Applied Psycholinguistics 28, 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Hope E. & Rachel I. Mayberry
2012 Complexity in two-handed signs in Kenyan Sign Language: Evidence for sublexical structure in a young sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1), 147–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Even Hovdhaugen
1992 Samoan reference grammar. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Nadolske, Marie & Rachel Rosenstock
2007 Occurrence of mouthings in American Sign Language: A preliminary study. In: P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Comparative studies on sign language structure, 35–61. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2014 Order of the major constituents in sign languages: implications for all language. Frontiers in Psychology 5, Article 376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Institute of the Deaf
2011 South African Sign Language dictionary on DVD, (2011). Worcester, Western Cape, SA: National Institute of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Ben Bahan & Robert G. Lee
2000 The syntax of American Sign Language. Functional categories and hierarchical structure Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Newkirk, Don, Edward S. Klima, Carlene C. Pedersen & Ursula Bellugi
1980 Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In: V.A. Fromkin (ed.), Errors in linguistic perfomance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand, 165–197. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. & Richard P. Meier
1985 The acquisition of American Sign Language. In: D.I. Slobin (ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition, 881–933. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nonhebel, Annika
2002 Indirecte taalhandelingen in Nederlandse Gebarentaal. Een kwalitatieve studie naar de non-manuele markering van indirecte verzoeken in NGT. MA thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
1985 Complementation. In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 42–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyst, Victoria
2007 A descriptive analysis of Adomorobe Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/151​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
2012 Shared sign languages. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 552–574. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Susan
2014 Delineating derivation and compounding. In: R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 26–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ormel, Ellen, Daan Hermans, Harry Knoors & Ludo Verhoeven
2009 The role of sign phonology and iconicity during sign processing: the case of deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 14(4), 436–448. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Gerardo
2013 Acquisition of a signed phonological system by hearing adults: the role of sign structure and iconicity. PhD dissertation, University College London. Available at: http://​discovery​.ucl​.ac​.uk​/1416826/.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol A
1988 Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, So-One Hwang, Ryan Lepic, Sharon Seegers & Tory Sampson
2013 Patterned iconicity in sign language lexicons. Gesture 13(3), 287–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Young-Me
1997 Topikalisierung im Koreanischen: Eine Folge von Basisgenerierung oder Move-alpha? Frankfurter Linguistische Forschungen 21, 34–44.Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach
(eds.) 2007 Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, Pamela, Robin L. Thompson & Gabriella Vigliocco
2010 Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1:227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petitto, Laura A. & Paula F. Marentette
1991 Babbling in the manual mode: Evidence for the ontogeny of language. Science 251, 1493–1496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petronio, Karen
1993 Clause structure in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen & Diane Lillo-Martin
1997 WH-movement and the position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73, 18–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland
2002 Applying morphosyntactic and phonological readjustment rules in natural language negation. In: R.P. Meier, K.A. Cormier & D.G. Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 263–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The grammar of headshake: A typological perspective on German Sign Language negation. Linguistics in Amsterdam 2008(1), 37–74.Google Scholar
2011 A point well taken: On the typology and diachrony of pointing. In: D.J. Napoli & G. Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world. The impact of language, 144–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 Manual communication systems: evolution and variation. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 513–551. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 The grammaticalization of headshakes: From head movement to negative head. In: A.D.M. Smith, G. Trousdale & R. Waltereit (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research, 9–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Josep Quer
2007 On the syntax of negation and modals in Catalan Sign Language and German Sign Language. In: P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 129–161. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2003 Optimal reciprocals in German Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 6, 3–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Relative clauses in German Sign Language: Extraposition and reconstruction. In: L. Bateman & C. Ussery (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 35), Vol. 2, 507–521. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2006a Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag. [http://​opus​.kobv​.de​/ubp​/volltexte​/2006​/1088/].Google Scholar
2006b Pluralization in sign and in speech: A cross-modal typological study. Linguistic Typology 10, 135–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Grammaticalization in sign languages. In: H. Narrog & B. Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 683–695. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2016 Complex sentences in sign languages: Modality – typology – discourse. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & A. Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 1–35. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll
(eds.) 2012a Sign language. An international handbook (HSK – Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Tense, aspect, and modality. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 186–204. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pietrandrea, Paola
2002 Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 2(3), 296–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pizzuto Elena & Virginia Volterra
2000 Iconicity and transparancy in sign languages: A cross-linguistic cross-cultural view. In: K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: an anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 261–286. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Plaza Pust, Carolina
2012 Deaf education and bilingualism. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 949–979. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poizner, Howard & Judy Kegl
1992 Neural basis of language and motor behaviour: Perspectives from American Sign Language. Aphasiology 6, 219–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poizner, Howard, Edward S. Klima & Ursula Bellugi
1987 What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prentice, David John
1987 Malay (Indonesian and Malaysian). In: B. Comrie (ed.), The world’s major languages, 913–935. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Prillwitz, Siegmund, Regina Leven, Heiko Zienert, Thomas Hanke, Jan Henning, et al.
