In conversation, actions are not arranged serially, one after the other, like so many marching penguins but rather come grouped together in various ways. An answer, for instance, responds to a question and the two form together a paired unit. Some of the ways in which actions are grouped together and related to one another so as to form sequences are discussed in what follows. This leads to a consideration of the distinctive way in which understanding is achieved and sustained in conversation. It also leads to an examination of “preference” – a set of biases which operate across a wide range of sequence types.
References
Davidson, J.
1984 Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 102–128. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Drew, P.
1981 Adults’ Corrections of Children’s Mistakes. In P. French & M. Maclure (eds.), Adult-Child Conversations: 244–267. Croom Helm.
1984 Speakers’ Reportings in Invitation Sequences. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP
Ehrlich, S. & J. Sidnell
2006 ‘I think that’s not an assumption you ought to make’: Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society 35(5): 655–676. 
Goodwin, C. & M.H. Goodwin
1987 Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1(1): 1–52.
Goodwin, C. & J. Heritage
Heritage, J.
1984 Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
Jefferson, G.
1988 On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418–441.
Kitzinger, C.
2000 Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology 10(2): 163–193.
Lerner, G.
2004 Collaborative turn sequences. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation: 225–256. John Benjamins. BoP
BoPLevinson, S.C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
2006 On the human “interactional engine”. In N.J. Enfield & S.C. Levinson (eds.), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Berg.
Pomerantz, A.
1978 Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction: 79–112. Academic Press. BoP
BoP
1984 Pursuing a Response. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 152–164. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986 Extreme Case Formulations: A Way of Legitimizing Claims. Human Studies 9: 219–229.
Quirk, R.
Sacks, H.
1975 Everyone Has to Lie. In M. Sanches & B.G. Blount (eds.), Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use: 57–80. Academic Press. BoP
1987 [1973] On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (eds.), Talk and Social Organisation: 54–69. Multilingual Matters. BoP
1995 [1971] Spouse Talk. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 2: 437–443. Blackwell.
1995 [1965] Rules of conversational sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 3–11. Blackwell.
1995 [1966] An introduction sequence. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Lectures on Conversation, vol. 1: 281–291. Blackwell.
Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff & G. Jefferson
1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735. BoP
BoPSchegloff, E.A.
1972 Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place. In D. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction: 75–119. Free Press. BoP
1979 Identification and Recognition in Telephone Openings. In G. Psathas (ed.), Everyday Language: 23–78. Erlbaum. BoP
1984 On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: 28–52. Cambridge University Press. BoP
1986 The Routine as Achievement. Human Studies 9(2/3): 111–151.
1988 Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12(1): 55–62.
1992 Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided for place for the defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology 95(5): 1295–1345.
1995 Introduction. In G. Jefferson (ed.), Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation I: ix–lxii. Blackwell.
1996 Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology 104(1): 161–216.
2002 Reflections on Research on Telephone Conversation: Issues of Cross-Cultural Scope and Scholarly Exchange, Interactional Import and Consequences. In K.K. Luke & T.-S. Pavlidou (eds.), Telephone Calls: Unity and Diversity in Conversational Structure Across Languages and Cultures: 249–281. John Benjamins.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge University Press. BoP
BoPSchegloff, E.A. & H. Sacks
Sidnell, J.
2004 There’s risks in everything: Extreme case formulations and accountability in inquiry testimony. Discourse and Society 15(6): 745–766. BoP
BoP
forthcoming. The design and positioning of questions in Inquiry testimony. In S. Ehrlich & A. Freed (eds.) “Why Do You Ask?”: The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse Oxford University Press
Terasaki, A.K.
2004 [1976] Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In G. Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation: 171–223. John Benjamins.
Wootton, A.