Text comprehension

Una Dirks
Table of contents

Text comprehension is a very complex process, which is involved whenever we deal with texts. It shares many overlaps with reading comprehension; both cover cognitive, social and cultural competencies. Comprehension skills have been acknowledged as core competencies for being able to acquire knowledge, develop other skills and one’s identity as well as for taking part in the reproduction and further development of society (cf. OECD 2009: 23f). Due to the high impact of comprehension skills on the individual’s needs and sociocultural demands, there is a long tradition of specific educational programs designed to enhance these skills. In addition, issues concerning text comprehension have been and still are a major concern of different disciplines, particularly cognitive science, linguistics and psychology (e.g. psycholinguistics, cognitive linguistics, computer linguistics/artificial intelligence, sociolinguistics). Moreover, sociocultural theories originating from social sciences and cultural studies have contributed to research on text (and reading) comprehension. In line with discipline — specific epistemologies, differing approaches to text fall either under the cognitive or cultural turn.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Afflerbach, Peter P. and Byeong-Young Cho
2011“The classroom assessment of reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 486–514. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Afflerbach, Peter P., Byeong-Young Cho and Jong-Yun Kim
2011“The assessment of higher order thinking in reading.” In Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills, ed. by Gregory Schraw and Daniel H. Robinson, 185–218. Denver, CO: Information Age.Google Scholar
Ahearn, Laura
2010“Agency and language.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Patricia A.
1998“The nature of disciplinary and domain learning: The knowledge, interest, and strategic dimensions of learning from subject matter text.” In Learning from Text across Conceptual Domains, ed. by Cynthia R. Hynd, 263–286. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Alexander, Patricia A., Daniel L. Dinsmore, Emily Fox, Emily Grossnickle, Sandra M. Loughlin, Liliana Maggioni, Meghan M. Parkinson and Fielding I. Winters
2011“Higher-order thinking and knowledge: Domain-general and domain-specific trends and future directions.” In Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills, ed. by Gregory Schraw and Daniel R. Robinson, 47–88. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Alexander, Patricia A. and Emily Fox
2011“Adolescents as readers.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 157–176. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alexander, Patricia A., Christopher T. Buehl, Helenrose Fives and Shuhu Chiu
2004“Modeling domain learning: Profiles from the field of special education.Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 545–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American College Testing
2006Reading between the Lines: What the ACT Reveals about College Readiness for Reading. [URL: http://​act​.org​/path​/policy​/reports​/reading​.html, access 11/16/2012]Google Scholar
Anderson, Richard C.
1977“The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference.” In Schooling and the Acquisitioning of Knowledge, ed. by Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Spiro and William E. Montague, 415–432. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Anderson, Richard C. and P. David Pearson
1984“A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension.” In Handbook of Reading Research, ed. by P. David Pearson, Rebecca Barr, Michael L. Kamil and Peter Mosenthal, 255–291. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight
2011“A Sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. How mind, body, and world work together in learning additional languages.” In Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Dwight Atkinson, 143–166. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. Michail
1981The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Austin Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Michail M.
1986Speech genres and other late essays, edited by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Austin Press.Google Scholar
Bazerman, Charles
2004“Intertextuality: How texts rely on other texts.” In What Writing Does and How It Does It: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, ed. by Charles Bazerman and Paul Prior, 83–96. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol, Vijay K. Bhatia and Maurizio Gotti
2012Insights into Academic Genres. Frankfurt/M.: Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernhardt, Elizabeth B.
2000“Second language reading as a case study of reading scholarship in the 20th century.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. 3, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal and P. David Pearson, 113–134. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2005“Progress and procrastination in second language reading.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 25: 133–150. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2011Understanding Advanced Second-Language Reading. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blass, Regina
1990Relevance Relations in Discourse. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bleich, David.
1988The Double Perspective: Language, Literacy, and Social Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bount, Ben G.