1989 HamNoSys version 2.0. Hamburg notation system for sign languages: an introductory guide. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice M. de
1999 Phrase structure in Brazilian Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Pontifíca Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice M. de, Deborah Chen Pichler, Diane Lillo-Martin, Carina Rebello Cruz, L. Viola Kozak, Jeffrey Levi Palmer, Aline Lemos Pizzio & Wanette Reynolds.
2015 Methods in bimodal bilingualism research: Experimental studies. In: E.. Orfanidou, B. Woll & G. Morgan (eds.), Research methods in sign language studies: A practical guide, 250–281. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quer, Josep
2005 Context shift and indexical variables in sign languages. In: E. Georgala & J. Howell (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory 15, 152–168. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, David
(ed.) 2014 Multilingual aspects of signed language communication and disorder. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rankin, Miako N.P
2013 Form, meaning, and focus in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian
2005 Event structure in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Reilly, Judy
2006 How faces come to serve grammar: The development of nonmanual morphology in American Sign Language. In: B. Schick, M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Advances in the sign language development of deaf children, 262–290. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richmond-Welty, E. Daylene & Patricia Siple
1999 Differentiating the use of gaze in bilingual-bimodal language acquisition: A comparison of two sets of twins with deaf parents. Journal of Child Language 26, 321–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rimor, Mordechai, Judy Kegl, Harlan Lane & Trude Schermer
1984 Natural phonetic processes underlie historical change and register variation in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 13, 97–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Russell S
2004 Beginning L2 production errors in ASL lexical phonology: A cognitive phonology model. Sign Language & Linguistics 7(1), 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudner, William A. & Rochelle Butowsky
1981 Signs used in the deaf gay community. Sign Language Studies 30, 36–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Oliver
1989 Seeing voices: A journey into the world of the deaf. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy
1993 Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 10, 337–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996a Representing handshapes. In: W.H. Edmondson & R.B. Wilbur (eds.), International review of sign linguistics, 115–158. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1996b Phonological features and feature classes: The case of movements in sign language. Lingua 98, 197–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 The medium and the message: Prosodic interpretation of linguistic content in Israeli Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2), 187–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Visual prosody. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir & Carol Padden
2011 The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(2), 503–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin
2006 Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff
2005 The emergence of grammar: systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(7), 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sapountzaki, Galini
2012 Agreement auxiliaries. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, Daisuke
2007 Comparing the lexicons of Japanese Sign Language and Taiwan Sign Language: A preliminary study focusing on the difference in the handshape parameter. In: D. Quinto-Pozos (ed.), Sign languages in contact, 123–150. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schauwers, Karen, Paul Govaerts & Steven Gillis
2005 Language acquisition in deaf children with a cochlear implant. In: P. Fletcher & J.F. Miller (ed.), Developmental theory and language disorders, 95–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam
2003 Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In: K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 3–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schembri, Adam, Kearsy Cormier, Trevor Johnston, David McKee, Rachel McKee & Bencie Woll
2010 Sociolinguistic variation in British, Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages. In: D. Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 476–498. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam & Trevor Johnston
2012 Sociolinguistic aspects of variation and change. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 788–816. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Trude
1990 In search of a language. Influences from spoken Dutch on Sign Language of the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2003 From variant to standard: An overview of the standardization process of the lexicon of Sign Language of the Netherlands (SLN) over two decades. Sign Language Studies 3, 469–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Lexical variation in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: M. van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds.), To the lexicon and beyond. Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities, 91–110. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Sign language lexicography. In: K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), 321–324. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Language planning. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 889–908. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Trude, David Brien & Mary Brennan
