The concept of ‘status’ can refer to social ranking as well as to group membership. The term can also refer to alignment in social interaction, or participation status, to use Goffman’s (1981) terminology. In all three respects, the status of interpreters can be characterised as ambiguous and ambivalent.
2004Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. . BoP
Anderson, R.Bruce W
1976“Perspectives on the Role of Interpreter.” In Translation, Applications and Research, W. Rickard (ed.), 208–228. New York: Gardner Press. TSB
2004Gesprächsdynamik in Dolmetsch-Interaktionen. Eine empirische Untersuchung von Situationen internationaler Fachkommunikation. Radolfzell: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
Bastin, Georges L. & Bandia, Paul F
(eds)2006Charting the Future of Translation History. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. TSB
2004De-/Re-Contextualizing Conference Interpreting. Amsterdam/Pvhiladelphia: John Benjamins. . BoP
1981Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. BoP
1990/1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. BoP
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
1990He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. BoP