1995“Anthropological Linguistics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brantmeier, Cindy.
2006“The effects of language of assessment and L2 reading Performance on Advanced Reader’s Recall.” The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal 6(1): 1–17.Google Scholar
Brooks, Greg
2011Adult Literacy (age 18 and beyond). In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 177–196. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, John, Allan Collins and Pauö Duguid
1989“Situated cognition of learning.” Educational Researcher 18: 32–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian and George Yule
1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, Wolfram
1998“Cohesion and Coherence.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Cain, Kate, Jane V. Oakhill and Peter Bryant
2004“Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96(1): 31–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Kelly B.
2009“The role of cognitive flexibility in reading comprehension.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 114–139. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clarke, Mark A.
1980“The short circuit hypothesis of ESL-Reading.The Modern Language Journal 64(2): 203–09.Google Scholar
Coiro, Julie
2003“Exploring literacy on the Internet.” The Reading Teacher 56: 458–464.Google Scholar
Collins, Allan, John S. Brown and Kathy Larkin
1980“Inference in text understanding.” In Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, ed. by Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce and William F. Brewer, 385–407. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dansereau, Donald F.
1985“Learning strategy research.” In Thinking and Learning Skills: Relating Instruction to Research (Vol. 1), ed. by S.C. Judith Segal, Susan F. Chipman and Robert Glaser, 209–239. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dijk, Teun Van
1997“The study of discourse.” In Discourse as Structure and Process, ed. by Teun A. Van Dijk, 1–34. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dillon, Deborah R., David G. O’brien, Mistilina Sato and Catherine M. Kelly
2011“Professional development and teacher education for reading instruction.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 629–660. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dirks, Una
2012“Lesekompetenzen diagnostizieren im Englischstudium: Inferenzen verstehen und erklären [Assessment of reading competencies in English Studies: Interpreting and explaining inferences].” In Professionalisierung und Diagnosekompetenz – Kompetenzentwicklung und -förderung im Lehramtsstudium [Professional Development and Diagnostic Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Education], Online-Volume, ed. by Wilfried Hansmann, Una Dirks and Hendrik Baumbach, Ch. V. 3, 13 pages. Marburg: Philipps-University [URL: http://​archiv​.ub​.uni​-marburg​.de​/opus​/schriftenreihen​_ebene2​.php​?sr​_id​=30​&la​=de].Google Scholar
2013a “Pädagogisch-soziologische Diagnosekompetenz im Modell [A model of pedagogical sociological competencies of diagnostics].” In Hansmann et al., 115–136.Google Scholar
2013b “ Prä- und Posttest-Kongruenzen. Gemeinsamkeiten und Differenzen in der Anforderungsstruktur der Fallvignetten [Pre- and post-test congruences. Similarities and differences in the structure of case vignettes].” In Hansmann et al., 191–234.Google Scholar
Dirks, Una.
2013c “Eine Kritik der Lese-/Testkonstrukte in PISA, DESI und TEDS-LT aus sozialtheoretischer Perspektive [A critique of reading/assessment constructs in PISA, DESI and TEDS-LT from a socio-theoretical perspective].” In Hansmann et al., 39–63.Google Scholar
Duke, Nell K. and Joanne Carlisle
2011“The development of comprehension.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 199–228. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alexander and Charles Goodwin
(eds.) 1993Rethinking Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Duranti, Alexander, Elinor Ochs and Bambi B. Schieffelin
2012Handbook of Language Socialization. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C.