2001 Developing linguistic specifications for a sign language database: The development of SignBase. Sign Language & Linguistics 4, 253–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schermer, Trude, Jacobien Geuze, Corline Koolhof, Elly Meijer & Sarah Muller
2006 Standaard lexicon Nederlandse Gebarentaal, deel 1 en 2 (DVD-ROM). Bunnik: NGC.Google Scholar
Schermer, Trude, Rita Harder & Heleen Bos
1988 Handen uit de mouwen: Gebaren uit de Nederlandse Gebarentaal in kaart gebracht. Amsterdam: NSDSK/Dovenraad.Google Scholar
Schermer, Trude & Corline Koolhof
1990 The reality of time-lines: Aspects of tense in Sign Language of the Netherlands (SLN). In: S. Prillwitz & T. Vollhaber (eds.), Proceedings of the Forth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 295–305. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
(eds.) 2009 Van Dale basiswoordenboek Nederlandse Gebarentaal [Basic dictionary NGT]. Utrecht: Van Dale.Google Scholar
Schermer, Trude, Corline Koolhof, Sarah Muller & Richard Cokart
2014 Online gebarenwoordenboek [Online dictionary NGT]. Bunnik: Nederlands Gebarencentrum.Google Scholar
Schermer, Trude & Myriam Vermeerbergen
2004 Nederlandse Gebarentaal en Vlaamse Gebarentaal: zussen of verre nichtjes? Ons Erfdeel, Vlaams-Nederlands Cultureel Tijdschrift 47, 569–575.Google Scholar
Schick, Brenda S
1990 The effects of morphosyntactic structure on the acquisition of classifier predicates in ASL. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 358–374. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Schick, Brenda, Marc Marschark & Patricia E. Spencer
(eds.) 2006 Advances in the sign language development of deaf children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmaling, Constanze
2000 Maganar hannu: Language of the hands. A descriptive analysis of Hausa Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
Schuit, Joke
2013 Typological aspects of Inuit Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam [http://​dare​.uva​.nl​/record​/463559].Google Scholar
Schwager, Waldemar & Ulrike Zeshan
2008 Word classes in sign languages: criteria and classifications. Studies in Language 32, 509–545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senghas, Ann
1995 Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
2005 Language emergence: clues from a new Bedouin Sign Language. Current Biology 15(12), R463–R465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sexton, Amy L
1999 Grammaticalization in American Sign Language. Language Sciences 21, 105–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Barbara
2002 can’t: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3, 34–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siple, Patricia
1978 Visual constraints for sign language communication. Sign Language Studies 19, 95–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skliar, Carlos & Ronice M. de Quadros
2005 Bilingual deaf education in the south of Brazil. In: A.M. de Méjia (ed.), Bilingual education in South America, 35–47. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Smith, Wayne H
1990 Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In: S.D. Fischer & P. Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol.1: Linguistics, 211–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2005 Taiwan Sign Language research: an historical overview. Language and Linguistics 6(2), 187–215.Google Scholar
Spencer, Patricia E. & Marc Marschark
(eds.) 2006 Advances in the spoken language development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stamp, Rose, Adam Schembri, Jordan Fenlon, Ramas Rentelis, Bencie Woll & Kearsy Cormier
2014 Lexical variation and change in British Sign Language. PLoS ONE 9(4), e94053. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steinbach, Markus & Roland Pfau
2007 Grammaticalization of auxiliaries in sign languages. In: P. Perniss, R. Pfau & M. Steinbach (eds.), Visible variation: Cross-linguistic studies on sign language structure, 303–339. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C
1960 Sign language structure. An outline of the visual communication system of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics Occasional Papers 8. Buffalo: University of Buffalo Press [Re-issued 2005, Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 10, 3–37].Google Scholar
Stokoe William C
1970 Sign language diglossia. Studies in Linguistics 21, 27–41.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Dorothy C. Casterline & Carl G. Cronenberg
1965 A dictionary of American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher
2012 Interpreting. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 980–998. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroombergen, Marianne & Trude Schermer
1988 KOMVA Notatiesysteem voor Nederlandse gebaren. Amsterdam: NSDSK.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted
1986 The classifier system in American Sign Language. In: Craig, C. (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, Ted & Elissa L. Newport
1978 How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In: P. Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Bencie Woll
1999 The linguistics of British Sign Language. An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Takkinen, Ritva
1994 Sign articulation of a deaf boy at the age of 2–3 years, 6 years and 8 years In: I. Ahlgren, B. Bergman & M. Brennan (eds.), Perspectives on sign language usage. Papers from the Fifth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 357–368. Durham: ISLA.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys
