In conversation, actions are not arranged serially, one after the other, like so many marching penguins but rather come grouped together in various ways. An answer, for instance, responds to a question and the two form together a paired unit. Some of the ways in which actions are grouped together and related to one another so as to form sequences are discussed in what follows. This leads to a consideration of the distinctive way in which understanding is achieved and sustained in conversation. It also leads to an examination of “preference” – a set of biases which operate across a wide range of sequence types.
1984Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals. BoP
1984Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 102–128. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1981Adults’ Corrections of Children’s Mistakes. In P. French & M. Maclure (eds.), Adult-Child Conversations: 244–267. Croom Helm.
1984Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Ehrlich, S. & J. Sidnell
2006‘I think that’s not an assumption you ought to make’: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society 35(5): 655–676.
Goodwin, C. & M.H. Goodwin
1987Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 1–52.
Goodwin, C. & J. Heritage
1990Conversation Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 283–307. BoP
1984Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
1988On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418–441.
2000Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology 10(2): 163–193.
2004Collaborative turn sequences. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation: 225–256. John Benjamins. BoP
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
2006On the human “interactional engine”. In N.J. Enfield & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Berg.
1978Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction: 79–112. Academic Press. BoP
1984Pursuing a Response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims. Human Studies 9: 219–229.
1985A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman. BoP
1975Everyone Has to Lie. In M. Sanches & B.G. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use: 57–80. Academic Press. BoP
1987  On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation: 54–69. Multilingual Matters. BoP
1995Lectures on Conversation ( 2 vols.). Blackwell. BoP
1995  Spouse Talk. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2: 437–443. Blackwell.
1995  Rules of conversational sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 3–11. Blackwell.
1995  An introduction sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 281–291. Blackwell.
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
1974A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735. BoP
1968Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075–1095. BoP
1972Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction: 75–119. Free Press. BoP
1979Identification and Recognition in Telephone Openings. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: 23–78. Erlbaum. BoP
1984On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 28–52. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986The Routine as Achievement. Human Studies 9(2/3): 111–151.
1988Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12(1): 55–62.
1992Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided for place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1295–1345.
1995Introduction. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation I: ix–lxii. Blackwell.
1996Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 161–216.
2002Reflections on Research on Telephone Conversation: Issues of Cross-Cultural Scope and Scholarly Exchange, Interactional Import and Consequences. In K.K. Luke & T.-S. Pavlidou (eds.), Telephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure Across Languages and Cultures: 249–281. John Benjamins.
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Schegloff, E.A. & H. Sacks
1973Opening up closings. Semiotica 8(4): 289–327. BoP
2004There’s risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse and Society 15(6): 745–766. BoP
forthcoming. The design and positioning of questions in Inquiry testimony. In S. Ehrlich & A. Freed (eds.) “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional DiscourseOxford University Press
2004  Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation: 171–223. John Benjamins.
1997Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge University Press. BoP