1995“Phases of development in learning to read words by sight.” Journal of Research in Reading 18: 116–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esser, Hartmut
1999Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen Bd.1. Situationslogik und Handeln [Sociology. Special Foundations Vol. 1 The Logics of the Situation and Action]. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar
2001Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. Bd. 6: Sinn und Kultur [Sociology. Special Foundations. Vol 6: Meaning and Culture]. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
2005“Rationalität und Bindung – Das Modell der Frame-Selektion und die Erklärung des normativen Handelns [Rationality and binding – The model of frame selection and the explanation of normative action].” In Jahrbuch Normative und institutionelle Grundfragen der Ökonomik. Band 4: Reputation und Vertrauen, ed. by Martin Held, Gisela Kubon-Gilke and Richard Sturn, 85–111. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Etsuko Oishi
(eds.) 2011Context and Contexts. Parts meet whole? Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, Rita, Jörg Meibauer and Petra B. Schumacher
(eds.) 2012What is a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foorman, Barbara R. and Carol M. Connor
2011“Primary grade reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 136–156. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fox, Emily and Patricia A. Alexander
2009“Text Comprehension. A retrospective, perspective, and prospective.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 227–239. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard
1987The Mind’s New Science. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gavelek, James and Patrick Bresnahan
2009“Ways of meaning making.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 140–176. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gee, James P.
1999The New Literacy Studies and the “Social Turn.” ERIC, ED 442118.Google Scholar
2000“Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research, ed. by Michael Kamil, Peter Mosenthal, P. David Pearson and Rebecca Barr, 195–207. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2001a “ Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, ed. by E. Wendy Saul, 13–32. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.Google Scholar
2001b “ Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 44(8): 714–725. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerhart, Mary
1989“The dilemma of the text: how to ‘belong’ to a genre.” Poetics 18: 355–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, Morton Ann, Rachel R.W. Robertson, Paola Palladino and Necia K. Werner
2004“Managing mental representations during narrative construction.” Discourse Processes 37: 145–164. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2006Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  MetBibGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving.
1974Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Susan R.
2004“Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts.” In Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research, ed. by Nora Shuart-Ferris and David M. Bloome, 317–351. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Goldman, Susan R. and Herre Van
Oostendorp 1999“Conclusions, conundrums, and challenges for the future.” In The Construction of Mental Representations during Reading, ed. by Herre Van Oostendorp and Susan R. Goldman, 367–376. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Grabe, William and Fredricka L. Stoller
2011Teaching and Research Reading. Second Edition. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C. and Leslie F. Clark
1985“The generation of knowledge-based inferences during narrative comprehension.” In Inferences in Text Processing, ed. by Gert Rickheit and Hans Strohner, 53–94. Amsterdam: North-Holland. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Danielle S. McNamara and Max M. Louwerse
2011“Methods of Automated Text Analysis.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 34–53. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Keith K. Millis and Rolf A. Zwaan
1997“Discourse comprehension.” Annual Review of Psychology 48: 163–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Murray Singer and Tom Trabasso
1994“Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.” Psycholgocial Review 101(3): 371–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C., Peter Wiemer-Hastings and Katja Wiemer-Hastings
2001“Constructing inferences and relations during text comprehension.” In Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects, ed. by Ted Sanders, Jost Schilperoord and Wilbert Spooren, 249–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Greshoff, Rainer and Uwe Schimank
2012“Hartmut Essers integrative Sozialtheorie – Erklärungs- und Verstehenspotenziale [Hartmut Esser’s Integrative Social Theory – Explanatory and Interpretive Potentials].” In Professionalisierung und Diagnosekompetenz – Kompetenzentwicklung und -förderung im Lehramtsstudium [Professional Development and Diagnostic Competencies in Pre-Service Teacher Education], Online-Volume, ed. by Wilfried Hansmann, Una Dirks and Hendrik Baumbach, Ch. II. 2, 28 pages. Marburg: Philipps-University [URL: http://​archiv​.ub​.uni​-marburg​.de​/opus​/schriftenreihen​_ebene2​.php​?sr​_id​=30​&la​=de].Google Scholar
Groeben, Norbert and Sascha Schroeder
2004“Versuch einer Synopse: Sozialisationsinstanzen – Ko-Konstruktion [Attempt of a synopsis: Stages of socialization – Co-constructions.]” In Lesesozialisation in der Mediengesellschaft. Ein Forschungsüberblick [Reading Socialization in the Media Society. State of Research], ed. by Norbert Groeben and Bettina Hurrelmann, 306–348. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Gunnarsson, Britt-Louise.
