Sequence
Table of contents
In conversation, actions are not arranged serially, one after the other, like so many marching penguins but rather come grouped together in various ways. An answer, for instance, responds to a question and the two form together a paired unit. Some of the ways in which actions are grouped together and related to one another so as to form sequences are discussed in what follows. This leads to a consideration of the distinctive way in which understanding is achieved and sustained in conversation. It also leads to an examination of “preference” – a set of biases which operate across a wide range of sequence types.
References
Davidson, J.
1984 Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 102–128. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Drew, P.
1984 Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ehrlich, S. & J. Sidnell
Goodwin, C. & M.H. Goodwin
Goodwin, C. & J. Heritage
Jefferson, G.
Lerner, G.
2004 Collaborative turn sequences. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation: 225–256. John Benjamins.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pomerantz, A.
1978 Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction: 79–112. Academic Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
1984 Pursuing a Response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, R.
Sacks, H.
1975 Everyone Has to Lie. In M. Sanches & B.G. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use: 57–80. Academic Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
1987 [1973] On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation: 54–69. Multilingual Matters. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, E.A.
1972 Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction: 75–119. Free Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
1979 Identification and Recognition in Telephone Openings. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: 23–78. Erlbaum. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
1984 On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 28–52. Cambridge University Press. BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
2002 Reflections on Research on Telephone Conversation: Issues of Cross-Cultural Scope and Scholarly Exchange, Interactional Import and Consequences. In K.K. Luke & T.-S. Pavlidou (eds.), Telephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure Across Languages and Cultures: 249–281. John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, E.A. & H. Sacks
Sidnell, J.
2004 There’s risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse and Society 15(6): 745–766.
BoP![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Terasaki, A.K.
Wootton, A.