2006 Questions and negation in Hong Kong Sign Language. In: U. Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 198–224. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2007 Hong Kong Sign Language. A trilingual dictionary with linguistic descriptions. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Gladys & Prudence Lau
2012 Coordination and subordination. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 340–365. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taşçı, Süleyman S
2013 Hand reversal and assimilation in TİD lexicalized fingerspelling. In: E. Arık (ed.), Current directions in Turkish Sign Language research, 71–100. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Taub, Sarah F
2001 Language from the body. Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Iconicity and metaphor. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 388–412. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tellings, Agnes
1995 The two hundred years’ war in deaf education. A reconstruction of the methods controversy. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Thompson, Henry
1977 The lack of subordination in American Sign Language. In: L.A. Friedman (ed.), On the other hand: New perspectives on American Sign Language, 181–195. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Robin, Karen Emmorey & Tamar H. Gollan
2005 “Tip of the fingers” experiences by deaf signers. Psychological Science 16(11), 856–860. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Robert E. Longacre
1985 Adverbial clauses. In: T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. II: Complex constructions, 171–234. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thoutenhoofd, Ernst
2006 Cochlear implanted pupils in Scottish schools: 4-year school attainment data (2000–2004). The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11, 171–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, Martha E. & Claude Mauk
2010 Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38, 317–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valli, Clayton
(ed.) 2005 The Gallaudet dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Valli, Clayton & Ceil Lucas
1992/1995 Linguistics of American Sign Language: An introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vallverdú, Rosa
2001 The sign language communities. In: M.T. Turell (ed.), Multilingualism in Spain: Sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic aspects of linguistic minority groups, 183–214. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Vanhecke, Eline & Kristof De Weerdt
2004 Regional variation in Flemish Sign Language. In: M. Van Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (eds.), To the lexicon and beyond. Sociolinguistics in European Deaf communities, 27–38. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Vercellotti, Mary Lou & David R. Mortensen
2012 A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: an evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework. Morphology 22, 545–579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vermeerbergen, Myriam, Mieke Van Herreweghe, Philemon Akach & Emily Matabane
2007 Constituent order in Flemish Sign Language (VGT) and South African Sign Language (SASL). A cross-linguistic study. Sign Language & Linguistics 10, 25–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinson, David P., Kearsy Cormier, Tanya Denmark, Adam Schembri & Gabriella Vigliocco
2008 The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods 40(4), 1079–1087. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivolin-Karén, Riitta & Kaisa Alanne
2003 Draft curriculum and the structure of Finnish Sign Language. The Finnish Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar
Vos, Connie de & Roland Pfau
2015 Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 1, 265–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, Elizabeth A. & J. Bruce Tomblin
2014 The influence of communication mode on language development in children with cochlear implants. In: M. Marschark, G. Tang & H. Knoors (eds.), Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education, 134–151. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallin, Lars
1983 Compounds in Swedish Sign Language. In: J. Kyle & B. Woll (eds.), Language in sign, 56–68. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Waters, Dafydd & Rachel Sutton-Spence
2005 Connectives in British Sign Language. Deaf Worlds 21, 1–29.Google Scholar
Wauters, Loes & Annet de Klerk
2014 Improving reading instruction to deaf and hard-of-hearing students. In: M. Marschark, G. Tang & H. Knoors (eds.), Bilingualism and bilingual deaf education, 242–271. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitebread, Geoff
2014 A review of stuttering in signed languages. In: D. Quinto-Pozos (ed.), Multilingual aspects of sign language communication and disorder, 143–161. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B
1990 Metaphors in American Sign Language and English. In: W.H. Edmondson & F. Karlsson (eds.), SLR ’87: Papers from the Fourth International Symposium on Sign Language Research, 163–170. Hamburg: Signum.Google Scholar
1996 Evidence for the function and structure of wh-clefts in American Sign Language. In: W.H. Edmondson & R.B. Wilbur (eds.), International review of sign linguistics, 209–256. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2012 Information structure. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 462–489. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 The point of agreement: Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement. Sign Language & Linguistics 16(2), 221–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Preference for clause order in complex sentences with adverbial clauses in American Sign Language. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & A. Herrmann (eds.), A matter of complexity: Subordination in sign languages, 36–64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Cynthia G. Patschke