1984“Functional comprehensibility of legislative texts.” Text 4 (1/3): 71–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Professional Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. and Ruqayia Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1978Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Wilfried, Una Dirks and Hendrik Baumbach
(eds) 2013Pädagogisch-soziologische Diagnosekompetenz modellieren und analysieren. Marburg: Tectum.Google Scholar
Harste, Jerome C., Carolyn Burke and Virginia Woodward
1984Language Stories and Literacy Lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hellmann, Christina.
1995“The notion of coherence in discourse.” In Focus and Coherence in Discourse Processing, ed. by Gert Rickheit and Christopher Habel, 190–202. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horning, Alice.
2010“Reading, Writing and Digitizing: A Meta-Analysis of Reading Research.” The Reading Matrix 10(2): 243–270.Google Scholar
Huey, Edmund B.
1908The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hutto, Daniel D.
1999“Cognition without representation?” In Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences, ed. by Alexander Riegler, Markus F. Peschl and Astrid V. Stein, 57–74. New York: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell H.
1962“The Ethnography of Speaking.” In Anthropology and Human Behavior, ed. by Thomas Gladwin and William Sturtevant, 13–53. Washington D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Xiangying.
2011“The Role of First Language Literacy and Second Language Proficiency in Second Language Reading Comprehension.” The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal 11(2): 177–190.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Phillip N.
1983Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, Peter H.
1984“Assessment in reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research, ed. by P. David Pearson, Rebecca Barr, Michael Kamil, and Peter Mosenthal, 147–182. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Kamil, Michael L., Peter Afflerbach, P. David Pearson and Elizabeth Birr Moje
2011“Preface. Reading Research in a Changing Era.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, XIII–XXVI. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kamil, Michael L. and Helen Kim Chou
2009“Comprehension and Computer Technology.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 289–304. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter.
1974The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
1998Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, Walter and Eileen Kintsch
2005„Comprehension.” In Children’s Reading Comprehension and Assessment, ed. by Scott G. Paris and Steven A. Stahl, 71–92. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kloosterman, Rianne, Natascha Notten, Jochem Tolsma and Gerbert Kraaykamp
2010“The Effects of Parental Reading Socialization and Early School Involvement on Children’s Academic Performance: A Panel Study of Primary School Pupils in the Netherlands.” European Sociological Review 27(3): 291–306 [URL: http://​www​.jtolsma​.nl​/uploads​/Kloosterman%202010%20ESR​.pdf, access 11/19/2012]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Michael S.
1995Teaching for Meaning in High-Poverty Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Knoester, Matthew.
2010“Independent reading and the ‚social turn‘: How adolescent readings habits and motivation relate to cultivating social relationships.” Networks 12(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Kroneberg, Clemens.
2011Die Erklärung sozialen Handelns. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kucan, Linda and Isabel L. Beck
1998“Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction and social interaction.” Review of Educational Research 67(3): 271–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Landi, Nicole
2010“An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults.” Reading & Writing 23: 701–717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langer, Judith A., Lillia Bartholome, Olga A. Vasquez and Tamara Lucas
1990“Meaning construction in school literacy tasks: A study of bilingual students.” American Educational Research Journal 27: 427–471. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James P. and Steven L. Thorne
2006Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: OUP.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, James P.
2011“The Sociocultural Approach to Second Language Acquisition.” In Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Dwight Atkinson, 24–47. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane
2011“A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition.” In Alternative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition, ed. by Dwight Atkinson, 47–73. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Joshua F. and Catherine E. Snow
2011“Oral Discourse and Reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 320–337. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lee, Carol D. and Anita Spratley
2010Reading in the Disciplines and the Challenges of Adolescent Literacy. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.Google Scholar
Lemke, Jay L.
