Sequence
Table of contents
In conversation, actions are not arranged serially, one-after-the-other, like so many marching penguins but rather come grouped together in various ways. An answer, for instance, responds to a question and the two form together a paired unit. Some of the ways in which actions are grouped together and related to one another so as to form sequences are discussed in what follows. This leads to a consideration of the distinctive way in which understanding is achieved and sustained in conversation. It also leads to an examination of “preference” – a set of biases which operate across a wide range of sequence types.
References
Clift, R.
2005 Discovering Order. Lingua 115: 1641– 1665 DOI: 
Davidson, J.
Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action 102 128 Cambridge University Press
Drew, P.
1981 Adults’ Corrections of Children’s Mistakes. In P. French & M. Maclure (eds.) Adult-Child Conversations: 244–267. Croom Helm.
1984 Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press BoP
1985 Analyzing the Use of Language in Courtroom Interaction. In T.A. Dijk (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol. 3: 133–148. Academic Press.
Drew, P. & E. Holt
1988 Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints. Social Problems 35(4): 398–417.
Ehrlich, S. & J. Sidnell
2006 ’I think that’s not an assumption you ought to make’: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society 35(5): 655–676.
Goodwin, C. & M.H. Goodwin
1987 Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 1–52.
Goodwin, C. & J. Heritage
Heritage, J.
1984 Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
2005 Cognition in discourse. In H. Te Molder & J. Potter (eds.) Conversation and Congnition: 184–202. Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. & G. Raymond
2005 The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1): 15–38.
Heritage, J. & S. Sefi
1992 Dilemmas of Advice: Aspects of the Delivery and Reception of Advice in Interactions Between Health Visitors and First Time Mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: 359–417. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Jefferson, G.
1988 On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418–441.
Kitzinger, C.
2000 Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology 10(2): 163–193.
Lerner, G.
2004 Collaborative turn sequences. In G. Lerner (ed.) Conversation analysis : studies from the first generation: 225–256. John Benjamins.
Levinson, S.C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
1992 Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: 66–100. Cambridge University Press.
2006 On the human “interactional engine”. In N.J. Enfield & S.C. Levinson (eds.) Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Berg.
Maynard, D.
1991 Interaction and institutional assymetry in clinical discourse. American Journal of Sociology 97(2): 448–495.
1992 On clinicians co-implicating recipients’ perspective in the delivery of diagnostic news. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: 331–358. Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A.
1978 Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction: 79–112. Academic Press. BoP
BoP
1984a Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis: 57–101. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1984b Pursuing a Response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986 Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims. Human Studies 9: 219–229.
Quirk, R.
Raymond, G.
2000 The Structure of Responding: Type-conforming and noncornforming responses to yes/no type interrogatives. UCLA: Unpublished dissertation.
2003 Grammar and social organization: Yes/No interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review 68: 939–967.
Sacks, H.
1975 Everyone Has to Lie. In M. Sanches & B.G. Blount (eds.) Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use: 57–80. Academic Press. BoP
1987[1973] On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.) Talk and Social Organisation: 54–69. Multilingual Matters. BoP
1995[1971] Spouse Talk. In G. Jefferson (ed.) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2: 437–443. Blackwell.
1995[1965] Rules of conversational sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 3–11. Blackwell.
1995[1966] An introduction sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.) Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 281–291. Blackwell.
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735. BoP
BoPSchegloff, E.A.
1972 Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place. In D. Sudnow (ed.) Studies in Social Interaction: 75–119. Free Press. BoP
1979 Identification and Recognition in Telephone Openings. In G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: 23–78. Erlbaum. BoP
1984 On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.) Structures of Social Action: 28–52. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986 The Routine as Achievement. Human Studies 9 (2/3): 111–151.
1988a Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (eds.) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order: 89–135. Polity Press.
1988b Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (1): 55–62.
1992 Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided for place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1295– 1345.
1995 Introduction. In G. Jefferson (ed.) Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation I: ix–lxii. Blackwell.
1996 Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 161–216.
2002 Reflections on Research on Telephone Conversation: Issues of Cross-Cultural Scope and Scholarly Exchange, Interactional Import and Consequences. In K.K. Luke & T.-S. Pavlidou (eds.) Telephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure Across Languages and Cultures: 249–281. John Benjamins.
2005 On complainability. Social Problems 52(4): 449–476.
2006 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPSchegloff, E.A. & H. Sacks
Sidnell, J.
2004 There’s risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse and Society 15(6): 745–766. BoP
BoP
forthcoming) The design and positioning of questions in Inquiry testimony. In S. Ehrlich & A. Freed (eds.) “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse Oxford University Press
Siverman, D., R. Bor, R. Miller & R. Goldman
1992 ’Obviously the advice is then to keep to safer sex’: Advice giving and advice reception in AIDS counselling. In P. Aggleton, P. Davies & G. Hart (eds.) AIDS: Rights, Risk and Reason: 174–191. Falmer Press.
Stivers, T.
2001 Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters. Journal of Communication 51(2): 1–31.
2002 ’Symptoms only’ and ’Candidate diagnoses’: Presenting the Problem in Pediatric Encounters. Health Communication 14(3): 299–338.
Stivers, T. & J.D. Robinson
Terasaki, A.K.
2004[1976] Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation: 171–223. John Benjamins.
Wootton, A.