1998 Body leans and the marking of contrast in American Sign Language. Journal of Pragmatics 30, 275–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Brenda S. Schick
1987 The effects of linguistic stress on ASL signs. Language and Speech 30(4), 301–323.Google Scholar
Wilcox, Phyllis P
2000 Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2005  Metaphor in signed languages . Special issue of Sign Language Studies 5(3).Google Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman
2004 Gesture and language. Cross-linguistic and historical data from signed languages. Gesture 4(1), 43–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis Wilcox
1995 The gestural expression of modality in ASL. In: J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Margaret & Karen Emmorey
1997 Working memory for sign language: A window into the architecture of the working memory system. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 2(3), 121–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woll, Bencie
1987 Historical and comparative aspects of British Sign Language. In: J. Kyle (ed.), Sign and school: Using signs in deaf children’s development, 12–34. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
2012a Atypical signing. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 762–787. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Second language acquisition of sign language. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013 The history of sign language linguistics. In: K. Allan (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of linguistics, 91–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woll, Bencie & Paddy Ladd
2003 Deaf communities. In: M. Marschark & P.E. Spencer (eds.), Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education, 151–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James
1973a Language continuum: A different point of view. Sign Language Studies 2, 81–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1973b Some characteristics of Pidgin Sign English. Sign Language Studies 3, 39–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Sign languages and sign language families in Thailand and Viet Nam. In: K. Emmorey & H. Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 23–47. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Woolfe, Tyron, Rosalind Herman, Penny Roy & Bencie Woll
2010, Early vocabulary development in deaf native signers: a British Sign Language adaptation of the communicative development inventories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51(3), 322–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, Owen, et al.
(eds.) 1990 The Thai Sign Language dictionary (Revised and expanded edition). Bangkok: NAD in Thailand (NADT).Google Scholar
Yau, Shun-Chiu
1977 The Chinese signs: Lexicon of the standard sign language for the deaf in China. Paris: Ed. Lang. Croisés.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2000 Sign language in Indo-Pakistan. A description of a signed language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003a ‘Classificatory’ constructions in Indo-Pakistani Sign Language: Grammaticalization and lexicalization processes. In: K. Emmorey (ed.), Perspectives on classifier constructions in sign languages, 113–141. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003b Indo-Pakistani Sign Language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies 3(2), 157–212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8, 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b Interrogative constructions in signed languages: cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80, 7–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2006a Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
2006b Negative and interrogative structures in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). In: U. Zeshan (ed.), Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages, 128–164. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Google Scholar
2008 Roots, leaves and branches – The typology of sign languages. In: R.M. de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 671–695. Petrópolis (Brazil): Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar
Zimmer, June & Cynthia Patschke
1990 A class of determiners in ASL. In: C. Lucas (ed.), Sign language research: theoretical issues, 201–210. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Zucchi, Sandro
2009 Along the time line: Tense and time adverbs in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language Semantics 17, 99–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge
2003 Classifiying hand configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht. Utrecht: LOT [www​.lotpublications​.nl​/Documents​/78​_fulltext​.pdf].Google Scholar
2012 Classifiers. In: R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds.), Sign language. An international handbook, 158–186. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge & Ingeborg van Gijn
2006 Agreement phenomena in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: P. Ackema, et al. (eds.), Arguments and agreement, 195–229. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge & Sibylla Nijhof
1999 Pluralization in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In: J. Don & T. Sanders (eds.), OTS Yearbook 1998–1999, 58–78. Utrecht: UiL OTS.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge, Pamela Perniss & Aslı Özyürek
2012 An empirical investigation of expression of multiple entities in Turkish Sign Language (TİD): Considering the effects of modality. Lingua 122, 1636–1667. DOI logoGoogle Scholar