1998“Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media.” In Handbook of Literacy and Technology: Transformations in a Post-Typographic World, ed. by David Reinking, Michael C. Mc Kenna, Linda D. Labbo and Ronald D. Kieffer, 283–301. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2001“The literacies of science.” In Crossing Borders in Literacy and Science Instruction: Perspectives on Theory and Practice, ed. by E. Wendy Saul, 33–47. Newark, DE: International Reading Association; Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.Google Scholar
Lenk, Uta.
1998Marking Discourse Coherence. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lesaux, Nonie K. and Esther Geva
2006“Synthesis: Development of literacy in language-minority students.” In Developing Literacy in Second-Language Learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth, ed. by Diane August and Timothy Shanahan, 53–74. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Leslie, Lauren and Joanne Caldwell
2009“Formal and informal measures of reading comprehension.” Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 409–427. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leu, Donald J., Charles K. Kinzer, Julie L. Coiro and Dana W. Cammack
2004“Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the internet and other information and communication technologies.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed.), ed. by Robert B. Ruddell and Norman J. Unrau, 1570–1613. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen.
1995“Cognitive Anthropology.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Lindenberg, Siegwart.
1996“Die Relevanz theoriereicher Brückenannahmen [The relevance of theoretically rich bridging inferences].” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 48(1): 126–140.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
1989“Prolegomena to a social theory of communicative genres” Slovene Studies 11(1—2): 159—166.Google Scholar
Magnusson, David
2002“The individual as the organizing principle in psychological research: A holistic approach.” In Development Science and the Holistic Approach, ed. by Lars R. Bergman, Robert B. Cairns, Lars-Goran Nilsson and Lars Nystedt, 33–47. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. and Sandra A. Thompson
1988“Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization.” Text 8: 243–281.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Joseph A.
1992“Understanding the validity in qualitative research.” Harvard Educational Review 62/(3): 279–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mcnamara, Tim
2006“Validity and values: Inferences and generalizability in language testing.” In Inference and Generalizability in Applied Linguistics. Multiple Perspectives, ed. by Micheline Chalhoub-Deville, Carol A. Chapelle and Patricia Duff, 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mähler, Claudia and Elsbeth Stern
2006“Transfer.” In: Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (3., überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage) [Handbook of Educational Psychology (3rd, revised and extended edition)], ed. by Detlef H. Rost, 782–793. Berlin: Beltz.Google Scholar
Mcvee, Mary B., Kailonnie Dunsmore and James R. Gavelek
2005“Schema theory revisited.” Review of Educational Research 75(4): 531–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mead, George
Herbert 1934Mind, Self, and Society: From the Perspective of a Social Behaviorist, edited, with an Introduction by Charles W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Samuel D. and Beverly S. Faircloth
2009“Motivation and reading comprehension.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 307–322. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moje, Elizabeth Birr, Darin Stockdill, Katherine Kim and Hyun-Ju Kim
2011“The role of text in disciplinary learning.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 453–486. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
National Center for Educational Statistics
2010Reading 2009 The Nation’s Report Card. Washington DC, U.S. Department of Education [URL: http://​nces​.ed​.gov​/nationsreportcard​/pdf​/main2009​/2010458​.pdf, access 11/12/2012].Google Scholar
Naumann, Johannes, Cordula Artelt, Wolfgang Schneider and Petra Stanat
2010„Lesekompetenz von PISA 2000 bis PISA 2009 [Reading competencies from PISA 2000 to PISA 2009].” In PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt [PISA 2009. A Survey of the Results after Ten Years], ed. by Eckhard Klieme, Cordula Artelt, Johannes Hartig, Nina Jude, Olaf Köller, Manfred Prenzel, Wolfgang Schneider and Petra Stanat, 23–71. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Oakhill, Jane V. and Kate Cain
2004“The development of comprehension skills.” In Handbook of Children’s Literacy, ed. by Terezinha Nunes and Peter Bryant, 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OECD
2009PISA 2009. Assessment Framework. Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Paratore, Jeanne R., Christina M. Cassano and Judith A. Schickedanz
2011“Supporting early (and later) literacy development at home and at school.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Surname>kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 107–135. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Paris, Scott G. and Ellen E. Hamilton
2009“The development of children’s reading comprehension.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 32–53. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paris, Scott G., Marjorie Lipson and Karen Wixson
1983“Becoming a strategic reader.” In Contemporary Educational Psychology 8(3): 293–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. David.
