Therapeutic conversation

Liisa Voutilainen & Anssi Peräkylä
Table of contents

Psychotherapeutic conversation is a specific form of institutional talk (see Drew & Heritage 1992 and Heritage & Clayman 2010 for a discussion of the range of differences between institutional and everyday talk). Unlike everyday conversation, it has a pre-ordained, mutually agreed upon and specific purpose – which is, in general terms, to improve the client’s mental health – and, like any institutional encounter between a practitioner and client, it entails an asymmetric conversational relationship between participants (in this case, for example, one asks questions, the other conveys his/her troubles). But unlike many other institutions, psychotherapy does not always maintain “businesslike” emotional neutrality: it can resemble everyday conversation between friends, involving disclosures of personal experiences and emotional expression and response.

Full-text access is restricted to subscribers. Log in to obtain additional credentials. For subscription information see Subscription & Price.

References

Antaki, Charles.
2008 “Formulations in psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 26–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Rebecca Barnes and Ivan Leudar
2005 “Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy.” Discourse Studies 7: 627–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bercelli, Fabrizio, Federico Rossano and Maurizio Viaro
2008 “Clients’ responses to therapists’ re-interpretations.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 4–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Supra-session courses of action in psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics 57: 118–137. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Buttny, Richard.
1996 “Client’s and therapist’s joint construction of the client’s problems.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29(2): 125–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Kathy.
1986 “The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy.” Sociology of Health and Illness 8: 44–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul and John Heritage
1992 “Analyzing talk at work: An introduction.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Falk, Hanna.
2013 Discussing Anorexia. A Conversation Analytical Study on Treatment Discussions between Anorectic Patients and Professionals. Publications of the Department of Social Research 2013: 11, Sociology, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen W.
1994 Therapeutic Ways with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, Pamela and Ivan Leudar
2010 “On active listening in person-centred, solution-focused psychotherapy.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3188–3198. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks
1970 “On formal structures of practical actions.” In Theoretical Sociology, ed. by John C. McKinney and Edward A. Tiryakian, 337–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Greenson, Ralph R.
1967 The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa and Jonathan Potter
2012 “Crying and crying responses.” In Emotion and Interaction ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 195–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Steven Clayman
2010 Talk-in-Action: Identities, Interaction and Institutions. Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John and Rod Watson
1979 “Formulations as conversational objects.” In Everyday Language, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian.
2005 “ ‘Active listening’: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counselling.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38: 303–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance ‘I don’t know’.” Discourse Studies 4: 147–168. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam.
1990 Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Kondratyuk, Nataliya and Anssi Peräkylä
2011 “Therapeutic work with the present moment: A conversation analytical study of guidance into immediacy.” Psychotherapy Research 21(3): 316–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshel
1977 Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Laitinen, Lea.
1995 Nollapersoona [‘The zero person construction’]. Virittäjä 99: 337–358.Google Scholar
Lepper, Georgia and Erhard Mergentahler
2008 “Observing therapeutic interaction in the ‘Lisa’ case.” Psychotherapy Research 17(5): 634–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacMartin, Clare.
2008 “Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen and I. Leudar, 62–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Madill, Anna, Sue Widdicombe and Michael Barkham
2001 “The potential of conversation analysis for psychotherapy research.” The Counseling Psychologist 29: 413–434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melander, Helen and Fritjof Sahlström
2009 “In tow of the blue whale. Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation.” Journal of Pragmatics, 41: 1519–1537. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza and Simona Pekarek Doehler
2004 “Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 88: 501–518. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter and Kwok Tim Choi
2010 “Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy.” Discourse Studies 12(3): 331–356. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, Naomi Knight and Ashley Watkins
2012 “Working to keep aligned in psychotherapy: Using nods as a dialogic resource to display affiliation.” Language and Dialogue 2(1): 9–27. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter.
2013 “Resistance in couples counselling: Sequences of talk that disrupt progressivity and promote disaffiliation.” Journal of Pragmatics 49: 18–37. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter and Adam O. Horvarth
2013 “The therapeutic relationship in action: How therapists and clients co-manage relational disaffiliation.” Psychotherapy Research (advance online publication). DOI logo.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott.
1951 The Social System. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pawelczyk, Joanna.
2011 Talk as Therapy: Psychotherapy in a Linguistic Perspective. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi.
2004 “Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: A conversation analytic view.” Psychotherapy Research 14: 289–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Patients’ responses to interpretations. A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory.” Communication & Medicine 2: 163–176. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2008 “Conversation analysis and psychoanalysis: Interpretation, affect and intersubjectivity.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 100–119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar
2008 “Analysing Psychotherapy in Practice.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 5–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi.
2011 “After interpretation: Third position utterances in psychoanalysis.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44(3): 288–316.Google Scholar
2012 “Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy.” In Blackwell Handbook in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Tanya Stivers and Jack Sidnell, 551–574. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Die Interaktionsgeschichte einer Deutung.” In Sozialität in Slow Motion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven, ed. by Ruth Ayass and Christian Meyer, 375–405. Wiesbaden: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pittinger, Robert. E., Charles F. Hockett, and John J. Danehy
1960 The First Five Minutes. A Sample of Microscopic Interview Analysis. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.Google Scholar
Rae, John.
2008 “Lexical substitution as a therapeutic resource.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar, 62–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruusuvuori, Johanna and Liisa Voutilainen
2009 “Comparing affiliating responses to troubles-tellings in different types of health care encounters.” In Talk in Interaction: Comparative Dimensions, ed. by Markku Haakana, Minna Laakso and Jan Lindström, 206–230. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey.
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.  BoPGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
Scheflen, Albert E.
1973 Communicational Structure. Analysis of a Psychotherapy Transaction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, Daniel.
2004 The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Wampold, Bruce E.
2001 The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna.
2003 “Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction.” Text 23 (4): 573–606.  BoPGoogle Scholar
2008 “Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy, ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 120–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna, Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, and Ivan Leudar
2008 “A review of the conversational practices of psychotherapy.” In Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy ed. by Anssi Peräkylä, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen and Ivan Leudar, 188–197. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina and Anssi Peräkylä
2013 “A comparative conversation analytic study of formulations in psychoanalysis and cognitive psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (4): 299–321. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2014 “Prosody and empathic communication in psychotherapy interaction.” Psychotherapy Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiste, Elina, Liisa Voutilainen and Anssi Peräkylä
submitted). “Epistemic relations in psychotherapy: Comparative analysis of therapist’s assertions regarding the client’s mind in cognitive therapy and psychoanalysis.”
Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2010 “Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43: 85–107. DOI logo  BoPGoogle Scholar
2011 “Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence.” Psychotherapy Research 21(3): 348–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa.
2012 “Responding to emotion in cognitive psychotherapy.” In Emotion in Interaction. ed. by Anssi Peräkylä and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 235–255. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Pentti Henttonen, Mikko Kahri, Niklas Ravaja, Mikko Sams and Anssi Peräkylä
2013 “Therapist’s formulations and physiological responses of a patient and a therapist.” Paper presented at the 13th International Pragmatics Conference, 13 September 2013, New Delhi, India.