2009“The Roots of Reading Comprehension Instruction.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 3–31. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. David and L. Fielding
1991“Comprehension instruction.” In Handbook of Reading Research Vol. II, ed. by Rebecca Barr, Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal and P. David Pearson, 815–860. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. David
and Dale D. Johnson 1978Teaching Reading Comprehension. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart, Winston.Google Scholar
Perfetti, Charles A., Nicole Landi and Jane V. Oakhill
2005“The acquisition of reading comprehension skill.” In The Science of Reading: Handbook of Reading Research, ed. by Margaret J. Snowling and Charles Hulme, 227–247. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piaget, Jean
1972“Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood.” Human Development 15: 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prater, Kathryn
2009“Reading comprehension and English language learners.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 607–621. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pressley, Michael, Vera Woloshyn
and Associates 1995Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children’s Academic Performance (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
Puma, Michael J., Nancy Karweit, Cristofer Price, Anne Ricciuti, William Thompson and Michael Vaden-Kiernan
1997Prospects: Final Report on Student Outcomes. Washington, DC: Planning and Evaluating Service, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
RAND Reading Study Group
2002Reading for Understanding. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Recanati, François, Isidora Stojanovic and Neftalí Villanueva
(eds.) 2010Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas
2001“Multikulturalismustheorien und der Kulturbegriff. Vom Homogenitätsmodell zum Modell kultureller Interferenzen.” Berliner Journal für Soziologie 2: 179–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003“Grundelemente einer Theorie sozialer Praktiken. Eine sozialtheoretische Perspektive.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 32(4): 282–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak
2009“The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of CDA, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Roberts, Theresa A., Catherine Christo and John A. Shefelbine
2011“Word Recognition.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 228–258. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Louise M.
1978The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbodale: Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Rueda, Robert
2011“Cultural perspectives in reading.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 84–103. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, David E.
1977“Understanding and summarizing brief stories.” In Basic Processes in Reading Perception and Comprehension, ed. by David La Berge and S. Jay Samuels, 264–303. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.  BoPGoogle Scholar
1981“Schemata: The building blocks of cognition.” In Comprehension in Teaching, ed. by John T. Guthrie, 3–26. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
1994“Toward an interactive model of reading.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (4th ed.), ed. by Robert B. Ruddell, Martha Rapp-Ruddell and Harry Singer, 864–894. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted and Wilbert Spooren
1999“Communicative intentions and coherence relations.” In Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse: How to Create It and How to Describe It, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz, Uta Lenk and Eija Ventola, 235–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schatschneider, Christopher and Yaacov Petscher
2011“Statistical modeling in literacy research.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 54–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. and Elinor Ochs
1986Language Socialization across Cultures. Cambridge: CUP.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred
1971aDas Wählen zwischen Handlungsentwürfen [Choosing among projects of action]. In Gesammelte Aufsätze, Bd. 1: Das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit [Collected Papers, Vol. 1: The Problem of Social Reality], ed. by Alfred Schütz, 77–110. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1971b “ Über die mannigfachen Wirklichkeiten.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze, Bd. 1: Das Problem der sozialen Wirklichkeit [Collected Papers, Vol 1: The Problem of Social Reality] ed. by Alfred Schütz, 237–298. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. [first published: 1945. “On multiple realities.” In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5: 533–576]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred.
1972“Die soziale Welt und die Theorie der sozialen Handlung.” In Gesammelte Aufsätze, Bd. 2: Studien zur soziologischen Theorie [Collected Papers, Vol. 2: Studies in Social Theory] by Alfred Schütz, 3–21. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie, ed. by Martin Endreß and Joachim Renn, 194–209. Konstanz: UVK.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Cynthia
2009“Disciplinary comprehension.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 240–260. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shepard, Lorie A.
2000“The role of assessment in a learning culture.” Educational Researcher 29(7): 4–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singer, Harry
1970“Theoretical models of reading: Implications for teaching and research.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, ed. by Harry Singer and Robert B. Ruddell, 147–182. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Sinnott, Jan D.
1998The Development of Logic in Adulthood. Postformal Thought and its Applications. New York: Plenum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spiro, Rand J., Walter P. Vispoel, John G. Schmitz, Ala Samarapungavan and Angela E. Boerger
1987“Knowledge acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains.” In Executive Control Processes, ed. by Bruce C. Britton and Shawn M. Glynn, 177–199. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Spiro, Rand J., Richard L. Coulson, Paul J. Feltovich and Daniel K. Anderson
2004“Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.” In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th ed.), ed. by Robert B. Ruddell and Norman Unrau, 640–653. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
Stanovich, Keith E.
1980“Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.” Reading Research Quarterly 16(1): 32–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steffensen, Margaret S. and Chitra Joag-Dev
1984“Cultural knowledge and reading.” In Reading in a Foreign Language, ed. by J. Charles Alderson and Alexander H. Urquhart, 48–61. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sumara, Dennis J.
2003“Toward a theory of embodied literacy experience.” English Journal 2(2): 88–95.Google Scholar
The New London Group
1996“A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, William I. and Florian Znaniecki
1927The Polish Peasant in Europe and America (Vol. 1). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Thorndike, Edward L.
1917“Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading.” Journal of Educational Psychology 8: 323–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unger, Christoph.
2006Genre, Relevance and Global Coherence. The Pragmatics of Discourse Type. Hampshire, England: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Upton, Thomas and Li-Chun Lee-Thompson
2001“The role of the first language in second language reading.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23: 469–495.Google Scholar
Urquhart, Sandy and Cyril Weir
1998Reading in a Second Language: Process, Product and Practice. Longman: New York.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S.
1962Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
1978Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wade, Suzanne E. and Elizabeth Birr Moje
2000“The role of text in classroom learning.” In Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3), ed. by Michael L. Kamil, Peter B. Mosenthal, P. David Pearson and Rebecca Barr, 609–627. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, Karen
2004“Mind, language, and epistemology: Toward a language socialization paradigm for SLA.” Modern Language Journal 88: 331–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, James V.
1998Mind as Action. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Weber, Max.
1988a [1922] “Über einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie [About Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology]. In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (7th edition) by Max Weber, ed. by Johannes Winckelmann, 427–474. Tübingen: Mohr [engl.: Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1988b [1922] “Soziologische Grundbegriffe [Basic Sociological Terms].” In Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre (7th edition) by Max Weber, ed. by Johannes Winckelmann, 541–581. Tübingen: Mohr [engl.: Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press].Google Scholar
Wharton-Mcdonald, Ruth and Shannon Swiger
2009“Developing Higher-Order Comprehension in the Middle Grades.” In Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, ed. by Susan E. Israel and Gerald G. Duffy, 510–530. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
White, Peter R.
2002“Appraisal.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Ian A.G. and Eun Hye Son
2011“A dialogic turn in research on learning and teaching to comprehend.” In Handbook of Reading Research. Vol. IV, ed. by Michael L. Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Birr Moje and Peter Afflerbach, 359–387. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A., Joseph P. Magliano and Arthur C. Graesser
1995 “Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21: 386–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A. and Gabriel Radvansky
1998“Situation models in language comprehension and memory.” Psychological Bulletin 123: 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar